Had a conversation with @paleochristcon from the @whatever podcast about a wide range of issues from an Objectivist perspective. I’ll let you guys be the judge of the debate
https://t.co/J0sLdxIHO1
@IsaYermaw16391@eduardoyanez__ I think if you’re unsure of the contents of the article and other people have no problem applying what I’ve said to their own thinking, it’s likely a tracking error on your end and not me being a retard.
@liquid2ulu@eduardoyanez__ If some pursuit is bad for him and good for you then trivially yes? I don’t think it’d be good for Ed to start a YT and talk about political philosophy but I do think that’s for good for you.
@liquid2ulu@eduardoyanez__ You asked as a matter of principle whether something can count as good for one and not the other; that’s what my answer was. If you think there is a difference, it isn’t one relevant to the question you asked.
@liquid2ulu@eduardoyanez__ Diabetic people definitely can’t consume the amount of sugar I do. Moralities relative nature enables contextual difference in what constitutes a value to the valuer.