@Stan_Subru@xysist@FaibaMobile They were very slow to respond to my queries,finally they gave me one of their rep to install,the guy did not show up on agreed date,one week later is when they followed up
Applying for visa is so humiliating mahn. It’s giving “white man please let me into your country, I promise to be of good behaviour and I’ll leave when I said I’ll leave. Here’s all my life’s worth and evidence that I have something doing. Pls just let me in”. So embarrassing.
🇾🇪 Bitterness Disguised as Standards: How United's Legends Lost Their Way 🧵
Manchester United's challenges extend far beyond the pitch. While tactical debates and squad rebuilding dominate headlines, another problem festers in the background: former players whose commentary has devolved from constructive criticism into something far more destructive.
Roy Keane's recent outburst about Manchester United's coaching appointments epitomises this troubling trend. His dismissive comments about Jonny Evans joining the coaching staff revealed more about Keane himself than about United's decision-making.
"Evans was at United 4-5 weeks ago as a loans manager, and then Fletcher gives him the job," Keane sneered. "He has two games, Fletcher goes and then Carrick gives him a job. Great isn't it? We should all go to Barbados for a week."
The irony is staggering. Keane himself transitioned into management at Sunderland with zero coaching experience. Yet when Evans, a player who spent two seasons with the current squad and possesses intimate knowledge of these players, receives a coaching role, Keane treats it as a farce.
His mockery extended beyond Evans. He ridiculed Fletcher ("he knows the guy in the canteen, he rings Ferguson up to ask what socks he's going to wear") and even took aim at Carrick's wife: "His wife has a big mouth sometimes. Maybe she's doing team-talks."
This isn't punditry. It’s playground bullying dressed up as analysis.
1/5
#MUFC #ManchesterUnited #Keane #Scholes
A bizarre trend right now: any criticism of Ruben Amorim is instantly framed as backing INEOS or the Glazers. That's lazy. One does not equal the other.
Amorim was sacked for the wrong reasons - that’s clear. Acknowledging that doesn’t mean he's beyond criticism. Multiple things can be true at the same time.
INEOS were supposed to be different. Instead, we've seen the same pattern:
• Erik ten Hag
• Dan Ashworth
• Ruben Amorim
Poor organisation, weak strategy, zero learning curve.
This isn’t bad luck - it’s inexperience. Football decisions being made without a coherent long-term plan, then justified after the fact.
None of that absolves the real problem. The Glazers have drained this club for two decades, hollowed it out & left it dysfunctional on & off the pitch.
I may have more faith in INEOS than the Glazers - but faith isn’t loyalty. Protests are still necessary. The cancer has been rotting away since 2005.
Glazers out.
This is the avenue for all corruption in Kenya and we are not making enough noise.
Everyone calling for change in Kenya must start with this.
REPEAL SECTION 50, Subsection 7, Part C and D of the Public Finance Management Act.
This is the loophole your leaders use to loot!