繁星若尘

[EglantierSupreme @EglantierSuprem]

@Blajblaj2023

[繁星若尘 @YL235711]

@o_oddbb_ 生日快乐

[Raportory @raportory]

Sosyal medyada viral olan poşet çay uçurma akımına katılan kedi, bir süre akıl tutulması yaşadı.

[無 @muri112233]

コロナに感染、40度の高熱にうなされていたら3歳娘に「びょーいん行く？と聞かれ「うん」と答えたところ、突然お医者さんごっこが始まった。2時間後「ちにました」と言われ、わたしは死んだ。

[‘Chinese’ Gordon 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Gordon_Pasha]

I honestly can’t stop laughing

[Mittelfranke @Rubenbauer16]

Das ist das eigentliche Ostdeutschland und hätte nach der Wiedervereinigung 1990 so entstehen müssen. Aber die WV erfolgte lediglich durch einen Zusammenschluss der beiden Wirtschaftsgebiete von West nach Ost zu einem Mitteldeutschland.

[Mamamia @casiopao]

@RnaudBertrand The west love using big words on their sides to paint them as good guys.

Liberator when they are colonizer
Saviour when they are killer
Women empowerment when they are top rapist in the world
Freedom lover when they support dictactor that support their sides.

[Helena @legrand_helena]

@RnaudBertrand This is the scary thing about the US regime: it's able to coordinate massive smear campaigns through its media assets and "NGOs at an astonishing rate. Within hours, a Nepal-born natural disaster and a destroyed Chinese border checkpoint, turned it into a classic China Bad story

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

This is genuinely shocking and really illustrates how "Human Rights Watch" is much more of a political organization than one that actually cares about human rights.

Read the piece: it doesn't contain a single expression of sympathy for the victims, not one. Last I checked, if you genuinely cared about human rights, you'd start by caring about... humans.

The victims are only mentioned in the piece to the extent they can be used as props for HRW's usual crusade against China.

In fact if you read the article you almost get the feeling HRW are relishing in the disaster, grateful for fresh material to rewrite the same "the choreography is familiar" article they publish every time something bad happens in China. They even wrote so themselves.

Worse still, their big beef - apparently - is with China's "information control." Yet in the very same article they actively spread misinformation about the disaster, thereby ironically proving that they're guilty of the very thing they're accusing China of: manipulating information about a disaster to serve a political agenda.

2 ways they do this:

1) they write that the CCTV footage "showing Gyirong Port on the Chinese side of the border overwhelmed by floodwater as people run for their lives is being censored" in China, which is a thoroughly debunked piece of disinformation (see https://t.co/UbreDvxelw)

2) they sow doubt on the origin of the mudslide, describing Chinese visualization of it as "AI-generated materials purporting to show the likely origins of the mudslide." The word "purporting" means that the origin of the landslide is in doubt when that's not the case at all: the scientific consensus is total, it was a glacier collapse on the Nepalese side. For proof, I encourage you to watch this fantastic explanation of it by @mikebettes on the Weather Channel (not exactly "CCP propaganda"): https://t.co/zeVyzMi35o

I mean, ask yourself: how do you even remotely serve "human rights" by undermining public understanding of what killed people in a natural disaster?

Answer: you don't.

You serve what HRW actually serves: a political narrative that treats every disaster in China not as a tragedy to understand but as an opportunity to exploit, at the expense of actual humans.

[AfD-Fraktion Brandenburg @AfD_FraktionBB]

8. Mai - kein Tag zum Feiern! | @DKaufner
Mit dem Vormarsch der Roten Armee 1944/45 brach zu Kriegsende eine Gewaltorgie über Mitteleuropa ein. 15 Millionen Deutsche wurden vertrieben, zwei Millionen ermordet, vermutlich ebenso viele Frauen und Kinder durch Rotarmisten und Westalliierte vergewaltigt. Briten und Amerikaner legten deutsche Innenstädte in Schutt und Asche. Die Erinnerungspolitik der Bundesrepublik hat diese Verbrechen in ihrer Einseitigkeit viel zu lange vernachlässigt. Für uns ist klar: der 8. Mai ist kein Tag zum Feiern.

[Avalleria von Asen @avalleria_asen]

Über 700 Jahre deutsche Heimat ⚡️

[K总 @KFCQZ]

😂真是雪上加霜啊！
李老师偏袒女拳师行为，导致评论区频频被人冲塔，甚至连李老师和台湾合作的611项目，也被人成功举报，而李老师也悄悄把置顶的611推文撤下来。

[田字格 @tianzige4]

这两家谣媒将被刻上新闻行业的耻辱柱。

[東洋蓮花酥🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🌹重生归来我要夺回属于自己的一切🔥 🇹🇼 👊 @RenChanT_T]

：“你们这群反贼大殖子只支持乌克兰🇺🇦却不支持巴勒斯坦🇵🇸 一群美狗50w”
“呃 所以你支持巴勒斯坦🇵🇸却还支持俄罗斯🇷🇺么？”
当粉畜在说别人双标的时候 那么他们自己一定就在双标😁

[BBR VIBES @BBR_VIBES]

Le voile est interdit sur la photo d'identité en France comme le sont la casquette, l'écharpe ou le chapeau. La règle c'est tête nue, islam ou pas. Ce n'est pas la France qui est islamophobe, ce sont les autres pays qui se couchent devant l'islam.

Fière de mon pays 💪🇫🇷🥖

[三秋桂子🎃 @Cairos2002]

看到个细思极恐的回答。😇迎接我们的是表面繁荣内核空洞且高度同质的未来。

[Li Jingjing 李菁菁 @Jingjing_Li]

BBC has no idea why it lost the trust of viewers.

Everyone in the comments is calling it out for making fake news.

BBC uses a tragedy as a political tool to spew its own China-bashing propaganda, but audiences have been watching China's television and social media broadcasting the mudslides 24/7. They know BBC is lying.

Media in China are bringing critical information to audiences across the whole nation, at the same time making sure the content they show is not further hurting families of the victims.

But the BBC only wants disaster porn to get views; they don't care about anyone who has been affected by this disaster.

[D_H @Daniel_H_1975]

@bbcchinese SB BBC

[山夫 hiker @worldpeople2019]

一场纯粹的天灾，暴露出了西方媒体刻在骨子里的傲慢与偏见，暴露出了印度人如蛆虫一般的恶心下贱，暴露出了台蛙、支黑的毫无人性，暴露出反贼群体非蠢即坏的本性，也打破了我关于海外藏人不撒谎造谣的“刻板印象”。这是一场反华群体的狂欢盛宴，这帮畜类如秃鹫一般吞食撕扯着死者的遗体，毫无人性。

[小战狼·矿献忠🇨🇳🇮🇱 @chn_mustermann]

德国一台一边阴阳中国如何控制信息，一边顺手关了自己的评论区。这他妈谁绷得住😅