Yor_Forger

[Yor_Forger @Yorforger11]

@MaddyArt3 Kant believes that "stuff that has work to do" is not in the "aesthetic" piece.

[Yor_Forger @Yorforger11]

@MaddyArt3 For example, to determine whether a well-made hammer has aesthetic value, we must first disinterest its "hammerness. If the hammer exists solely for its function, then the "function" of the hammer is an impediment to aesthetic judgment here.

[Yor_Forger @Yorforger11]

@MaddyArt3 Nice interpretation! My only question is that, what do you mean by saying "a thingness beauty" while illustrating Ando's work. As far as I know, Kant states that Aesthetic judgement should be disinterested. this means that aesthetics should be stripped of his materiality.