1/ 📰 Important Update: The third draft of the #EU's General-Purpose AI Code of Practice has been released by independent experts. This iteration presents a streamlined structure with enhanced commitments and measures. #AI#TechNews
5/ 🗣️ Stakeholders are invited to provide feedback on the draft until March 30, 2025. The final Code is anticipated by May, aiding AI model providers in complying with the AI Act. #AIRegulation#Feedback
So we see here that if the system works well, there are checks to address the concerns raised Before, during and After the run of a project.
So I get the feeling that this discussion was never about really the concerns raised just an opportunity for political scoring.
This is a quite problematic approach that wastes tax payers money and time. I explain:
Projects are funded based on Calls.
Calls are prepared by the executive branch (EC) after their framework (scope, objectives, funding rules etc.) are approved by the EP and the Council.
#EuropeanParliament to probe EU grants to Shell, Volkswagen and migrant NGOs
A fight over how the Commission spends its cash expands to 28 NGOs and business giants.
https://t.co/JX5oZm44Lx
After these projects finish, they need to prepare a Final Report that includes information on all aspects of the project. These reports are again checked by the funders (EC).
Some projects might also be selected to be audited by external professionals.
The European People's Party (EPP) has expressed concerns over grants to green NGOs, alleging these funds are used for lobbying activities that may conflict with EU strategic objectives. In response, left-wing groups have called for scrutiny of grants awarded to large corporations
#EuropeanParliament to probe EU grants to Shell, Volkswagen and migrant NGOs
A fight over how the Commission spends its cash expands to 28 NGOs and business giants.
https://t.co/JX5oZm44Lx