El mundo va a sanar cuando las mujeres dejemos de vernos a nosotras mismas como una especie de premio de consolación, una bandita para "tapar" experiencias decepcionantes con varones o como una 2da "opción" segura tras fracasar con la primera (un hombre). No es por aquí, chicas.
Kaže moja ginekološkinja: "Žene se boje da ću ih grditi kad ne dođu po par godina. A samo mislim da je bolje da dođu i tad, nego nikad - nije moje da ih grdim, već da im pružim zdravstvenu negu i edukujem da sledeći put dođu ranije".
I to je jedini ispravan stav, ako mene pitate.
čekajte sad da mi objasne kul brat ribe kako je u redu ženama govoriti da su fukse u sklopu političke kampanje za izbore ako to rade naši divni studenti ali je grozno ako to radi zli grozni dragan j. vučićević
@NadaMirkov41659@Nebojsa97332531 Liberali bukv mrze siromašne.
Ono što radi Danas kada piše o tome kako ljudi manje vrede jer nemaju novca za zubara pa ostanu bez zuba je bukv mržnja samo što je mržnja prema sirotinji za liberale dobra mržnja.
In patriarchy men treat each other with love, care, admiration and compassion, while brutalising women like slaves. This comes out strikingly in Epstein files, how gently these men spoke to one another, as they conspired to carry out unspeakable violence against women and girls.
Article extract:
“Those who speak too early are punished and framed as delusional conspiracy theorists and liars. Those who speak after convictions, inquiries, and official apologies are praised for their bravery. The difference between madness and heroism is often nothing more than timing.
Everyone who spots a pattern too early can be reframed as mentally ill (especially as there is no science behind ‘diagnosis’) - and we have seen this in other forms of organised abuse too. Look at the way victims and advocates were framed as conspiracy theorists when they tried to raise sexual abuse in the church, by priests. I still remember the days when the victims were framed as vulnerable, deranged, manipulative and confused - only for it all to come out to be totally true.
The same happened when victims and advocates were trying to speak up about the abuses and crimes being covered up by the Royal Family… and where did that lead us?
And what about other ‘conspiracies’ that turned out to be true? The one that just sprung to mind was the #FreeBritney Movement - in which the fans of Britney were absolutely certain that she was being abused, controlled, drugged and financially exploited. I don’t need to remind you how that unfolded - after years of framing everyone as mentally ill Britney supporters.
Virginia Giuffre was not believed because belief would have required action. It would have required confronting the reality that abuse is not a fringe phenomenon carried out by monsters on the margins, but something embedded within elite networks, facilitated by wealth, and protected by institutions.
The people who believed her were not naïve or gullible. They were paying attention. And for that, they were pathologised alongside her.”
It actually felt brave when Sinead O’Connor tore up a photo of the pope on SNL in 1992 or when the Dixie Chicks criticized Bush and the Iraq war in 2003. They were saying things that were considered controversial at the time and lost career opportunities & a huge portion of their fan bases. It took balls, and refusing to apologize after the backlash did too.
After a decade or more of this nonsense, I can’t believe we’re STILL expected to applaud celebrities for saying the most widely accepted and politically correct opinions at every single award show. Just completely meaningless.
I think about the intro to Dworkin's piece all the time: "You won’t ever know the worst that happened to Nicole Brown Simpson in her marriage, because she is dead and cannot tell you. And if she were alive, remember, you wouldn’t believe her."