@ntnactvcrkhs So Deepika’s acting is apparently too advanced to describe, while Alia’s is just director magic? Convenient. One actress gets credit for every good choice, the other gets blamed for every good choice.
Four films, same expressions, same screen presence, same performance. Deepika Padukone seems to be repeating the same act in Jawan, Pathaan, Fighter, and Kalki. At some point, it stops feeling like a signature style and starts looking like a lack of range.
@ntnactvcrkhs Not every transformation has to be loud. Alia makes you believe the character's thoughts, fears, and motivations. If the audience remembers Sehmat or Gangubai before they remember the actor, she's done her job.
@ntnactvcrkhs Being the only person I interacted with doesn’t mean you won the argument 😭 it just means you kept replying. The dedication is actually impressive
@ntnactvcrkhs Nobody said voice doesn’t matter 💀 the point is some people stop at the accent, others build an entire person around it. That’s the difference.
@ntnactvcrkhs That’s the difference though Alia’s acting makes you forget the actor and focus on the person she’s playing. She doesn’t just change clothes and vibes, she changes the whole personality.
@ntnactvcrkhs I've seen plenty. The difference is that with Naina, Veronica, Mastani, Rubina, or Serena, I still know I'm watching Deepika. With Gangubai, Sehmat, or Veera, the actor disappears and the character takes over. That's the distinction being made.
@ntnactvcrkhs Btw, is it Gujju or Guiju? I've only ever heard Gujju. Since we're dissecting accents and pronunciation with such precision, I thought accuracy might be important.
@ntnactvcrkhs You're reducing acting to accents while arguing against a point about characterization. If voice modulation alone defined range, every mimicry artist would be a great actor. The difference is in the psychology, mannerisms, and emotional rhythm of the character.