If anyone who is Pro-AI would be willing to have a rational, level headed discussion I would love to try and understand where you’re coming from. I’m mostly seeing people use name calling and threats which I don’t want to engage with. Would love an actual conversation.
@cyph3rasi@wiz____z Incorrect. First, the myth was Edison did that to make DC power look better than AC power, but in reality that debate was long over and the elephant was sentenced to death and Edison’s film crew filmed it for entertainment.
If you’re going to be wrong, at least be right.
@LillyByteGames Generating a single image with AI uses as much energy as fully charging a smartphone. There are over 80 million images generated with AI each day, not even including videos which take extra power. A Google search is about the same as powering a single lightbulb for 17 seconds.
@WhitePaperKat1@SantaDecides I don’t disagree, but continuing to endorse and promote AI “art” is killing the medium further and will discourage people from learning the skill
@cyph3rasi@wiz____z I wouldn’t be too sure about that. The people in charge of these services are starting to get freaked out and might start sunlighting them sooner than you think. They’re not a sustainable business model, and they’re starting to realize that. Have you built any sort of skill set?
@necropanda94 I mean it is because you’re still just telling a bot what to do, it’s like saying producers of a movie are creative when they’re not the ones lighting/acting/writing/or directing it
@LillyByteGames Right but we’re not talking about just prompts, we’re talking about generative AI which with all of the TikTok filters, AI image generators, etc are being used more and more. That takes a lottttt more power and cooling than the equivalent of a handful of Google searches
@necropanda94 It’s creatively lazy. If someone works a manual job but doesn’t take out their trash they might not be occupationally lazy but they’re chore-lazy.
@PeacefulGamer I have about 400 hours combined so far, but I only started playing a couple years ago and had no access to it for about a year of that. Definitely love existing in the NMS universe as much as possible!
@WhitePaperKat1@SantaDecides I have a job, so I write for free. People who are trying to live off their art are charging more because life is becoming very expensive. If this were the 90s I guarantee they’d be charging $10 a commission, but we live in the “a trip to grocery store for two people is $300” era
@SantaDecides No, we’re employed to do customer service work, which they’re trying to pawn off on AI. We’re employed by people paying for our art and creativity, which AI is threatening because of the lower/no cost to the user. Internships will be gone and there will be no ladders to climb
@SaionMiko@priestessofdada Again it all comes back to name calling. Love it.
Yes the internet is baked into a lot of things, but if you truly believe you’d have to be Amish to go a day without using the internet then you really need to go out and explore the world.
@LadyDemosthenes Yeah that’s not what a lot of people are using it for, but that’s all happening millions of times a day ON TOP of what others are using it for. It’s using up so much water and polluting small towns to a literal sickening degree.
@SaionMiko@priestessofdada There have been multiple cases of people having AI related psychosis, literally becoming schizophrenic because of their AI dependency. I can hop off the internet and still be able to write, most of these people can’t say the same.
@lovaniceth 2/2
is what has made some of the best photos, scenes, games. An AI never had to figure out how to make spaceships look like they’re flying with the limitations of 1977 cameras and technology. AI could never make Star Wars because it lacks the human heart to.
@lovaniceth A human still had to find/set up the subject, adjust the settings to their liking, still has to abide by the laws of physics and reality. This is basic comprehension. It’s taking all of the little “oh no it’s raining, how should I solve this problem?” out of art which 1/2