@hoss_crypto Hi, vielen Dank für deinen Content. Ich habe gelesen, dass wir am ende der "18 year real estate cycle" sind. Im "winners curse" phase des cycle. Was hältst du davon?
@SecDef Putin’s Russia threatens our NATO allies’ security in Europe. By fighting, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are weakening the Russian military threat every day. Ukrainians are fighting the Russian invaders today so that Poles, Estonians & Americans do not have to do so tomorrow.
@stats_feed Were Putin to succeed in transforming Ukraine into a forward operating base, front-line NATO allies would be threatened, demanding more American assistance, including increased deployment of our troops.
You can always tell who regurgitates BS without even two seconds of research.
Were aren’t just sending bags of cash.
Most of what we are sending is old weapons and ammo from US stockpiles priced at $X that the military was going to replace and upgrade anyway.
Yes, there is some cash aid, primarily being spent on live saving supplies for civilians, but the vast majority of US aid to Ukraine.
Last I checked at around $78B only about $4b was humanitarian aid. $42b was weapons/ammo/supplies, $4.5b was credits with other countries to buy weapons and $26.4b was financial support.
The cash portion of financial aid is from international development programs like USAid or through development loan provisions.
But the vast bulk of the aid given to Ukraine is under a lend-lease program.
At the end of the war Ukraine will return weapons and ammo for credit and then begin to pay off the loans.
The only part not covered by lend-lease is the US support and training personnel in Europe and the USAid component.
All which account for less than 0.05% of the annual DoD budget.
So anyone complaining that we are sending money to Ukraine instead of helping the US is an idiot.
Because the US domestic problems will not be solved with an outdated Howitzer.
🤷♂️