wait wait i think you have found your right customer haha. would love to know how you would do it. I am currently trying to get up a open source community. Found out that we lack feedback the most, we are good with our ideas and how to handle any idea, what we lack is how to get it out there.
@whyXshubh That's actually a really good point. The conversation should be more about how we differentiate between trustworthy and untrustworthy content. Consuming the latter can be highly misleading.
We are rapidly losing the ability to trust our own eyes.
As AI fidelity explodes, the line between reality and generation is disappearing. By 2026, the obvious artifacts—like weird fingers or lighting glitches—will be gone. If we can't computationally or cryptographically verify content, how do we differentiate?
What is your strategy for navigating the deepfake era? Is "proof of humanity" now essential?
#AIDeepfakes #TechTrends #GenerativeAI #Verification
In 2026, we’re at a career crossroads:
Some say the "Jack of all trades" is the ultimate survivor in a fast-moving world. Others argue AI commoditizes generalists, making "Master of one" the only path to a premium.
Both sides think the other is facing obsolescence. Who’s right?
You're right on the Karpathy point. That said, I still believe deep expertise matters. If you’re a generalist trying to do many things, AI will probably replace you. But if you’re a true expert in one domain, AI can take over 90% of the work… it’ll still need you for that final critical 10% where real judgment and taste matter.