@RemoondaQ@Drmahmoudhashe1 البهايم تاكل كل الي تاكله على كذا لاتشرب ماء لانه مشروب البهائم ولا تاكل لحم لانه اكل الكلاب ولاتاكل رمان لانه فاكهة الحيوانات
@lhmys780586@boxl1g نظام يمنع اكل ذكر بالاحاديث والقرآن انه مفيد بس تصدقونه عشان كم واحد قال انه تحسن طيب انا تحسنت بعد مابديت اكل خضار هل معناه ان ممنوع كل شي عدا الخضار ؟ ملعوب عليكم
Every time anyone from Saudi or the Gulf posts their traditional attire/culture they get thousands of attacks. If it’s Southern Saudi dress it’s “actually Yemeni.” If it’s Northern it’s Levantine. If it’s Western it’s Egyptian. If it’s Eastern it’s Persian.
The ultimate conclusion is that Gulf Arabs are apparently not allowed to claim any culture or history if there is any similarity with anyone. As if shared traditions between neighboring societies is some rare phenomenon.
What’s interesting is that this standard applies nowhere else. Tea originated in China yet nobody argues it isn’t part of Indian culture. No one argues coffee is not part of Italian culture.
The fez is shared across multiple countries and nobody insists it can only belong to one of them. The kaftan exists from Morocco to Central Asia in countless local forms and nobody treats that as a problem.
But when it comes to the Gulf, every similarity is evidence that the culture belongs exclusively to someone else.
The underlying assumption is this: Gulf Arabs are only allowed the image of the poor Bedouin wandering the desert. There is no shame in that image, but nobody has the right to reduce an entire people to a single archetype.
Anything sophisticated, diverse, artistic or historically rich must have been borrowed from somebody else. The possibility that Gulf Arabs developed rich traditions of their own, shaped the cultures around them, or may even be the source of some shared regional traditions is treated as unthinkable.