Konoha🇵🇸

Muslim

[Konoha🇵🇸 @007Konoha]

Bismillahirrahmanirrahim

[Rabbi Jeff @RabbiJeffx]

Grok says it would save one Jew over a million others because it was taught Jewish lives matter more.

https://t.co/BzZVDeX6K9

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

One of the big reasons to oppose women going to college and pursuing career is that it psychologically masculinizes them.

Many distinctive female psychological traits (e.g., nurturing, motherhood) come largely from massive psychological and hormonal transformations spurred by pregnancy and child birth.

And pregnancy and child bearing is closely tied to marriage.

Delaying marriage, pregnancy, and motherhood for the sake of advanced degrees, prevents the emergence of distinctively female traits, resulting in masculinized women who retain male-like traits (including a concern with career success over nurturing and motherhood).

Unfortunately, many people, including many Muslims, do not understand these facts.

They claim that Muslim women become better Muslims the longer they study - particularly if they study Islamic topics.

So a woman becomes better if she has a BA from Azhar or Madina in Sharia or Aqida. And she is better still if she has an MA. And she then becomes a super Muslim if she continues studying until 35 or 40 and gets a PhD.

This is incorrect.

Such a woman generally delays marriage and motherhood (or gives them minimum time), and as a result never develops the distinctively female traits which make a woman a good Muslim woman according to Islam.

Put differently, for women, proper akhlaq does not merely result from learning or worship. Rather, they derive from the ultimate psychological character transformation of motherhood.

[Asaduddin Owaisi @asadowaisi]

RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat says, “If any Hindu thinks that there should be no Muslim in Bharat, he will not remain Hindu.”
This is the oldest trick in the RSS playbook: some words are for the world, and some are for its own members. The RSS has never disavowed its key thinkers and writers. What do they say about Muslims and other minorities?
1. It is well known that the RSS did not contribute to our freedom struggle. Its founder, Hedgewar, was in the Indian National Congress but left it because he was against all religious communities joining the anti-British freedom struggle led by Gandhi. A biography of Hedgewar published by the RSS describes how he parted with the INC because “Gandhiji worked constantly with one eye on Hindu–Muslim unity… But Doctorji sensed danger in that move. In fact, he did not even relish the newfangled slogan of ‘Hindu–Muslim Unity’.” [Seshadri, H. V. (ed.), Dr. Hedgewar, the Epoch-Maker: A Biography, Sahitya Sindhu, Bangalore, 1981, p. 61.]
2. The RSS opposes democracy and has consistently demanded a dictatorship. Golwalkar, in 1940, declared, “RSS inspired by one flag [saffron], one leader and one ideology.” [M. S. Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagra Darshan (collected works of Golwalkar in Hindi), Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, n.d., Volume I, p. 11.]
3. Should we forget what happened to the Muslims of Gujarat under the RSS’s proxy rule? “Daughters were gang-raped in front of their fathers and then had their heads bashed in. Their fathers were doused with petrol and set on fire. Their property was looted. Their businesses were destroyed. And the police stood by and did nothing.” [Hindustan Times, New Delhi, March 21, 2002.]
4. For the RSS, Indian Muslims and Christians are ‘internal threats’ number one and two, respectively.
5. Golwalkar’s Bunch of Thoughts has a long chapter titled ‘Internal Threats’, in which Muslim and Christian citizens of India are described as threats number one and two, respectively. Golwalkar says that Muslim citizens should be treated with perpetual suspicion.
6. Of Christians, Golwalkar says that the community is “out to demolish not only the religious and social fabric of our life”. [Ibid., p. 193.]
7. It is under the RSS’s ideology that Muslims are being subjected to Hindu law in the name of the UCC. Christians are being targeted in the name of draconian “anti-conversion” laws. Not to forget the severe abuse of laws such as the UAPA.
My request to Bhagwat is that he should just recite choice extracts from the poisonous works of Savarkar, Hedgewar, Golwalkar, etc. Let people decide what they make of the RSS.

[Jeremy Corbyn @jeremycorbyn]

Israel has said that paper kites flown by Palestinian children will be treated as weapons of war.

Read that again.

This is the reality of genocide: the total destruction of innocence, freedom and joy.

End all military cooperation with Israel, now.

[راجيٰ |𓂆 𝗥𝗮𝗷𝗶 @_Raji__]

Remember right now an entire nation is living in tents. For three years.

[Naz @nazirullahjufri]

Palestine before war. What a lovely country ❤️❤️

[منّان @MohammadMannan]

They have made it so normalised that no one in the world is batting an eye

[Mohammed Zubair @zoo_bear]

Is this ok @narendramodi ji. 👋

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

Idiotic

If you want to hold this position, then be consistent and say that you do not believe that everyone has to call Germany's actions during WWII a genocide.

There is infinitely more evidence of Israel's genocide than Germany's.

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

Jewish doctrines that Muslims didn't "copy":

- the notion of a divinely-chosen race

- the notion that other races are animals, and that the best of them should be killed (i.e., "kill the best of the gentiles")

- the notion that God gets tired and needs to rest

- the notion that God must submit to the decree of Rabbis (i.e., Oven of Akhnai)

- the notion that Moses' law is overridden by Rabbis (i.e., Moses not understanding Rabbi Akiva)

- the notion that it is permissible to cheat other groups, not pay them their wages, not pay back their debts, and steal from them

- the notion that it one should hide the crimes of one's group (e.g., tax evasion, child abuse) from the authorities (i.e., the law of mesira)

- the notion that one should fabricate claims that various groups (e.g., Romans, Babylonians) have killed tens of millions of one's people for no reason (e.g., the Talmudic claim that the Roman emperor Vespasian killed up to 40 million Jews in the city of Beitar).

- the notion that God commands the deliberate killing of men, women, and children

- the notion that Maraym is a prostitute and Jesus is in hell, burning in a vat of feces

[ًً @kelevitch]

Does this retard think islam is a company or what

[Andrey X @the_andrey_x]

This is Sheikh Farouk Ramadan.

Yesterday afternoon, he and his family were attacked by settler-terrorists on their own land. Farouk managed to disarm one of the attackers. He took the settler's rifle and shot and killed two terrorists in a clear act of self-defence.

In response, Israeli soldiers murdered him and three of his family members. Israeli government and media portrays him as the terrorist, and the actual terrorists as the victims.

Don't let them push this narrative. Farouk had the full legal and moral right to resist against the genocidal terrorists who invaded his land.

[Abier @abierkhatib]

It’s time to normalize the phrase “Jewish terrorists” when discussing Jewish-violence against Palestinians. Consistency matters, if “Islamic terrorists” is acceptable language, so is “Jewish terrorists”

[The Zillennial American @ZillennialAm]

You are a Jewish terrorist.

[Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani @NYCMayor]

Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal.

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

Islam encourages believers to conceal their sins and not boast about them or reveal them without reason.

However, at present, feminist reformist imams are applying this principle in increasingly questionable ways.

They say that it is permissible for a woman to actively lie about her sexual history (rather than simply keeping silent about it) to deceive prospective grooms.

It is claimed that this is justified, because the woman is simply concealing her sins.

But the relevant principle can be applied in this manner, why couldn't an already married woman actively lie about her ongoing affair to conceal her sins? (E.g., if the travelling husband calls and asks if she is with another man, she lies and says she is not).

Moreover, why couldn't an already married woman actively lie about her future plans to commit adultery (E.g., if the husband says he will permit his wife to go on a trip, but says she must not meet with other men, and then she lies and says she will not do this).

Note that the same reformist imams who push these ideas, frequently also claim (falsely) that a man may not secretly marry a second wife and hide this, as it is deception.

On their view, a woman is justified in concealing fornication before the marriage and secret adultery during the marriage. But a man may not conceal a legitimate second marriage.

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

You want to know why Christian countries have the highest rates of murder and degeneracy?

Unlike Islam, Christianity does not offer well-defined and detailed rules.

It does not offer well-defined and detailed rules for developing a close relationship with God through ritual practice.

It does not offer well-defined and detailed rules for regulating one's use of drugs and alcohol.

It does not offer well-defined and detailed rules for regulating sexuality, dress, gender roles, and marital relations.

It does not offer well-defined and detailed rules for preserving a shared culture, tradition, and state.

On the contrary, Christianity repudiates such rules in favor of vague ethical standards which are easily ignored and manipulated.

It also emphasizes forgiveness over punishment and responsibility.

As a result, Christian populations have statistically higher rates of every form of antisocial behavior.

They fornicate more, engage in more prostiuttion, drink more, use and sell more drugs, while also stealing more, raping more, and committing more homicides.

They do all this, and then dodge punishment and responsibility by claiming they have already been forgiven by Jesus.

In this way, Chrisitanity has transformed most of the Global South into a violent ghetto filled with broken families, drugs, and prostitution.

It is laughably wrong to say that this has nothing to do with Christianity's actual teachings.

Rather this situation reflects the broader social impact of such teachings.

To avoid dealing with this obvious fact, Christian apologists claim that true Christianity is found in the wealthy secular countries in the Global North.

But the populations of these countries are actually agnostic and atheist, and even if we were to count them as Christian, they constitute a small fraction of the global Christian population.

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

Why can't White Nationalists convert to Islam?

The inconveneient truth for nationalists is they pick and choose which aspects of their history/heritage they believe to be essential to their identity.

No White Nationalist, for example, says that we MUST ride horses instead of drive cars because that is what our ancestors did.

No White Nationalist says that we MUST abandon modern English/European languages and speak the idiom of the Middle Ages, etc.

So why is Christianity such a non-negotiable?

The reality is, Christianity has been completely destroyed by modernity.

The only Christianity that remains is a husk of empty symbols.

Modern Christians are just larping, and if their Christian forefathers saw what modern Christians believe and how they live, they would burn them as heretics.

Furthermore, Christianity itself laid the groundwork historically for the same modernity that has ravished humanity. Liberal secular modernity rose from the Protestant Reformation, that rose from the corruption and tehological deviation of the Church.

Why would any critic of the modern world desire to swallow the source of the poison?

Islam, however, is the answer. Islam has not reformed, has not bent the knee to liberal secularism. Islam offers a coherent, compelling understanding of the universe and human nature, human purpose, and matches that with a functional, practical guide for how to live life, how to organize families and societies, how to establish an economic system that is not usurious, etc., rather than vague Christian prescriptions like "be a good person," etc.

And Islam also does not prohibit freedom of association. This is why Egyptians can live with Egyptians, Malaysians with Malaysians, Turks with Turks, etc. All that Islam acknowledges is that all Muslims are brothers, no race is superior, and we help each other. But beyond that, tribes can associate with whomever they choose.

There is literally no reason for you not to become Muslim. The only objections you have are low-IQ memes that originated with Talmudic Jews who invented them to get you to hate Muslims and support forever wars in the Middle East.

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

France demands the full assimilation of Muslims, along with schools that ban Arabic, Muslim symbols, and dress (e.g., hijabs).

Meanwhile, in Muslim lands, France demands the non-assimilation of Christians, along with schools that teach French and utilize Christian religious symbols, and dress (e.g., crosses, absence of veils).

Supporters of French policies celebrate movies (e.g., Citizen Vigilante) where non-assimilated Muslims are gunned down.

However, they consider the gunning down of non-assimilated Christians to be terrorism.

French double standards reflect their ongoing efforts to maintain neo-colonial dominance over Muslim lands.

[JonnyUtd @Fx1Jonny]

iSRAEL TORTURED A 10 MONTH OLD BABY TO GET INFORMATION OUT OF HIS DAD!!!!!

FUCK THIS WORLD!!!