Jackadz

“I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned.” Richard P. Feynman

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

.

[Scottish Unity - Edinburgh Group 🐭 @scojw]

Now more than ever - DO NOT TAKE PART IN THE LIE
Live your life as your truth, and show it to others. Inspire them to follow.

[Propaganda & co @propandco]

Watch the full podcast here

https://t.co/TymEM9Cwlc

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@QBCCIntegrity They are even worse than the major parties if that’s possible. Completely owned by globalists and pretending to be the party to rescue us.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@leckie_cameron The evil strategies at work are mind blowing.
Have you ever come across Agent131711 on Substack and his 12 part series about WW11. Particularly interesting and shocking is The History Heist Part 6.
We know history is written by the victors but not at the level exposed here.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@JohnCleese Why don’t you and your simple minded mates go and fight for Ukraine.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@MissMillMoll123 @AislingOLoughl1 @ManAboutMourne @FrancisxONeill It’s myself you are being disrespectful to you idiot.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@MissMillMoll123 @AislingOLoughl1 @ManAboutMourne @FrancisxONeill You’re free to think what you like. So am I. Your post is an example of disrespectful and incompetent writing merely to abuse with hyperbolic low grade language.
It doesn’t take much to beat.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@MissMillMoll123 @AislingOLoughl1 @ManAboutMourne @FrancisxONeill That’s your exaggerated interpretation which is intended to belittle and smear.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@PollyWi92611992 What happened in Palestine was/is the testing ground for the rest of the world.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@myletrinh123 Will this help your case?

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Hero Dr. Meryl Nass just WON in court after Maine’s Medical Board suspended her and ordered a ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’ for daring to prescribe ivermectin and defy the Covid Scam orthodoxy…

THANK YOU for your bravery and for taking on the Medical Cartel 🙏🏻

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@JamieAA_Again It was a seal that died. One seal.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@ArmstrongT97969 @54JohnBull The Russians were infiltrated and murdered by the usual suspects and the UK was crucial to the operation. You think the history you learnt at school was true.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@RamMcDee I suggest you get more than two followers and then learn how to construct a decent sentence.

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

Remarkable woman.
(I tried retweeting this but the retweet button was not working??)

[Jacqui Deevoy @JacquiDeevoy1]

In 2003, a 28-year-old translator working for British intelligence received an email she wasn’t supposed to see. What she read convinced her that governments were trying to manipulate the world into war.
Her name was Katharine Gun.
She worked at GCHQ - Britain’s top-secret intelligence agency. On January 31, 2003, she received an email from senior NSA official Frank Koza. The US wanted British intelligence to help spy on members of the UN Security Council.
Specifically, diplomats from Angola, Chile, Pakistan, Cameroon, Guinea and Bulgaria - nations whose votes could decide whether the UN backed the invasion of Iraq. The operation was simple: bug phones, read private emails, uncover secrets, weaknesses, fears and anything that could pressure diplomats into supporting the war.
Katharine read the email in disbelief.
This was not ordinary intelligence gathering: it looked like an attempt to manipulate the UN into approving a war. She knew what leaking the document could cost her. Prison.
The destruction of her career. Under Britain’s Official Secrets Act, she could face years behind bars for exposing classified intelligence. But she leaked the email anyway. On March 2, 2003, The Observer newspaper published the secret NSA request on its front page.
Suddenly, the world could see evidence that intelligence agencies were allegedly targeting UN diplomats ahead of the Iraq War vote.
Inside GCHQ, panic exploded. Investigators began interrogating employees, searching for the source of the leak, monitoring staff and creating an atmosphere of fear throughout the building. Katharine watched innocent coworkers fall under suspicion. That’s when she made another decision that stunned people around her. She confessed. Rather than allow others to suffer for something she’d done, Katharine walked into her manager’s office and admitted she was responsible.
She was arrested.
Suspended from her job. Formally charged under the Official Secrets Act.
By late 2003, she faced trial at London’s Old Bailey with the possibility of being sent to prison. But her legal defence created a dangerous problem for the British government when her lawyers argued she acted to prevent an illegal war. To challenge that claim, the government would need to release confidential legal advice discussing whether the Iraq invasion itself was lawful under international law.
Then came February 25, 2004. The courtroom filled.
Katharine Gun sat waiting as prosecutors prepared to move forward against one of the most famous intelligence leaks in modern British history. Then, without warning, the government collapsed the case.
“The Crown offers no evidence.”
After months of preparation, the trial ended almost instantly. Katharine walked free. Many observers believed the government feared the public release of its own private legal doubts surrounding the Iraq War more than it feared letting the whistleblower go.
Years later, former Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg called Katharine Gun’s leak one of the bravest acts he had ever seen.
Edward Snowden would later cite her as one of the people who proved intelligence systems could be challenged from the inside. And perhaps the most remarkable part of the story was this:
Katharine Gun was not a politician.
Not a famous activist.
Not a powerful insider.
She was simply a young translator who read one email and decided her conscience mattered more than her career.
Two governments.
Major intelligence agencies.
The full force of secrecy laws.
And one woman still chose to stand up and speak out.
After the case was dismissed, reporters asked whether she regretted leaking the document.
Katharine Gun answered calmly:
“I have no regrets. I would do it again.”

WE ALL NEED TO BE THIS BRAVE. WE ALL NEED TO DO THE RIGHT THING. WE ALL NEED TO BE MORE LIKE KATHARINE GUN.

Good morning, everyone!

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@AislingOLoughl1 @ManAboutMourne @FrancisxONeill Are you done yet Aisling? You came on the attack to Francis and Miri with literally nothing to attack them with.
Are you being paid, threatened or otherwise intimidated to attack the two most respected and competent writers in this space?
And all to make a fool of yourself?

[Cameron Leckie @leckie_cameron]

1. Food security concerns have reached 🇦🇺 State media

@IanVerrender via @abcnews

This should have been the focus since 1 March 2026

As I have repeatedly highlighted in multiple posts via Substack

https://t.co/Ko6rUrThTQ

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

Pidgeons are canaries. ‼️
In the biggest coal mine in the world.
Humans take note.
Top Substack by Miri.

[Mark Finch @MarkFinch535327]

Neither are humans, but there are definitely those who do all they can to convince us that we are precisely that.

Please see here: https://t.co/tSbEW4ACUb

[Mark Finch @MarkFinch535327]

They are wonderful, and they still instinctively trust humans, they ho are now (not always having been) largely indifferent to them.

So what changed, and why?

Please see here: https://t.co/tSbEW4ACUb

[Cameron Leckie @leckie_cameron]

1. Never have I seen such gibberish

As this word salad via @ASPI_org

Which highlights a pathetically desperate attempt to cling to the tail of a declining hegemon

No matter the whiplash
https://t.co/CiDcVEmcXk

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@DavidPocock @PollyWi92611992 After a 0.05% death rate was called a pandemic…..no

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@Mon4Kooyong @PollyWi92611992 What a surprise. Who would have thought.🙄

[Jackadz @00Olmolungring]

@AislingOLoughl1 @ManAboutMourne @FrancisxONeill It’s the way you use things against people in order to insinuate and smear them. No I don’t think there is anything weird about Francis posting your photos from your very public life. What is weird is the way you have gone after Miri and Francis with nothing but your ill intent.