@tonygig@BenjaminSolak Because it doesn't fit the narrative. It's a lose lose situation for the Pats. Had they won the 8-10 games everyone predicted before the season it would've been a failure of a season. Now that they're going to the super bowl, it's the "let's discredit the season"
@SavageSports_ On the off chance you're right, I highly doubt that because this ownership group sucks, Bichette will be traded away as soon as possible. The second Devers signed his extension Henry wanted him gone.
@RealAlexBarth You have the wrong perspective on this. FSG has made it clear that the @RedSox are no longer viewed as a sports franchise, but an asset in its portfolio. Obviously all owners want a ROI, but FSG is only in this now for profits. If the on field product sucks, oh well.
@Steve_Perrault@Mike_L_OBrien All the more reason the @RedSox need to sign Burnes. Having a "platoon" in the 5th spot of the rotation of Giolito/Crawford would be nice.
@SavageSports_ Henry isn't paying Soto or anyone else. I strongly believe that Devers only got that contract because someone told Henry if they didn't the @RedSox would no longer be an asset in the portfolio.
@ezlazar I wouldn't say it's easier, but a cornerstone at LT outweighs anything we can get at WR. As we've seen in the preseason, it's kinda hard to get anything going on offense when the defense is always in the backfield.