The outrage over men watching porn and the nonstop shaming of men as โincelsโ exists for one reason: sexual control.
This isnโt about menโs health, morality, or โsavingโ anyone. Women pushing this narrative donโt actually care about men they just hate men having sexual autonomy they canโt regulate.
Porn isnโt the problem; men opting out of control is. The shaming is a tool, not concern, and the goal is obedience, not well-being.
Porn breaks that dynamic. A man who can satisfy himself does not need to chase women for sex, validation, attention, relationships, or money. Thatโs the real threat.
When men opt out whether by choice or circumstanceโฆwomen lose attention. And attention is the currency here. Less chasing means less power. Thatโs why porn is framed as evil, immoral, or addictive while female sex toys, vibrators, and erotica are labelled
Women Empowerment sexual liberation, taking control of their sexuality, breaking historical sexual stigmas, yasss queen, clock it, ๐ ๐พ No campaigns against that.
Notice the hypocrisy?
No think pieces. No โstudiesโ warning about female sexual autonomy. The outrage is laser-focused on men watching porn. Why? Because female sexuality is leverage; male sexual independence is rebellion.
Porn is competition. And itโs competition women canโt control.
This isnโt about concern. Itโs about leverage.
And porn threatens it.
๐จMaresca on Palmer: "Yes, he is okay. He is better, he is available at the moment with one more session available. He finished the session with us with a mixed feeling but he is okay."
On Wesley Fofana: "He is fine, completely fine."