@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek He had just committed a homicide. Yes, he should have done anything other than run. You sound like a fool. If this had been anyone other than an alt right kid you would say exactly the opposite.
You bias is showing again. You are clownish.
@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek You are making bad faith assumptions based on your personal animus and bias.
You in fact have no evidence to support other than your personal hatred.
Cope harder.
@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek There were police all over. He did not have to go to them, he could have called them on his phone.
@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek Maybe start by not shooting anyone. But also. Yes. A submissive and disarmed person is unlikely to be the target of harm, regardless of your bs assumptions about people you donβt like.
@ShowMeKC2 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Andrew_Havranek The facts are facts. They are things that happened. Not you bias. The fact is that only one person killed anyone.
@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek K has lied, there is no reason to believe he is telling the truth about it being sarcasm, nor is there evidence it was understood as such.
Running away, or running to shoot someone else. As long as he had the rifle still warm from murder, he is an active shooter.
@F3BigSarge @Andrew_Havranek I have also watched it. Start to finish. The only way to assume set defense is if you start from the bad faith assumption that the protestors would have killed him. There is no evidence that is true.
Just because you hate the protestors does not make their murder justice.
@GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek Dismissed it yes. Does not mean that he complied with all the laws. Registration, permits, etc. just that the specific length of barrel question is difficult.
Basically itβs just possible it was a misunderstanding, but that does not make it legal.
@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek No one is claiming it was a question. K claimed it was sarcasm which is not a defense.
Except K was an active shooter as he continued to shoot people. When he ran it is reasonable to attempt to stop him. Especially since he did not disarm or call the police.
@GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek That isnβt actually true. He acquired the gun illegally and there are limits on the 2A.
He went there provoking the violence and adding to it. A crisis tourist is the right word.
@lilman0700 @GuacaFlakaFlame @Godsplan671@Andrew_Havranek What happened to a good guy with a gun stopping an active shooter?
Yes. He did, K admitted he confirms to someone he did.
@kennyontheweb @GodsloveUche@VartioArtel@Andrew_Havranek After K had already killed someone and did not disarm. He continued to point the weapon. He never disengaged.
@GodsloveUche @kennyontheweb @VartioArtel@Andrew_Havranek They were attempting to stop him, after he ran from a murder scene. There is no evidence they would have killed K.