sagar singh dhami

engineer; learning how systems coordinate

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

Golang's interface design is quite interesting. Rather than forcing implements like mechanism (in Java), it opts for the "fulfill contract" mechanism. I am not sure if I am grasping it right

[Vidit Gujrathi @viditchess]

Chess engines tell you the best move.

But grandmasters are human, they don’t always play it.

So I built "Kibitz": a human move predictor for chess broadcasts. I trained this model on my Nvidia RTX 5080.

Then I made it run as a business by itself.

A channel buys the overlay, Hermes onboards them, charges via @stripe test mode, runs the broadcast, narrates with @NVIDIAAI Nemotron, tracks inference cost, and books its own P&L.

I build. Hermes operates.

This is my demo and entry for the @NousResearch × @NVIDIAAI × @stripe Hermes Agent Accelerated Business Hackathon.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

power law is everywhere (almost)

[voided intern @voidedintern]

MrBeast reveals why a 10% better video gets you four times the views, not 10% more

"I mentor YouTubers a lot. One of the people I've been mentoring recently, he was doing $24,000 a month and then he recently had a $400,000 a month on YouTube."

"He was doing 4 million views a month, 24 grand. And then probably like seven, eight months into it we got him up to 45 million views."

"It's much easier, as weird as it sounds, it's much easier to get five million views on one video than a hundred thousand views on 50 videos."

"You could upload one great video a year and get more views than if you uploaded 100 mediocre videos."

"If you get people to click your video 10% more and watch a video 10% longer than mine, you don't get 10% more views. You get like four times the views. A 10% better video is four times the views, not 10% more views."

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

@IndianTechGuide seems like an interesting bet.

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

Rubiks cube and graph theory.

[🎞️ jagarikin]

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

@kiiradesign actually you are right. though, it is pretty hard to not doomscroll on these platforms . I would like to add a layer of intentionality.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

learning should fundamentally start with curiousity and the curriculum should come later. I have come to believe that struggling with a wrong prototype first or making wrong assumptions is a far better way to learn anything than accumulating perfect facts.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

I built a learning tracking CLI tool which uses SRS for reviewing concepts/ problems on regular basis. It is very raw and unpolished for now. I mainly use it for my own learning. https://t.co/9C5IqpssY6

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

I have a two month break before I start my 4th year in college. I intend to build some depth during this period. job period will be coming up, so have to do DSA, but would alongside focus on building understanding with go internals.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

I have heard about go concurrency model. but I want to go deep into it and actually get the idea what makes it so special.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

cool

[Dhruv @dhruvtwt_]

This is the most beautiful and intuitive website for explaining computer principles that I've ever seen

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

@theJayAlto I think there is no one thing. It is mostly about interpretation. For me personally, an anime called fullmetal alchemist brotherhood stands on top; it made me realize a lot of things which I can't put in words.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

writing again; this time more consistently.

[David Deutsch @DavidDeutschOxf]

Amaze! Amaze! Amaze!: https://t.co/P6OXoPOlwR

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

I am not sure; but actually sitting with problems and struggling has taught me quite a lot; but it is hard to put into words. But I guess, sitting with hard problems is a serious skill and worth learning in my view.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

for some time, I have been trying to focus on a single thing: algorithmic thinking. it feels too generic and at times feel I am missing out on something larger, but I choose this bet anyway.

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

after spending around 2-3 months regularly spending time on problem solving and actually trying to think about problem; I find that getting good at one thing at thing often implies one is getting good at lot of composite skills.

[K @iiamkrshn]

Pov: Me as a sperm cell beating 17 potential scientists and 12 president so i can watch reels 8 hours daily

[sagar singh dhami @0x1engineer]

@TheGeorgePu this is some insane proof of work