not like we care like that
we're only holding megaeth to their own standard: "we never paid for listing"
FINE
but at least admit that there's some sort of commercial agreement between both parties
there's mega on binance earn offering 12% apy, and someone is definitely funding the yield
did binance buy onchain to fund that? lmeow hell no
how many of you remember these projects ?
lot of people will say they sidelined communities but that is only when you are looking at things unmagnified
the moment you zoom in, you see :
monad cooking for nads
og labs cooking for ogurus
kite cooking for social campaign
eclipse cooking for ogs
common cooking for its nft
boundless cooking for everyone
except few like anoma (they were pure scam)
the point ?
even after launching bad, people complaining that majority of community was sidelined yet see how :
a group of people was winning in every bad/scammy project and your goal should exactly to be in that small circle
and i am pretty sure that this will repeat soon, we will again see : a set of people winning in upcoming project launches even from mid tier projects
so whatever you have your conviction, hold on it, find your way to the top in that p
and you will see yourself cooking in next 2-4 months
see you on the side that prints
Are you still posting videos every day but getting the same 47 views Abike collections gets on her WhatsApp status?
I have been watching this space for a while now. I have seen people become millionaires without ever showing their face while others struggle with perfection. The difference is not luck. It is understanding something that most people completely miss.
Let me tell you about two creators that will blow your mind.
Creator A has been making faceless videos for 2 years. Animation style. Good voice over. Posts consistently. His channel has 5,000 subscribers and most videos get 300 views. He makes videos about "life lessons" with generic stock footage and basic animations.
Creator B started 8 months ago. Also faceless. Also animation. But he studied something different. He noticed that the most successful faceless channels were not just sharing information. They were creating experiences. So instead of making "5 life lessons for success", he makes "What happens to your brain when you fail for the 100th time". Today his smallest video probably has 200,000 views.
Same niche. Same format. Different approach to the same hunger.
This is what I call understanding the psychology behind faceless content.
Here is what most people do not understand about faceless YouTube. People are not watching because they cannot see your face. They are watching because you are giving them something they cannot get anywhere else. If you give them the exact thing others are giving them, why exactly should they watch yours?
Look at channels like Bob Invests. They make finance videos with simple stick animations. But they are not really teaching deep stuff about finance. They are selling curiosity. They make you feel smart for understanding complex things.
Look at The Infographics Show. Simple stick figure animations. But they are not just sharing facts. They are feeding people's hunger for "what if" scenarios. What if you were trapped on a deserted island? What if zombies were real?
That is the Content DNA you must understand.
Your job is not to make faceless content. Your job is to find what emotional experience you can create without showing your face.
I remember when I first cracked this code in storytelling. I was studying a small faceless channel with only 15,000 subscribers but somehow every video was getting 1 million views. Impossible numbers. Until I watched closely. I proceeded to make over 12k that month with less than 5k subscribers.I
Instead of making videos about "conversations you have in your head". Not generic self help. Specific internal conversations. "What your brain tells you at 3am when you cannot sleep". "The argument you have with yourself before asking someone out".
They understood something powerful. The most engaging content is not about external things. It is about internal experiences that people think only they have.
That became my first rule for faceless content. Make people feel less alone in their own thoughts.
Now here is where most faceless creators fail completely. They think faceless means lazy. They use basic stock footage, robot voices, and zero personality.
Honestly, that's not bad if the goal is to cash out fast before inauthentic policy hits.
The most successful faceless channels have more personality than most face channels. How? Through their voice. Through their storytelling. Through their unique perspective.
Develop your voice personality. Are you the wise teacher? Are you the funny friend? Are you the brutally honest mentor? Pick one and commit to it completely.
Now let me share the biggest mistake I see faceless creators make.
They pick the wrong topics.
Faceless content works best for topics that are either too personal to discuss face to face or too complex to explain with just talking.
Perfect topics for faceless: embarrassing problems, deep psychology, complex explanations, controversial opinions, personal stories you cannot tell openly.
Bad topics for faceless: surface level advice, generic motivation, basic tutorials, anything that needs human connection to work.
Here is my challenge for you. Find the most successful faceless channel in your niche. Now study their last 10 videos. Write down the pattern. Are they solving embarrassing problems? Are they explaining complex things simply? Are they giving people permission to think differently?
Find the pattern. That is your content DNA.
But here is something nobody tells faceless creators.
Your biggest advantage is also your biggest challenge.
Your advantage? People judge your content purely on value. No bias about how you look or sound. Your ideas must be strong enough to stand alone.
Your challenge? You cannot build personal connection the normal way. You must build connection through shared experiences and emotions.
The solution? Become obsessed with your audience's internal world.
I know a faceless creator who reads 100 comments every day. Not just on his videos. On every video in his niche. He writes down every problem people mention. Every question they ask. Every fear they express.
Then he makes videos that address these specific internal struggles. Not general advice. Specific solutions for specific problems that real people told him about.
His videos feel like he can read minds because he literally studies what people are thinking about.
This is how you win at faceless content. Not with better animation or better voice. With better understanding of what people are actually struggling with.
Here is the blueprint that works.
Step one: Find successful faceless channels and understand their emotional hook. What feeling do they create? What internal experience do they provide?
Step two: Develop your voice personality. Decide how you want people to feel when they hear you talk.
Step three: Make your visuals work with your words. Every image should enhance your message, not distract from it.
Step four: Pick topics that work better without a face. Personal struggles. Complex ideas. Controversial thoughts.
Step five: Study your audience's internal world. Read their comments. Understand their real problems. Give them exactly what they are hungry for.
Faceless YouTube is not easier than face YouTube. It is just different. But when you understand the difference, you can build something that no face creator can compete with.
Got it? Repost please
@mztacat This shit is so obvious, I’m surprised no one is seeing it or talking about it. Each day I lose respect for these washed up KOLs.
Stay away from huddles guys!!!!!
@Zun2025@morsyxbt@SentientAGI If there have been a lot of project who initiated the ‘codes to access testnet’ thing and performed poorly….. does this one doing well invalidate the hundreds of projects that flopped using the codes system?