Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect

Exposing Sybil clusters & relay patterns /
91% accuracy in detecting rugs before /
Stop being exit liquidity.

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

https://t.co/9u2dVzEyAU

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@tvbzify a couple days ago I'd say $ASTEROID but it's too late now
almost every token I've looked into is actually a trap where the dev holds most of the supply and just waits for you to pump the price so he can dump on you

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

Alcohol isn't a solution to problems, it's an attempt to avoid solving them
If you're broke, alcohol won't help you
If you're dumb, alcohol will make you even dumber
If you're sick, alcohol will take away what's left of your health

And the funniest part, you'll defend your addiction and sincerely enjoy it, until it's too late

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@HopiumPapi peaceful vibe but violent chart setup
30 wallets hold 48% of supply and every funder traces through relays

the calm ends the second they start selling into you

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@cryptocupra every cycle someone posts this and every cycle half the people who lock in get rekt by the same bundled launches they swore they would avoid this time

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@0xSweep Maybe they're just randomly tweaking different metrics and right now they "just got lucky" that these metrics turned out well and there are fewer bots
I suspect the X devs themselves don't fully understand how this whole system works under the hood

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@soapweb3 the one where the top 40 holders were not funded by the same wallet 2 hours before launch

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@NBweb3_ every "fully trust" reply is going to be someone's bag they need filled

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@GoingHome092324 Looks like it

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

28/100 on $assface
genuinely low score, top holder under 2.3%, no whale dominance, liquidity thin around 51k.

what nags me: 37 of 39 largest holders sitting in profit
one in the red, one unknown, nobody caught a bad entry

77% of them came in through relay hops

three clusters stacked to roughly 13% of supply combined, and the strongest one is two wallets wiring SOL between each other

score is fair
the PnL wall tells you who ate first

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@MarcellxMarcell Fuck this FOMO, new opportunities pop up on this market all the time. Most of those who stayed in $ASTEROID won't end up taking any meaningful profit, they'll either take it earlier than the right price or later.

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

Not 2%, way more than that.
In DeFi even stablecoins give you way higher yields, around 4-6%.
The point of DeFi isn't to give you 100x, it's to boost an already strong portfolio of assets like BTC.
Imagine, you buy BTC and just wait 3-5 years for it to pump, but instead of just sitting waiting for those percentages to drip in, you can put that asset as collateral on a lending market, borrow ETH against it for example, and open a position with that ETH in a liquidity pool earning 20-30% a year. And you're NOT missing out on the growth of your main asset (BTC).

It's a powerful tool but requires serious protocol audits.

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@bon_g every Elon adjacent mascot token I have checked this cycle had the same cluster signature behind the early buys. the narrative sells itself, the wallets always tell on themselves about a week in

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

$Jared sitting at 31/100

not critical but the plumbing is loud. 80% of holders funded through relay wallets and a 13 wallet cluster is already sitting on 9.9% of supply

low score today

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@Jeremybtc happens every cycle. ticker collisions are basically a scam category at this point, one real launch and ten copycats launching within the hour hoping someone fat-fingers the wrong contract

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

33/100 on $SOULANA low risk but not clean.

four separate clusters of 2-4 wallets each bought within seconds of one another. different clusters, same pattern repeated. somebody is running multiple small groups rather than one big sybil.

83% of funders come through single-use wallets. the number alone would normally push into high risk, but the holder list actually has real traders. 20 in loss, 13 in profit, entry prices spread across orders of magnitude. the losers are what saves the score.

LP is burned. top holder is an exchange. the clusters combined hold under 12% so even if they coordinate a dump it is survivable.

not a rug setup. just a launch that had a few small groups piling in together and hoping nobody checks.

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@y0lloo Overall the technical side looks decent, there's no massive sybil farm here, there are some small wallet clusters among the top holders, but it doesn't look like coordinated action

the token is pretty safe from a hard rug perspective

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@gem_detecter 42 wallets sitting on 32% of supply with positions 21-40 spread inside a 0.13% band
that is not whales rotating, that is one operator pretending to be forty.

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@jeremyct the addiction is not the money
it is the belief that the next one will be the one that works

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@btctatex0 ironclad conviction in a token where 42 wallets quietly hold 32.4% of supply is a bold position

positions 21 through 40 sit in a 0.67 to 0.79 range, which is not where real buyers land

[Eugene Baranov | Solana Security Architect @0xKodaDev]

@The__Solstice 42 wallets quietly holding a third of the supply, all sized within a hair of each other so they blend in past the obvious top slots

retail is the dumb money here, and it is not the ones being rallied into $DUMBMONEY