This is our 9th year in crypto
Nine years providing liquidity and staying active through every market condition
Today we're launching Armitage
Our take on vault curation, starting with two USDC vaults on @Morpho
if youβre asking me a question about how to improve opsec you should def check out SEAL Frameworks
https://t.co/S3wQ24DAXG
literally all of this was written by real people in this space, for real people on this space.
I beg everyone in crypto to read this in full.
I expected this to be another case of social engineering, likely some recruiter/job offer shit.
I was very wrong.
And the depth of the operation and personas makes me think they already have multiple other teams on lock.
π³
People might accuse me of grave dancing for saying it
But we have to stop letting centralized things call themselves DeFi
Admin key can drain all funds? CeFi
Otherwise DeFi means nothing and itβs brand is destroyed
No admin key can drain any version of Uniswap for a reason
Yeah, but one thing you don't know is that most shady Asian business uses Tron chain for off/on ramping.
eg: Online gambling, underground banker, MLMs and etc.
π¨ Goose Finance - Loss $8435 (2026-03-12)
Token: $EGG @ $0.00307
MC: $223K
24h Vol: $29.5K
Type: Logic Error (Share Accounting Flaw)
The StrategyGooseEgg vault had 3.69M EGG (~$11.3K) sitting unaccounted in the contract β not reflected in wantLockedTotal or sharesTotal. The _deposit() function calculates shares using the OLD wantLockedTotal, then calls _farm() which adds BOTH the deposit AND the unaccounted EGG to wantLockedTotal. This means the depositor's shares entitle them to a proportional claim on the unaccounted EGG. The attacker flash-swapped 10.17M EGG from two PancakeSwap pairs, deposited into pool 60 via VaultChef, then immediately withdrew β receiving 12.59M EGG back. After two deposit/withdraw cycles, the attacker converted profits to ~13.04 BNB ($8435).
TX: https://t.co/Zyf6oj2XDH
Victim: https://t.co/EZPrz5WnQV (StrategyGooseEgg)
CoinGecko: https://t.co/CUMK4wUANy
No one likes getting charge with higher interest.
No one likes getting liquidated.
Higher interest based on LTV?
Why not offer a dynamic interest based on collateral?
Eg: BTC at 2.5% base rate, ETH at 3%
Create a position where these two assets as collateral and push the interest to a more attractive rate (2.75%)
@OpusMoney
why has no lending market explored the idea of making the calculation of interest charged be dependent on the LTV of a loan
the riskier a loan, the higher the interest the borrower pays
afaik only protocol that has smth along these lines is Maker with ETH-A, ETH-B...
I've been collecting the best prediction market writing for a while now. Finally turning it into something more useful for folks.
On Prediction is a curated hub for builders, investors, and researchers who want high quality takes without digging through noise.
Comment if you want this!