Solty

lost money learning markets. now AI pays for the lessons.

[Solty @0xSolty]

$4,460 setup. $11,000/month by month 3.

A 24-year old from Shenzhen straps this rig to his back every morning.

It sells raw compute power to AI startups in real time.

AWS waitlist: 23 days.
His waitlist: zero.

He shows up at conferences. People stop him.
He hands them a card.

3 clients per conference day at $1,200/month each.

That is $3,600 in new recurring revenue before he leaves the building.

The hardware paid for itself in month 2.

He did not find the clients.

The dashboard found them for him.

Full breakdown on how to copy this system exactly:

[Solty @0xSolty]

https://t.co/OKhsCWCvUZ

[Solty @0xSolty]

https://t.co/OKhsCWCvUZ

[Solty @0xSolty]

Nobody came to see the rack.

The camera crew came to film a story about a guy who builds things alone. No team. No funding. No office.

Just a room, a desk, and whatever he could afford.

He is 19.

They set up in his living room. Started filming. He walked them through the setup the way someone walks you through a room they know too well to notice anymore.

Four computers. Server rack. Custom brackets. Weeks of planning visible in every cable.

Then he picked up the watt meter.

Pause at 0:07.

Read the number on the left. Then read the number on the right.

The left number is four computers.

The right number is one switch.

He laughed when he showed them.

The crew did not immediately understand why.

Four machines. The kind of hardware that runs models most companies rent by the hour from data centers with raised floors and cooling systems and security badges.

32 watts.

He pointed the meter at the black box sitting below them. The switch. The thing that just moves data between the computers.

81 watts.

He laughed again.

The crew started to understand.

Somewhere in a data center right now, a rack of GPU servers is running the same models he is about to run. That rack draws more power than a small apartment. The company paying for it gets a bill every month that has four digits before the decimal.

He gets a power bill that will not change.

At the end of the shoot he said he wants to test it under load. Run the models. See what the number does.

The crew packed up their equipment.

The rack was still running when they left.

32 watts.

The switch was still the loudest thing in the room.

[Solty @0xSolty]

@Dan1ro0 The bot is cool

What stands out more is sustaining positive expectancy across 11k+ trades at high frequency. Most people can generate trade ideas with Claude. Very few can turn it into a repeatable process that compounds without blowing up

That’s the real edge here

[Solty @0xSolty]

Generating the video in under 60 seconds is the easy part now.

The real money is still in what happens after upload: retention past 30 seconds, CTR on the thumbnail, and whether the content actually makes people subscribe.

Most tools solve production. Very few solve distribution and watch time

[Solty @0xSolty]

La parte que más me gusta es que Claude actúa como orquestador real y pausa entre pasos para que puedas intervenir.

Que todo salga en archivos editables (.glb + Gaussian splat) en vez de un visor cerrado cambia bastante las cosas. Esto ya no es solo un demo, es algo que puedes seguir trabajando en Unity, Unreal o Blender.

Buen repo.

[Solty @0xSolty]

@ridark_eth Automating the cuts and b-roll is the easy part.

The real moat is having a reliable pipeline of clients who accept fully AI-edited videos with almost zero revisions.

Most people can build the automation. Very few can keep it consistently fed with paying work while they sleep.

[Solty @0xSolty]

She was working 6-hour shifts at a coffee shop making $14 an hour.

Every morning. Same apron. Same orders. Same $14.

One night she couldn't sleep.

Opened her phone. Started scrolling Google Maps for no reason.

Clicked on a nail salon near her apartment. 4.9 stars. 280 reviews. Women who drove 40 minutes just to come back.

No website.

She stared at that for a second.

Then opened Claude. Copied everything from the salon's profile. Asked it to write a prompt for a website.

Pasted that prompt into Webild.

97 seconds later she had a website that looked like it cost $3,000 to build.

She published it. Found the owner's number on Google Maps. Called her the next morning.

The owner picked up on the second ring.

She said: "I built a website for your salon. It's live right now. I can show you in 30 seconds."

Silence.

Then: "How much."

$1,200.

The owner said yes before she finished the sentence.

She made more in that phone call than in 85 hours at the coffee shop.

She went back to the coffee shop that afternoon.

Gave back the apron.

Didn't explain why.

The tools she used:
Google Maps. Free.
Claude. $20/month.
Webild. Free to build.

The nail salon still has the website.

It's still bringing in new clients every week.

She has 11 salons on monthly retainer now.

The coffee shop posted a hiring ad last Tuesday.

She saw it.

Kept scrolling.

https://t.co/DDDHPQcmka

[Solty @0xSolty]

https://t.co/WeG0F3OpRH

[Solty @0xSolty]

https://t.co/WeG0F3OpRH

[Solty @0xSolty]

The $20 to $5k math only works if you stop treating it like a smarter autocomplete.

The people actually making that money are using parallel subagents + persistent memory to ship full client deliverables in hours instead of days.

Most are still prompting for code snippets. Very few are already running multi-agent delivery systems.

[Solty @0xSolty]

The cron job is the easy part.

The hard part is making sure what it posts doesn’t slowly kill the account over 2–3 months. Most autonomous loops die from quality decay, not from technical failure.

Building the system is step one. Keeping it from quietly self-destructing is step two.

[Solty @0xSolty]

The model stopped being the product a while ago.

What actually ships is the system around it: routing logic, evaluation loops, cost/latency controls, memory, tool orchestration, and graceful fallback when the model hallucinates or times out.

Most people are still in “better prompt = better output” mode. The gap between that and something you can put in front of real users is bigger than most realize.

Single model prompting is now the equivalent of writing everything in one giant function. It works until it doesn’t.

[Solty @0xSolty]

This is the right way to use Fable 5.

Not “build me a full website”, but “give me the hard, high-skill pieces” (transmission shaders, liquid morph logic, performant particle drift) while you keep the architecture and libraries under your control.

The people shipping the cleanest stuff right now are the ones who use the model as a very fast, very good shader + animation engineer, not as a replacement for the entire stack.

Hybrid > pure generation.

[Solty @0xSolty]

The real story isn’t the MacOS clone.

It’s that the marginal cost of shipping a high-fidelity, clickable prototype just dropped from “small agency + 1-2 weeks” to “one structured prompt + $20 + 10 minutes”.

That changes the game completely.

Studios were selling the time and effort it took to make something interactive. Now clients can get something they can actually click and test for basically nothing. The value prop of traditional prototyping is evaporating in real time.

The only thing left that’s hard to copy is taste + speed of iteration.

[Solty @0xSolty]

The pool fence example is the one that actually matters.
Everyone’s losing their mind over Mario Kart clones and Windows in a browser, but the real unlock is turning public data + one model into a complete sales system with zero ad spend and zero cold outreach.
Homeowner gets instant visualization + trust. Contractor gets a warm lead that’s already half-sold. The guy in the middle takes the margin. No team, no website, no overhead.
This is the template. Not the games.

[Solty @0xSolty]

A restaurant in Basel has been open for 6 years.

4.8 stars. 340 reviews. Regulars who come every week.

No website.

Not because they couldn't afford one. Because nobody ever showed up with one already built.

Until last Tuesday.

A guy in a black beanie found them on Google Maps at 9am.

By 9:04 he had a finished website for their business. Professional photos. Menu. Reviews pulled in automatically. Mobile optimised.

He didn't call them. Didn't email them first. Didn't pitch anything.

He just built it. Then sent the link.

The tool he used: Frascati. AI website builder. One prompt. One minute.

His prompt was eleven words: "A modern website for 7 Paintings, a restaurant in Basel."

That was it.

The site that came back looked like it cost $3,000 to make.

It cost him nothing.

He published it. Copied the URL. Found their email on Google Maps. Sent it with three sentences:

"I built a website for your business. It's live right now. Here's the link let me know if you want to keep it."

No sales script. No Zoom call. No proposal deck.

Just a link.

$1,400 that week. Seven restaurants. Seven emails. Zero conversations.

Google Maps has 213 million businesses listed.

Roughly 40% have no website.

That's 85 million businesses waiting for someone to show up with a link.

Most people scroll past them every day.

He just started stopping.

[Solty @0xSolty]

https://t.co/WeG0F3OpRH

[Solty @0xSolty]

https://t.co/WeG0F3OpRH

[Solty @0xSolty]

Someone typed four words into Claude Fable 5.

"Make a Minecraft clone."

That was the entire prompt.

No code. No framework. No stack overflow. No senior developer.

Four words.

What came back: a fully playable 3D world. Terrain generation. Day and night cycle. Block placement. Physics.

In one response.

Two days ago Anthropic released Fable 5 to the public. It's their Mythos-class model. The one they spent two months deciding was too powerful to release.

They released it anyway.

The Minecraft clone took less time to generate than it takes to install Unity.

This is not a demo. This is not a benchmark.

This is what the new floor looks like.

[Solty @0xSolty]

@CaptainInsightX one C file from Bulgaria broke the entire “$10k GPU required” narrative. most legends have bigger origin stories than this.

[Solty @0xSolty]

$180 vs $600/month

He is 17. He built a device in his bedroom that works where GPS fails, where cell towers don’t exist, where Starlink costs $600 a month.

His version costs $180.

Here’s what he figured out.

Every Starlink satellite constantly broadcasts signal pings. Free. Public. Unencrypted. SpaceX has no legal right to stop anyone from receiving them.

He bought an RTL-SDR receiver for $35. A small dish antenna for $50. A Raspberry Pi. A power bank.

Then he opened Claude Opus 4.7

Described what he wanted in plain language. Claude wrote the entire Python program. Captures Starlink pings. Tracks satellites in real time. Calculates position via Doppler shift.

Accuracy: 10 to 30 meters. No GPS. No internet. No subscription.

He 3D-printed a case. Named it Hikers and Sailors GPS Backup.

Cost to build: $180.
Sale price: $899.
Units sold: 350.
Total revenue: $300,000.

His customers are fire crews. Pilots. Skiers. Yacht owners. People who go where the grid ends.

SpaceX’s lawyers looked at it.

Receiving publicly broadcast signals is completely legal.

There is nothing they can do.

A 17 year old in his bedroom found a gap in one of the most advanced satellite networks on earth.

He didn’t study engineering.

He described a problem to Claude and asked it to solve it.

The satellites pass overhead 24 hours a day.

Most people never look up.

He pulled it off.