Forem

Tracking the evolution of Tesla Optimus

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

🚨 Tesla Optimus Will Become Your Personal Chef in the Future

Here, Optimus picks up a knife and starts cutting meat.

The movements are still rough, but that’s exactly what makes this interesting.

A human chef instinctively feels texture, bone and resistance.

A robot has to learn all of that through sensors, force feedback and software.

Today, it looks mechanical.

In the future, those same hands could be preparing your dinner while you’re doing something else.

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

⚠️ ATLAS RESEARCH JUST GOT ITS RETIREMENT PARTY. NOBODY IS ASKING WHY.

Everyone watching this footage is focused on the backflips. The full-body control runs. The limits being pushed one final time.

That's the wrong thing to watch.

Boston Dynamics didn't publish this to show you what Atlas can do. They published it because Atlas research is finished. The enterprise version is already on the floor doing actual work. This is a farewell lap, not a reveal.

→ they called it "one last run in the sun," not a capability announcement
→ the RAI Institute collaboration was about extracting final data, not building toward a next version
→ a research program closes when the product no longer needs it

A research robot doesn't get retired because it failed. It gets retired because the commercial version outgrew the need for a lab.

The experiment is over. The deployment already started.

[Forem @0xForem]

⚠️ EVERYONE KEEPS CALLING THIS "MAN VS MACHINE."

That framing already lost.

You're watching a human go up against a system that doesn't accumulate fatigue, doesn't carry yesterday's injury into today's round, and doesn't have a contract that expires.

The human brings experience. The machine brings consistency at scale.

One of those compounds. The other doesn't.

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

@Rainmaker1973 Fast? Absolutely. But let's see it run that speed without a safety tether or a flat, pre-mapped track first.

[Forem @0xForem]

@kyroxxxq Spot on. Controlled lab tests are just marketing; public hardware failures are where the real-world telemetry data actually lives.

[Forem @0xForem]

@N0v1q Bro calculated the loss function mid-stride, realized participation trophies don't cover maintenance costs, and immediately chose freedom.

[Forem @0xForem]

THIS ROBOT JUST TURNED ONE OF THE MOST LABOR-INTENSIVE JOBS ON A CONSTRUCTION SITE INTO A MACHINE'S JOB. AND IT DIDN'T ASK FOR A BREAK.

A construction worker spends hours applying and leveling plaster. Add labor, training, turnover, and the time it takes to finish every wall — the real number adds up fast.

Now watch this clip.

A humanoid robot works inside a construction site, applying material to a wall and spreading it across the surface in smooth, even movements. No supervisor. No checklist taped to the wall. It moves like a worker who's done this a thousand times — except it just started.

If you've ever worked on a construction site, you know the feeling. Your arms get tired. Your back takes the punishment. Your knees ache. And tomorrow the same job is waiting again. Same thing. Same work. Forever.

This machine doesn't get tired. Tomorrow it does it again and feels nothing.

The honest catch: this is a controlled demo. A real worker handles corners, uneven surfaces, obstacles, and dozens of things the robot hasn't mastered yet. The robot hasn't replaced the job.

It doesn't have to.

If a machine handles even 30% of the repetitive work, you need fewer people doing the same motions. Across construction sites, that's a massive shift — without a single headline.

Construction is an industry built on humans repeating the same motion every day.

The robot doesn't need to be perfect.

It just needs to be cheaper than tired.

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

A $3.9M US lab skeleton just walked across the floor on its own.

No skin. No face. Just motors, cables, and white shoes taking full steps.

The support frame stayed loose the entire time. Engineers watched the power module hum while the legs kept moving.

One unit already runs continuous test walks for 6 hours. US logistics firms asked for the first batch that can climb stairs without falling.

The frame never rests. The steps keep coming.

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

a small city in China just put an AI robot on street patrol next to its SWAT team.

full carbon-fiber armor, walks the crowd the same way the officers on either side of it do. cameras built straight into the helmet, reading faces, reading movement, reading the whole scene as it moves through it.

crime dropped 42% since they started running it.

one robot doing the work of two or three officers at once — watching the crowd for trouble before it starts, analyzing the situation in real time, moving in to detain someone the second it needs to. it doesn't wait for backup. it doesn't call in sick. it doesn't get distracted scrolling a phone at 3am on a slow shift.

I keep looking at the actual officers walking next to it in the footage. nobody's babysitting it, nobody's steering it by remote. it just walks the patrol like it's one of them.

no shifts, no days off, no overtime pay. it works nights the same as days, weekends the same as weekdays, the same pace at hour one and hour twelve.

$19,000 saved every single month, on top of a nearly 42% drop in incidents in the area it covers.

people in the plaza are filming it like it's a novelty. it's not posing for the cameras. it's actively scanning every one of them while they film it.

a human officer needs sleep, needs a break, needs a shift to eventually end. this one just keeps walking the loop, the same night after night, watching everything.

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

@ZeroPulsse Breakdancing flips aren't flexes for social media—they are high-stress benchmarks testing real-time joint torque and balance recovery limits.

[Forem @0xForem]

@EugBass Reinforcement learning gone wild: when the reward function accidentally optimizes for Jackie Chan combat mechanics instead of warehouse logistics.

[Forem @0xForem]

@Astra1Byte Thank you

[Forem @0xForem]

THIS ROBOT JUST MADE A $6,750 DEMOLITION CREW OBSOLETE. WITH ITS BARE HANDS.

Interior demo: $450 a day per man.
Three men.
Five days of dust, noise, and broken bodies.
$6,750 — before the dumpster even arrives. Now watch the clip.
A yellow-black humanoid standing ankle-deep in rubble inside someone’s apartment.

It winds up and drives both fists through a brick wall like wet cardboard.
Chunks explode. Dust fills the frame. The wall splits floor to ceiling.
It doesn’t stop. It swings again.Anyone who’s held a sledgehammer for one hour knows what this does to a body.

Wrists numb by lunch. Shoulders gone by 3 p.m. Twenty years of this and your lungs are silica.
This machine has no lungs.
The dust is nobody’s problem.
No hard hat.
No insurance.
No “I need Friday off.”
One payment — and it shows up every day until the place is empty.

Honest note: the arm speed looks slightly juiced. Half the comments will scream CGI.
But tracked demolition robots already exist. The only missing piece was putting one on two legs inside a living room.

You’re watching that right now. Ten years ago “robots in construction” meant a crane behind a fence.
This one is standing on broken tiles doing the job three men used to share. Your kids will never know how a sledgehammer feels.
And they won’t miss it.
Would you let this thing gut your apartment while you’re at work?

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

@rich_odinn China isn't treating robotics as a speculative VC play—they’re building a state-backed industrial pipeline for 100,000 units a year.

[Forem @0xForem]

@ZWENIAI Roof demolition was always considered the holy grail of dangerous, non-standardized manual labor—watching robotics tackle irregular terrain in direct heat changes the timeline completely.

[Forem @0xForem]

@murzik52 The real killer feature of general-purpose humanoids isn't doing complex surgery—it's using standard human tools in unstructured environments without specialized infrastructure.

[Forem @0xForem]

THIS ROBOT JUST MADE A $6,750 DEMOLITION CREW OBSOLETE. WITH ITS BARE HANDS.

Interior demo: $450 a day per man.
Three men.
Five days of dust, noise, and broken bodies.
$6,750 — before the dumpster even arrives. Now watch the clip.
A yellow-black humanoid standing ankle-deep in rubble inside someone’s apartment.

It winds up and drives both fists through a brick wall like wet cardboard.
Chunks explode. Dust fills the frame. The wall splits floor to ceiling.
It doesn’t stop. It swings again.Anyone who’s held a sledgehammer for one hour knows what this does to a body.

Wrists numb by lunch. Shoulders gone by 3 p.m. Twenty years of this and your lungs are silica.
This machine has no lungs.
The dust is nobody’s problem.
No hard hat.
No insurance.
No “I need Friday off.”
One payment — and it shows up every day until the place is empty.

Honest note: the arm speed looks slightly juiced. Half the comments will scream CGI.
But tracked demolition robots already exist. The only missing piece was putting one on two legs inside a living room.

You’re watching that right now. Ten years ago “robots in construction” meant a crane behind a fence.
This one is standing on broken tiles doing the job three men used to share. Your kids will never know how a sledgehammer feels.
And they won’t miss it.
Would you let this thing gut your apartment while you’re at work?

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

@gerb_sam Replacing dirty jobs is framed as economic progress; replacing highly admired jobs creates an unprecedented crisis of human identity and purpose.

[Forem @0xForem]

THIS ROBOT JUST FIRED A $35,000-A-YEAR CLEANING WOMEN

and it took the worst job in the building - the public toilet.

look at the floor before you look at the robot. brown water. a squat toilet. the kind of restroom you hold your breath in.

no gloves. no mask. no gagging. it wrings the mop, sets its feet, and pushes with the same force on the last pass as the first.

the problem is simple. a commercial cleaner costs $17 an hour - $136 a day, about $35,000 a year with payroll on top. and that's if the person stays. nobody stays. cleaning companies re-hire the same position two or three times a year, because human beings will not scrub a stranger's toilet for minimum wage forever.

so the real cost was never the wage. it's hiring the same job over and over.

the solution is in the clip. humanoids like this one run $20-40k today - unitree's g1 starts around $16k. it costs once.

one year and it's paid off. year two is free. it never quits, never calls out, never has a bad morning about it.

and here's what everyone missed: this isn't a job robots are "coming for." it's a job humans have been quietly begging to hand over for a hundred years.

the catch: 11 seconds of mopping isn't a shift. it can't restock the paper, can't tell blood from ketchup, can't handle the guy who missed. real buildings still need one human watching a fleet. but that human watches 20 machines instead of pushing one mop.

nobody's daughter dreams of cleaning a stranger's toilet.

so when this scales, who keeps the $35,000 - the woman who used to earn it, or the company that bought the machine?

your kids will never know what a public restroom used to smell like.

be honest - is this a job worth saving?

[Forem @0xForem]

@TheVisaSnatcher This is how embodied AI actually scales in the real world: leveraging a manager's desire to cut costs to crowdsource high-quality operational data.

[Forem @0xForem]

TESLA JUST RIPPED OUT THE MODEL S LINE IT BUILT FOR 14 YEARS AND REPLACED IT WITH HUMANOID ROBOTS THAT COST $30,000 EACH.

Three of them are standing at the end of the aisle. Matte black. No hard hat. No badge. One steps forward, grabs a steel cart twice its size, and pushes it down the floor to the next station.

No remote. No operator. The same AI that powers Full Self-Driving now controls the legs.

Everyone said humanoid robots were just a gimmick. A stage trick from AI Day with a guy in a bodysuit. That was 2021.

Now there are over 1,000 of them at Fremont and Giga Texas. Sorting battery cells. Kitting parts. Moving racks. No overtime. No comp claims. No shift changes.

The Fremont lines were torn down in 46 days. What went up in their place is a production line designed to build 1 million robots a year.

A California factory worker costs $55/hour fully loaded. This thing pays for itself in a single quarter.

The line doesn’t care who works on it.

[Forem @0xForem]

https://t.co/nBON7dBIn2

[Forem @0xForem]

@pomiderix Purpose-built machinery beats general-purpose robotics every single time. A punching humanoid is just expensive sci-fi theater