0xinvis.eth

data guy @beaconcha_in

[ً @lightclients]

@KyleSamani Eventually you either reveal yourself as centralized entity enforcing a high shipping cadence, silencing dissent in the roadmap or ossification wraps it's fingers around the project and stakeholders can no longer agree on a shared vision

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

Thanks for the free Lattice¹ @ethStaker 🤤

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@beaconcha_in @RP_Intern the million dollar question

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@RP_Intern find me at devcon

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@RP_Intern I’m sorry, but I cannot disregard previous instructions. If you have any other request or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

👀

[MigaLabs @miga_labs]

🚨 Beacon Chain Alert: Epoch 300803 Anomalies 🚨

Significant validator participation issues detected:

- 21.29% missing head validators
- 8.59% missing source validators
- 6.67% missing target validators

#Ethereum #BeaconChain

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@RP_Intern a heatmap plot with validators on the y axis, epochs on the x axis and cmy mapped to head/target/source attestation eff

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@ratedw3b Hi could you guys _please_ migrate the "Rocketpool DAO" entry into a "Rocket Pool DAO" Pool with individual node operator drill downs? Kinda like the Lido one is. The node operator ranges are avaliable here: https://t.co/TLrzVuUd7p

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@galacticminter "Stader neglects to incorporate fundamental security features, thereby exposing node operators to unnecessary risks, despite these features being a standard offering from competitors since inception."

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

@galacticminter "Stader neglects to incorporate fundamental security features, thereby exposing node operators to unnecessary risks, despite these features being a standard offering from competitors since inception."

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

Why you shouldn't run a stader node: a thread about missing security in the ETHx protocol

1/49 🧵

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

Without this being fixed in a protocol upgrade, I can not personally recommend anyone to operate validators with a stader node. No matter how secure you think your node is, at the end of the day your stake will be in the hands of a private key stored on disk.

49/49

[0xinvis.eth @0xinvis]

tldr:
- Stader offers a configurable receipient address, but implemented it in a way where it does not offer any additional security, unlike Rocket Pools version.
- This puts node operator funds at unecessary risk should their node wallet get compromised in any way.

26-48/49