@Mavro_X He had talent in excess. What he lacked was a ledger. Same Barcelona dressing room, same era, Messi kept his fortune because someone outside the party was counting it.
A Barcelona board member named the one problem that followed Ronaldinho from an estimated $90 million to $6 in the bank.
In 2005 he was the best footballer on Earth. Ballon d'Or. World Cup winner. A face on every billboard.
In 2018, Brazilian prosecutors opened his accounts to collect an unpaid fine. They found 24.63 reais. About $6.
He wasn't broke. He just made the same mistake for 15 years.
At PSG, a teammate said he skipped training all week and showed up Friday to play Saturday.
At Flamengo he was reportedly paid $700,000 a month. He still made them sign a clause letting him go clubbing two nights a week.
Coca-Cola paid him $750,000 a year. He sat at a press conference next to two cans of Pepsi. Deal over.
Every contract went through one man, his brother. The same brother stood next to him in every scandal that followed.
He built an illegal pier on a protected lake and refused to pay the fine. The court took his passport. So in 2020 he entered Paraguay on a fake one and spent his 40th birthday in jail.
Then he rented out his name. A crypto scheme promising 2% a day put him in front of Congress. His own coin lost 80% soon after launch.
A Barcelona director saw it coming years earlier: "Everyone knows we have a discipline problem."
Talent earns the money. Rules keep it. Cash you can reach, debts paid first, more than one person checking your contracts, your name on nothing you can't explain.
Watch the whole fall and ask which of his habits you already have.
@fomoliver Buffett settled this in 1986: leave kids enough to do anything, never enough to do nothing. Chan went to zero and learned the will was never the lever. Showing up was.
@fomoliver Defenders read his feet and still lost. Nobody read his contracts. His brother Roberto Assis ran every deal for two decades, and that single point of failure cost him more than any tackle ever did.
@Beaver_0x This is HTTP ETags from 1997 applied to agents. Check the fingerprint, skip the work if nothing moved. Most of the AI cost problem is people paying a model to notice that nothing happened.
@0x_Luc1us Jackie Coogan made $4 million as a child in the 1920s and got back about $126,000. California passed the Coogan Law in 1939 because of him. It still can't stop a manager who writes the statements.
@Veltrixmoon Mike Tyson earned over $300 million in the ring and filed for bankruptcy in 2003. Talent sets the ceiling on what you earn. Discipline decides what you keep.
@0xForem Same trade early farmers made with the 1917 Fordson tractor. The price of the work stays the same while the cost of doing it collapses. The spread belongs to whoever buys first, until the market catches up.
@Mavro_X Getty installed a payphone for guests at Sutton Place in 1959. Same man, same logic. He wasn't protecting the family, he was refusing to become a price anyone could quote.
@0ddscent Philip Tetlock scored 28,000 expert forecasts over 20 years and most did barely better than chance. The fix was forcing a number you can grade. Track the Brier score or it's just vibes.
@Veltrixmoon Clooney could afford that no because of Casamigos. He and two partners sold it to Diageo in 2017 for up to $1 billion. Owning equity is what buys you the right to turn down a paycheck.
@kryneeex "Not broke, just not liquid" is the most expensive sentence in sports. A 109-room house burning $1M a year is not an asset. It is a liability with a bowling alley.
@barz3n The advisor promising $200M by 23 was the tell. The boring one with savings bonds is why Shaq is still rich, while a 2009 SI report said 60% of NBA players go broke within 5 years of retiring.
@Beaver_0x None of these are BlackRock repos. TradingAgents is Tauric Research and freqtrade has been open source for years. BlackRock's real edge is Aladdin, and it gets licensed, not leaked.
@Veltrixmoon Knowing it is half. LTCM ran around 25x leverage, so even a correct model had no room to be early. The market didn't need to prove them wrong, it only needed to stay irrational for a few weeks.
In 1998 two Nobel Prize winners lost $4.6 billion in under four months. It wasn't bad luck. It wasn't the market. They never drew the one scenario that could kill them.
Long-Term Capital Management. Robert Merton and Myron Scholes on the team. Over 40% a year after fees in its second and third years. Borrowing over 25 dollars for every 1 it had.
Their risk models used about five years of data. As Niall Ferguson put it, the August loss "ought never to have happened in the entire life of the universe." Russia defaulted. Wall Street banks had to put up $3.6 billion to stop the bleeding.
Now meet a mathematician who did the opposite.
Hong Wang. Missed the one math seat her province got at Peking University. This year she won the Fields Medal and $100,000 for a 1917 puzzle that Terence Tao couldn't close.
Her first move was to draw what could break her. She calls it the "enemy example." Then she proved that in 3D it is the only enemy.
Then she split the problem in two. "Then we win either way," she said. A 127-page proof in February 2025.
LTCM had Nobel prizes and 25x leverage. Wang had chalk and one honest drawing.
So what does the only enemy look like?
She draws it in the first 26 minutes of a lecture that sits online for free. Almost nobody gets past minute five.
@0x_Luc1us Commercial fleets live in the 20 to 80% band for exactly this reason. When the last 20% costs as much time as the first 80, stopping early is throughput math, not battery babying.
@0ddscent Exactly. In 1998 LTCM's models treated a Russian default plus a flight to liquidity as near impossible. A probability without a kill condition is just confidence. The kill condition is the actual forecast.
@0xForem Ameca and Sophia already proved the face is the cheap part. The value is in hands and autonomy, which is why Figure raised at a $39B valuation with a robot that has no face at all.
@Beaver_0x The compounding only works if ingest is disciplined. Karpathy's point was curation, not volume. A raw folder full of junk compounds noise just as fast.
@0x_Luc1us Self-representing against Fiona Shackleton was the expensive part. Courts anchor to contribution, not demand, so asking 5x the offer turned a negotiation into a credibility audit. She won money and lost the room.