0xLocker

Building Conviction Lockers (CL-20's). Decentralized price based ERC-20 lockers. Liquidity you control.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

going to make a simple guide. but here's the core idea

Uniswap swap's within the logs onchain can be used to derive:

1. liquidity pool reserves
2. price
3. the current time

the chain is stateless but by making a small buy for a friction of a cent, you can capture this data..

[~ @xbt2027]

we just need to properly explain how CL-20's work and that's basically it, you can even go check it out yourself, @0xlocker shared it

we are near ready

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

@rturn0fthemac sorry just redoing the UX, contracts and docs. almost finished and confident it'll be worth the wait

https://t.co/xSJzYKPAwT

much easier to use than the original D17 sim now

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Pushing back the testnet launch one more time. Looked over with fresh eyes and felt it was a bit too complex.

Simplifying the UI, contracts and doc. Once finished they'll be a final pass on tests and security.

Will update tomorrow but this should be the final version.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Slight change of plan. Same time, 6pm UTC but tomorrow (Monday)

Been in front of the screen a lot and just need to step away and check it over with fresh eyes.

Looking forward to it and will be sharing contracts tomorrow 2pm UTC.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

On track for testnet D17 on Sunday.

The plan is for a sped-up, one day process through 4 phases.

This is optional, it has no affect on the existing airdrop. It's just to test the contracts and process.

Details and timings to follow tomorrow.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

@eth_elian @xbt2027 @a99d2027 @papertrade_xyz sorry just redoing the UX, contracts and docs. almost finished and confident it'll be worth the wait

https://t.co/xSJzYKPAwT

much easier to use than the original D17 sim now

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Pushing back the testnet launch one more time. Looked over with fresh eyes and felt it was a bit too complex.

Simplifying the UI, contracts and doc. Once finished they'll be a final pass on tests and security.

Will update tomorrow but this should be the final version.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Apologies for the additional delay, just want to ensure it's not only secure but easy to use and understand.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Pushing back the testnet launch one more time. Looked over with fresh eyes and felt it was a bit too complex.

Simplifying the UI, contracts and doc. Once finished they'll be a final pass on tests and security.

Will update tomorrow but this should be the final version.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Will update tomorrow after doing a final pass on security. Once it's deployed and verified, we'll help you deploy your own on testnet then get feedback before mainnet.

[~ @xbt2027]

@0xlocker is bringing D17 to life tomorrow, first as a test, and if you like it, on mainnet

we will see it in action together

@a99d2027 has a novel idea that's fitting for a first launch, expect more, SOUL is amazing

the next one would/should focus on @papertrade_xyz, many shared ideas around it

we can collectively utilize it in a mutually beneficial, cooperative way

the fact that @izebel_eth built it generates hype but beyond that, the idea and execution there should get attention regardless, the learning curve is steep but rewarding, execution is easy but rewarding

D17 allocations will resume right after testnet, and all that remains is the process.

Let's win.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

You'll also be able to launch your own D17 on testnet, the more the better.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

The details will drop at 2pm UTC so you'll have time to check the contracts and code. You can join at any stage or sit out.

The goal is to test the autonomous process and get your feedback

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Tomorrow testnet D17 with user controlled lockers is scheduled for 6pm UTC.

They'll be a link for free testnet eth and a local UI to interact. No need to use an existing wallet. It has no effect on D17 mainnet version or your airdrop but will showcase with a sped up version.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

On track for testnet D17 on Sunday.

The plan is for a sped-up, one day process through 4 phases.

This is optional, it has no affect on the existing airdrop. It's just to test the contracts and process.

Details and timings to follow tomorrow.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

@BVishal_chauhan For sure, the plan is to do the testnet dry run this weekend. This is optional, just to test the contracts.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Working with @xbt2027 on the testnet contracts for D17 for a dry run of the user controlled contracts based on the CL20's. This will be on Sepolia testnet.

You'll be able to participate before we get feedback and check for improvements before mainnet.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

@b_coin1 this is unrelated to the existing allocation process,
@xbt2027 will keep you updated. This is just for testing the contracts for D17.

Basically we'll test a draft D17 contract on testnet without real funds, that one won't have the airdrop. Purely for testing.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

We'll share more details shortly.

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

As the existing airdrop process isn't complete. The testnet will be a fresh launch with a simplified contract to showcase and check the process.

There's no need to participate with existing wallets. The local UI will have fresh wallet creation and a link for free testnet eth.

[~ @xbt2027]

where are we at?

D17 quick testnet if you'd like to see it in action

let's stress test it, then move it into mainnet

distribute tokens and move forward

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

no correct answer. just interested to see feedback on whether initial friction for potentially better security makes for better R/R

generally expect it would be:

humans = option 1
agents = option 2

[0xLocker @0xlocker]

Which would you prefer when interacting with new launches/presales?

1. Connecting your wallet to a hosted site, multiple times throughout the process
2. Connecting via a local CLI/UI with public source code