The psychology of AI ownership has shifted from "experimental curiosity" to "digital dominance."
We’re paying a monthly fee to lease a high-performance brain—and it’s changing how we view our own capability.
But there’s a trap: the "I own you" sentiment masks the reality of platform dependence. You might control the prompt, but they control the evolution of the intelligence you rely on.
AI agents can now exploit DeFi vulnerabilities end-to-end.
OpenAI’s new benchmark (EVMbench) shows the top agent successfully executed ~72% of curated high-severity smart contract exploits on a live Ethereum setup.
Paper: https://t.co/TyYs4UffAV
The big question isn’t whether AI can write code. It’s whether intelligence emerges when AI stops relying on human outputs and starts learning directly from reality.
I built Boardroom, a decision governance engine that:
– Models risk-adjusted ROI
– Forces downside exposure
– Makes compliance explicit
– Scores decision quality
– Gates approval based on discipline
Feedback welcome 👇
https://t.co/oExc6xLOBK
OpenClaw agents are powerful. They also expand your attack surface overnight.
If an agent can install packages or read email, you have 2 big risks:
• dependency-based code injection
• prompt injection from “trusted” content
Treat agent permissions like prod infra, not demos.