Park Jin Hyok

Representing the strategic interests of 109 countries.

Offended? Cry me a river while you tell me in what country and what year your grandpa was born.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

No, it's just THE FACT YOUR CAPS LOCK IS ON YOU RETARD.

NO ONE IS PUSHING ANY NARRATIVE. THIS IS SIMPLY TO HELP OUT MUSLIMS WHO ARE VISITING THE MATCH.

YOUR MOUTH AND TONGUE IS VULL OF FENOM CONSIDERING THE SHIT YOU'RE SHOUTING HERE.

PS. JESUS IS A PROPHET, TRINITY IS FAKE.

Caps lock off.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

First of all, Aisha is proven to be in her late teens. 2nd of all, years is not a metric to whether someone is ready for marriage or not. Someone must hit puberty for comsumption, be physically AND mentally grown up, there must be parental consent AND it must be socially acceptable for that time in life.

So under no circumstance does anyone in 2026 meet all these requirements. So it's not allowed.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

Modern scholarly consensus. Also classical Islamic law permitted slavery only through specific wartime circumstances that no longer apply under modern international law. So no matter how many photos you send.. Slavery is not allowed.

Also... are you gonna admit you lied about the year of this photp?

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@Africa_ftbl Can't handle a loss?
The ball was still in

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@Mitz_562 No one gives an absolute fuck about you or your opinion

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@AmoasahPat84067 @GBX_Press Another day another lie
I didn't expect someone from the slums of Ghana to speak the truth anyway.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@vult_dues It's very simple:
1. Aisha was not 9, she was in her late teens. (This can be calculated based on the age of her sister)
2. You're comparing the standards of 1400 years ago to the standards of today. And there are many conditions that MUST be met in order to marry someone.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@Jaypee983726303 @_Ochiedike This is a photo from 2018 taken in Libya. And this is prohibited.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

Calling the Prophet (PBUH) a pedophile is a lazy, out of context, historically dishonest attack that people throw out when they have no real argument left.

First, the age itself is disputed. The "9 years old" figure comes from a single narrator, Hisham ibn Urwa, who reported it late in his life after moving to Iraq, and his own students questioned his memory in that period. When you cross reference with other historical data, like her sister Asma being 10 years older than her, and Asma being around 27 at the time of Hijra, Aisha would have been around 17-19 at the time of consummation, not 9. The chronology doesn't add up, and many scholars including Dr. Mohar Ali have documented this extensively.

Second, even if you take the traditional narration at face value, you'd have to apply that same standard universally. Rebekah in the Bible was given in marriage without her age being mentioned, Mary mother of Jesus is estimated by many Christian and historical sources to have been 12-14. You don't call Christianity a pedophile cult over that, because you understand historical and cultural context when it suits you.

And that's exactly the point. In 7th century Arabia, and across the ancient world, marriage was determined by puberty, parental consent, social norm, and mental readiness, not a modern legal framework that didn't exist until centuries later. Aisha herself was known to be exceptionally mature, sharp, and became one of the greatest scholars in Islamic history.

You're applying 2026 standards to 620 AD selectively. That's not history, that's just motivated reasoning.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

Let's go one by one since you wanna fact-check.

The moon splitting, that's a miracle, not a scientific claim. Every religion has miracles. You believe Jesus walked on water and raised the dead, nobody's calling that debunkable, it's faith.

"The sun sets in muddy water" comes from Surah 18:86, and this is one of the most misunderstood verses in the Quran. It's describing what Dhul-Qarnayn observed from his perspective, not stating a cosmological fact. Even classical Islamic scholars explained this as a visual, narrative description, not a literal claim about the sun's destination. Context matters.

As for babies being formed from the spine, you're referring to Quran 86:6-7, "created from a fluid, ejected, emerging from between the backbone and the ribs." Modern embryology confirms that sperm originates from cells near the embryonic region between where the backbone and ribs develop. The seminal vesicles and testes actually do develop from tissue in that region of the embryo before descending. This was confirmed by embryologist Dr. Keith Moore who specifically studied these verses.

So "debunked in five minutes" is just confidence without research. You picked the three most common surface level objections and none of them actually hold up when you look deeper than a Reddit comment.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@SonOfManXY @Strangeman57 @UgoCannon Lmao, no point in arguing with a gay. Let them be. Mentally ill folks who think a dick inside an ass is natural

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@MasindeThis @_Ochiedike Said the dirt eater from Kenya

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

You're still trying so hard. Alright i'll explain itnto you... Bali is popular for the same reason Phuket is Thailand's top destination, or Cancun dominates Mexico tourism. Beach destinations with resorts always pull the most tourists. Nobody's flying to Bangkok to sit on a beach. That doesn't make Bangkok less of a city or Thailand worse because of it. You're basically arguing that Mexico is a failure because everyone goes to Cancun instead of Mexico City... the logic just doesn't hold.

And since you wanna bring religion into tourism, Istanbul is majority Muslim and pulled 23 million international visitors in 2024, ranking 2nd in the entire world. So what's your point again?

Do I need to continue explaining how tourism works? Since I assume you've never left the country and only done domestic travels. Or at max... visited Mexico

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@3rdeyefry @Coinslinger88 You in fact really have no idea how tourism works, by showing this screenshot

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@ProWestCiv @johnrackham82 While taking the time to reply to everything except the lies I debunked.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

The verses aren't vague. "The heaven We are its expander" doesn't need retrofitting, it says expansion. "The heavens and earth were a joined entity and We separated them" doesn't need squinting, that's the Big Bang. "Between them is a barrier they do not transgress" about two seas, that's a halocline. These aren't poetic metaphors being stretched, they're specific, accurate descriptions.

And if the argument is that they're "vague enough to mean anything," then show me how. Show me how "iron was sent down" can be retrofitted to mean something other than iron coming from outside earth. Show me how the embryonic stages described map to anything other than what embryologists confirmed. The specificity is the whole point.

Vague ancient verses would produce random matches and random misses. What we actually have is consistent accuracy across astronomy, oceanography, geology, embryology and more, all from one book, all confirmed centuries later. At what point does "coincidence" stop being a reasonable explanation?

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@mrsugarjay007 @_Ochiedike I said the Quran... that's not the Quran you dumb yahoo boy

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@OmowayeI58398 @James_et_al @UgoCannon Are you the Yahoo Boy's supervisor?

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@ProWestCiv @johnrackham82 The fact I debunked all your lies and this is the only thing you said. Pretty much shows you have no legs to stand on.
You have no arguments left.

[Park Jin Hyok @109problems]

@Weihnachtskeks2 @McCoyEnt777 @GeorgianaB83826 @ItsZahrah9 The same way they think they MUST support the terrorist entity named isreel because of this verss "Blessed is he who blesses you and cursed is he who curses you."