115IQ

Ti/ger - Tigersexual, rawr~

Meinungsblogger und Jurastudent - Bei Unstimmigkeiten bitte diskutieren statt blocken ✌️💛

❤️ 🧡 💛 💚 💙 💜

Gatze. Gatze toll 😸

[115IQ @115_iq]

Like =/= Zustimmung.

Ich like auch Posts, die mich mindestens zum Schmunzeln bringen, egal welchen Inhalt sie haben.

[115IQ @115_iq]

@GabrielHaze @ModdiWX @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting *level up*

[115IQ @115_iq]

@wowzieez @Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting Missing support, rightfully so

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting Go on then, cut the ties. We wouldn't exactly have the discussion if we stopped after the T, would we?

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting Times change. As far as I'm aware, there was no widespread recognition of the climate change 100 years ago. Now there is. While I deeply hope there won't be recognition for Zoophiles and Maps, the chances of recognition aren't 0 as long as people fight for it

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting (You're tempting me to found one, ngl)

No, because no such group with even a tiny amount of brain matter would do that. You can't just protect such people like that

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting It doesn't. My original argument was: They can be part as per definition.
You, however, turned it to "Prove that even 1 lgbt+ organization includes pedos and zoos".

On a sidenote: I could just found an organization that does, but I don't wanna support such shit

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting And the counter is being countered.

In obvious terms: We can agree to disagree on most things

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting You do realize that being thing a doesnt have to corrupt thing b, do you? Especially when thing a is being hidden? - Me being a musician at night has nothing to do with me being a student at day. I can be part of an english group and secretly have no clue about biology. And so on

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting First of all: You're stupid. Now, with that out of the way: The basis of the community note is unavailable, therefore its validity is subjective at best. And just because something doesn't show doesn't mean it's not part of the whole thing.
-a queer

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting Of course they're not welcome in the LGBTQIA+. Why would they? - Such behavior is sick.

Still, they technically can insert themselves if certain ties aren't cut. And no, they're not the same. LGBT doesn't include anything solely under QIA+

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting https://t.co/Yxt2JRVO7D no longer exists. What does that mean? - Correct: The source of the community note does no longer exist, so for all we know it could've changed. Try again

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting Oddly enough, I'm not losing either

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting So? - As far as I can see it doesn't have any mention of Two-Spirit either, despite Two-Spirit being part of the + (https://t.co/VfLsaYbXs6)

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting You do know we're talking about lgbtqia+ not lgbt, do you? - stopping after the t automatically excludes them. For everything else, the definitions leave room to squeeze them in. Try again.

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting First of all: I had to zoom out, thank you very much. Click on the picture and you gain the ability to take a closer look
Second: For someone who doesn't care you're pretty engaged
Third: I haven't been wronged over 3x, try again
Fourth: I wasn't an ass plus it was suspicious

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting 1. You better know that is impossible for an average user. Neither can I go through an enormous amount of people's private lives, nor do I want to.
2. The added context is based on a site that no longer exists, therefore it's questionable if it even is any evidence

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Gunmetal9813 @Myffinduffin576 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting Oh really? - Prove it

[115IQ @115_iq]

@Myffinduffin576 @Gunmetal9813 @Blckplco14 @DelusionPosting First of all: Fuck you. Glad we exchanged insults, now we can move on.
Second: Read my answer again, you'll find a conditional sentence. You're welcome.
Third: You'll notice I can't see who instantly likes his responses