A family of 5 i personally know need help with basic needs to survive the rest of the week ❤️
If anyone is interested, donate below or dm me for details
The time has come for SprinterPress to retire from Twitter/X. See you in another "story". Best regards to our most loyal and all followers and friends. 💕
☢️ Why is the US running a MOAB PSYOP on Iran? /📄
It's very rare to hear the US media speak about specific munitions. If they ever talk about war, it's usually about delivery systems such as F-22s and B-2 which excite the laymen. Never munitions.
Yet, all over the news, almost in unison, everyone is now talking about MOABs with regard to Iran. Even Trump! In an interview Trump stated, in short that:
1. He may have to use a MOAB.
2. America is strong, doesn't need to use a nuke.
3. MOAB is totally conventional and definite not a nuke.
4. ... It's like a tiny nuke. (his words)
Why is the sitting president of the most powerful country in the world talking about munitions and what brought it up in the first place?
The MOAB is an extremely impractical weapon. It requires a complicated parachute/cradle/separation system that is normally used to deploy armoured vehicles into battlefields, which is why the only aircraft capable of deploying it is the C-130. Flying such a large and slow airplane into Iran is a suicide mission. Doing it to drop the equivalent of 20 Mk84s. It's never going to happen.
Why would they even bother? Three F-15s can carry 21 Mk84s and the area of damage that can be created by those bombs can be far more damaging than the ~10 tons of a MOAB.
It's obviously a cover for a nuclear strike.
The majority of people around the world are barely sentient enough to breathe. Even without Trump prompting them, the moment they see a mushroom cloud and all the signs of a nuclear attack, they fall back to the regular pre-programmed excuses:
1. It's a MOAB (their favorite one).
2. It's an ammo dump (even on open ground or high in the sky)
3. It's thermobaric (they're unaware of how these look like or how small these bombs are despite plenty of footage online)
4. They would tell us if nukes are used, the camera man's eyes would melt like in the movies, and plenty of other ret*rded nonsense.
But let's skip these idiots, nothing will convince them, not even being mortally wounded by a nuclear strike. Let's talk about why Trump is doing this and the consequences, if Iran doesn't chicken out as I sadly expect it to.
The purpose of the coming nuclear strike on Iran isn't to take out Pickaxe mountain but to take out critical infrastructure. To destroy Iran itself. Nothing Trump has done so far has achieved this. Almost all bombed targets were repaired quickly with spare parts. There's a precedent for this: WWII Germany, whose industrial capacity increased despite allied strategic bombing.
Here's how it works: A cruise missile of a 2000 pound bomb can damage certain sensitive sites, destroy civilian cement structures or kill people. But it cannot dent a large industrial facility. You can do the math and calculate the over pressure. Bombs have kill mechanisms that either work by distributing shrapnel or using the blast damage of the high explosive mixture inside. Neither of which are effective against heavy industry.
Not convinced? Remember Azovstal heavy ironworks in Ukraine, Mariupol? Despite weeks of bombardment by Russia, including the deployment of 3 ton bombs (comparable to the MOAB), the facility wasn't even scratched.
In contrast, a carefully calibrated nuclear air burst can flatten whatever infrastructure is below it. There will be nothing left to save or repair. Just debris where a factory or industrial facility was.
This is the only way the Americans now believe they can bring Iran to heel. By doing this attack sequence once (destroying something inside Iran, likely insignificant), showing that:
* Iran is too chicken sh*t to announce it was struck by a nuclear weapon (a catastrophic position to be in if one doesn't have the ability or will to retaliate, just announcing it can cause a state to collapse).
* The world will remain silent as it has with all previous nuclear strikes, especially the most recent one on Syria which has been proven to be nuclear beyond any reasonable doubt (down to radioactive soil samples).
* The American public is so dumbed down that they'll buy the MOAB cover without question.
* The attack can be repeated as many times as necessary to get Iran to surrender.
In short, these nuclear strikes will be demonstration or de-escalation strikes. Meant to stop the war by demonstrating a lack of ability or will on one party's behalf.
If this sounds insane, consider what is at stake. The US's allies in the region have been disrupted to such a degree that there is hardly any oil export coming out of the middle east. The world is living off strategic petroleum reserves which as rapidly being drained. There's no time left. Iran either opens the Hormuz or the world suffers the most catastrophic energy and food crisis in history -- and everyone will blame Israel and the US.
The fall out would be worse than a nuclear war. We are talking mass starvation, and the complete absence of fuel for billions and billions of people. The death toll will be in the same unit as that you expect from a nuclear war: megadeaths. So the closure of the Hormuz has crossed into that threshold.
Can Iran stop this from unfolding? Perhaps. One strategy is to call out the PSYOP -- but I don't expect them to do this. They have carried out clandestine attacks of their own and keeping the public ignorant about limited nuclear warfare is in the interest of every nuclear state including Iran.
An alternative is to preemptively carry out an attack of its own, targeting the very infrastructure required to carry out the nuclear attack. This would not only directly stop the attack, but it will also demonstrate the will necessary to fight the coming nuclear war.
/End
P.S. I fully expect the US to transition to talking up the MOP and B-2 again after enough people realise the MOAB is not deployable over Iran. It's the same BS with another munition.
The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵
What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object?
Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable.
The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11:
The Pentagon.
Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did.
Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage.
So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11!
A. Penetration Depth
================
Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane.
The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings:
The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of:
* 64 meters travelled after impact.
* 130mm of limestone
* 1580mm of bricks
* Six impact impulses
Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg:
- 68 meters travelled
- 138mm of limestone
- 1680mm of bricks
The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason.
B. Pattern of Destruction
================
Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed.
Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind.
C. The Timeline
================
Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it:
8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck.
9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck.
9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck.
9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter.
9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses".
9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised.
10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania.
10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised.
================
This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind.
/1
Israeli Art: The 9/11 World Ending Ritual /🧵
The 9/11 event that struck the amazing city of Manhattan, NYC, changed the world in a very negative way, and is such a deep rooted inception that it has affected your life more than even the COVID-19 event. Yet, so many people are not familiar with the architecture of this terroristic art piece. You see, 9/11 was part terror, part specials and part intrigue, but all these parts came together to form one piece of art for those privy to what was really going on.
In the memories of the majority of people witnessing the horror of 9/11, besides the alleged hijackings and crashes, were two distinct moments:
(A) The people jumping out of the two towers, ending up splattered on the floor.
(B) The moment the two tower inexplicably collapsed and disappeared into dust.
Back in 2001, These moments were surreal. Like a magic trick where someone is sawed in half but gut wrenchingly horrifying because people died in the process.
Much has been argued about these events' physics, such as the real temperature on the floors (and people peering out of the tower seemingly unharmed), or the mechanism of the collapse of the towers. Yet no one considered that these moments, intended to be planted in your mind, were chosen with great artistic deliberation which reveals the true ritualistic intent behind the entire event. Every single detail was taken into account, even the date of the terrorist attack.
Israel Art Students
By now the Israeli involvement in 9/11 is largely accepted by the world. Yet what isn't appreciated by most is the true depth of that involvement.
Between 2000 and 2002, according to Fox News reporter Carl Cameron, the US was inundated with "Israeli art students", often posing as other nationalities*. Most famously, they were given residency in both of the world trade centre towers. One group called E-Team, the other Gelatin, both of which allude to explosives of some sort.
One famous group was attached to a company called Urban Moving Systems, who had a mural of the 9/11 event on their van while it was taking place. After their arrest one of the employees involved in this cut out told the FBI that the Israelis were extremely anti-American and bragged:
"Give us twenty (20) years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your country"
Indeed, in ~20 years time the COVID-19 PSYOP began. Yet, the Urban Moving Systems group are a distraction compared to the other two, lesser known groups.
E-Team was largely secretive but we will see very shortly that their involvement in orchestration of the event was undeniable.
Gelatin, however, were so proud of their involvement that they even published a book about it. We will study this book in this thread as it revealed the methods, the intent and even the artistic techniques used to bring a ritual to change the world for the worse.
It came in the form of two Tarot cards revealed on 9/11:
The Tower
and
The Hanging Man
These cards were not random choices. In demonic divination, the tower tarot card represents a sudden unexpected and dramatic change that destroys shaky foundations.
The hanging man usually represents surrendering to the flow of the world, and gaining a new perspective in it -- an allusion to Odin. Yet when combined with the tower, the individual card represents something else: sacrificing yourself entirely to make a larger later.
The combination of the two cards is the most dramatic and power "one-way" combination in Tarot divination, representing a profound, sudden shattering of old structures followed by an essential period of surrender, and a complete shift in perspective.
Which is precisely what happened on and after 9/11. But there is also a hint, in the meaning of the hanging man -- the hanging man is never truly in danger. Odin allowed himself to be hung upside down in order to gain a new perspective (literally, upside down), only up to the point where he was about to die, but no more. He came out of it unharmed, much as Jesus came out of his crucifixion resurrected from death.
Let's make four important observations, before moving on to the book by Gelatin.
1. The rapidly falling man on 9/11, somehow caught with perfect focus (😂) without his clothes flying everywhere, for some reason, decided to fold his leg in precisely the manner of the Hanging Man Tarot card. Pause for a minute to appreciate how difficult it would be to capture this short with smoke everywhere.
2. The South Tower collapsed just like the Tower Tarot card, which even depicted people falling out, the smoke and so on. It even tilted at the top, like the crown, before disappearing.
3. The two world trade centres were not identical. The north tower had a very large antenna. The south tower did not. After both were brought down, a blue light fixture and a pool replaced them, and then instead of building both back, a single tower which combined the two was constructed. Eventually the two are intertwined by the "One World Trade Centre". Why?
4. The day 9/11 has a special meaning, linked to the construction of the towers themselves. The number 9-1-1 was chosen as the police emergency number on January 1968. And on August 6th the same year, the construction of the WTC1 tower began. Why 9/11? There are two reasons, one historical, another artistic. We'll get into them at the end of the thread.
We will start by deconstructing the first two with the help of Gelatin's book celebrating the "art pieces". The next two observations, will bring it and everything that happened after 9/11, all together.
/1
* In the case of "Gelatin", Austrian.
My friend was martyred on the first day of the first ceasefire because of the government.
he was burried last month and a week after the Lebanese government let the jews into his village.
because of the government his grave is going to be bulldozed in a few Weeks or days.
Hello, an update on the fundraiser:
@mytruth1_0 and i gathered around 8000 on food aid packages to around 250 displaced families.
Ans they've all been given away to families.
Others will be sent to my friend who runs a pharmacy to help people with medicine.
A part for cash handing and special cases like today.
A part for people striving for the country.
We might possibly skip mattresses and blankets, to meet families needs who need food, as the warehouse still has blankets and mattresses. Some might be used on pillows though.
God bless you donors.
World War III: The Fatal Mistake In Iran /🧵
... and why nothing can stop this war except the defeat of the United States.
Introduction: Salami Tactics
Imagine a heavy roll of salami, sitting on a table. It's usually a substantial amount of meat, and not something you can eat in one sitting. In fact, to properly dine on a piece of salami, you should slice it thinly and make a sandwich out of it. Gradually, salami slice after salami slice, the roll will disappear. But at no time except at the end of the roll, do you feel such a substantial amount of meat will run out.
This is the classic "salami tactic" concept, and the same idea applies to every aspect of life and war. Let us start with something that should be immediately familiar to any professional.
Office bullying can be modelled through salami slicing. Imagine a slight against you — very small, not enough to make you retaliate. Everyone prefers a comfortable peace, after all. You might even rationalise it as a mistake. But then it happens again and again, with each move it perhaps slices deeper into your personal space or rights.
But with each slice, your standing is lowered to the point where you're faced with the same dilemma: It's cheaper to let it slide and hope it doesn't happen again. Before you know it, you've been completely undermined and removed from the picture with miserable prospects for the future.
This is the most basic form of what is usually termed coercive gradualism, or gradualist tactics supporting a grand strategy. In RAND parlance, "threshold stretching and exploitation". In fact, this is exactly what started this war with Iran which is bound to expand as all means by which it can end have already been destroyed.
This isn't the first time this has happened, in fact, another war was started by the exact same mistake. Let us discuss that first before moving on to the current war that is raging and expanding horizontally (geographically) and vertically (in terms of escalation).
Which war am I talking about exactly? You see, that war was World War II.
The US didn't kill Khamanei in a hiding place.
It killed him inside his own home, he didn't even bother relocating somewhere safe. He must have decided his death was necessary to justify the holy war that has just begun which will likely kill millions if not billions.
Relativistic Soliton Mechanics
By Korobochka 31.12.2025
The derivation of the Schrödinger equation, the Planck relation, ... with quantum mechanics emerging in the form of the unique low-energy limit of nonlinear electromagnetism under Lorentz invariance.
https://t.co/QjoHDn6BhH