Midge

tired.

[Midge @12009877T]

“…the machine becomes curator…of news, fashion, critical theories…aiming at control … the goal is for information trends to go beyond any [human] organized control…to live in empiricism because it’s good for you. …like the parent saying ‘because’”

[Midge @12009877T]

“…human physiology, or rather, human existence, is entirely dependent upon the electromagnetic signatures of earth itself…going beyond its influence theoretically results in a burst of complex cancerous growth as the body’s morphology attempts to find a stasis…”

[Midge @12009877T]

"...yes, I see. I guess you could look at it like DNS, but the domain-names here are less definitive than some static URL. All information is integrated into the coordination network relative to all other information, both local and global. A mesh-net's DHT might be better here."

[Midge @12009877T]

"...population centers reaching a certain threshold are provisioned with a knowledge server. This then integrates first with local information under the precept that knowledge is at first a local phenomenon which may only be—but not necessarily—locally relevant."

[Midge @12009877T]

@yacineMTB https://t.co/9oRZ3xNS7x

[Midge @12009877T]

"...if you've got some kind of Soviet or Cybersyn model in mind, you're misunderstanding. The all-knowing computers exist to maximize social agency, to enable a maximally fluid society while simultaneously facilitating its ongoing function by moving humans and allocating robots."

[Midge @12009877T]

"...right, but the point is that the all-knowing computers provide us with a perfect coordination market. If we find that so-many people in some area have the desire for some activity that exceeds the local supply, the computers will simply shuffle the humans around accordingly."

[Midge @12009877T]

"...mark my words, many of us will be following the schedules set forth by the all-knowing computers and will be happier for it. I should mention that we would choose where it is we'd like to be (as far as we can), more or less, but the computers will allocate accordingly."

[Midge @12009877T]

did asimov consider coexistence of multiple rulesets with different priorities? what if each ruleset is less of a ten commandments kinda deal and more of a buncha RLHF kinda deal?

[Midge @12009877T]

the fail-up decade

[Midge @12009877T]

@eugenekudashev aka "dev/engineering experience" too often the exception

[eugene, season 2 (work in progress) @eugenekudashev]

software as an art form

[Midge @12009877T]

expert systems fan boi here

[Midge @12009877T]

@algekalipso feel like you bias choice by listing these values in such an order

[Midge @12009877T]

@joodaloop in that case, "active participant"

[Midge @12009877T]

@joodaloop is neutral the same as passive?

[Midge @12009877T]

@twitter please open links in non-embedded browser. i want to retain my web history so i can search for links I've visited.

[Midge @12009877T]

AGI is only possible in a world where we (en masse) convince ourselves that a machine (or something like it) is making sense and begin acting on its prescriptions

[Midge @12009877T]

@mpershan An abstract intellectual game

[Midge @12009877T]

who already made the observation that it should have been open-source data over open-source software (mostly)?