An aesthetic & philosophic channel, so it also focuses on criticizing ugly things.
I strongly reject Islam & any other similar cultis. If u mind, block me plz.
Most Chinese pple genuinely respect, admire, and feel grateful to Mao.
If you've never been to China, or if you've read too much western tabloid ciwshit, you definitely won't believe or understand this.
In China, the term "fighting race" refers specifically to Russians.
It doesn't mean Rus are good at fighting, but that they tend to solve problems with violence.
When violence brings greater gains, they use it.
When not using violence would bring greater gains, they still might
Anyone who boasts abt enemy casualties is always the losing side cuz they have no real spoils to show off.
War is simple: just look at how the front line moves on map.
U can't claim victory while losing land, or claim killed tons of enemies while capturing no pow —and
I came across a piece written from the British perspective about how The Gloucestershire Regiment was wiped out by Chinese forces in Korea. The article is drenched in sentimentality, portraying the Gloucestershire Regiment as extraordinarily brave—but it gets several facts wrong.
The Gloucestershire Regiment had roughly 750 men. With attached artillery, tanks, and other support, the total force engaged was about 1,000. The attacking force was not "27,000 men from the 63rd Army" as the article claims, but rather the 187th Division of the 63rd Army—about 9,000 men in total. Of those, the unit actually assaulting the British was the 560th Regiment, roughly 3,000 men. The other two regiments of the 187th Division, the 559th and 561st, were tasked with blocking enemy relief forces. So the real force ratio was about 3 to 1.
The fighting lasted roughly 30 hours, not the 3 days the article claims. In the end, after 129 British soldiers were killed, 459 surrendered, and a small remnant fled. The 560th Regiment suffered 176 casualties.
After the battle, the Chinese gave the British a balanced assessment: they regarded the Gloucestershire Regiment as a British "elite" unit with fine equipment and a glorious history, but concluded that its fighting will and combat effectiveness were both poor. That conclusion is well founded—the numbers speak for themselves. After just 30 hours of fighting, with only a quarter of their men killed, the remaining two-thirds gave up and surrendered. What more is there to say?
I came across a piece written from the British perspective about how The Gloucestershire Regiment was wiped out by Chinese forces in Korea. The article is drenched in sentimentality, portraying the Gloucestershire Regiment as extraordinarily brave—but it gets several facts wrong.
The Gloucestershire Regiment had roughly 750 men. With attached artillery, tanks, and other support, the total force engaged was about 1,000. The attacking force was not "27,000 men from the 63rd Army" as the article claims, but rather the 187th Division of the 63rd Army—about 9,000 men in total. Of those, the unit actually assaulting the British was the 560th Regiment, roughly 3,000 men. The other two regiments of the 187th Division, the 559th and 561st, were tasked with blocking enemy relief forces. So the real force ratio was about 3 to 1.
The fighting lasted roughly 30 hours, not the 3 days the article claims. In the end, after 129 British soldiers were killed, 459 surrendered, and a small remnant fled. The 560th Regiment suffered 176 casualties.
After the battle, the Chinese gave the British a balanced assessment: they regarded the Gloucestershire Regiment as a British "elite" unit with fine equipment and a glorious history, but concluded that its fighting will and combat effectiveness were both poor. That conclusion is well founded—the numbers speak for themselves. After just 30 hours of fighting, with only a quarter of their men killed, the remaining two-thirds gave up and surrendered. What more is there to say?
It was at the same time as the destruction of the British Gloucestershire Regiment that the "Battle of Yultong," as Filipinos often call it, took place.
In the Philippines, Yultong Battle has been portrayed as a legendary "against-all-odds victory," but in mainstream international military history and Chinese records, it was merely a battalion-sized encounter whose outcome was vastly different from Filipino propaganda.
In the Filipino narrative, it is claimed that the Philippine force consisted about 900 men, most of whom were logistics personnel. It is claimed that they blocked 40,000 Chinese People's Volunteers. It is claimed that they killed 7,500 Volunteers, while only 24 of their own men were killed.
According to Chinese, American, and other national military records, the Philippines did indeed send the 10th Battalion Combat Team. At the time of the battle, the battalion had about 900 men and was stationed on Hill 152.
On the night of April 22, 1951, during the Fifth Offensive of the Chinese People's Volunteers, the Chinese launched a surprise attack on the U.S. 65th Infantry Regiment and its attached Turkish Brigade, Puerto Rican battalion, and Philippine battalion. Two companies of the 132nd Regiment, 44th Division, 15th Army of the Chinese forces—roughly 300 to 400 men—attacked the Philippine battalion defending Hill 152. In this battle, 335 Philippine troops were killed or wounded, including 3 captured, and the Chinese forces took Hill 152. Chinese casualties numbered only a few dozen, most of them caused by American aircraft bombing during the assault on Hill 152. Philippine resistance was in fact very light.
From the Chinese perspective, this battle was an ordinary one. Not many people remember it. Chinese people don't even know that it's a Filipino. But the Philippines had just gained independence at that time, and they urgently needed to forge a sense of national identity and military honor, so political figures such as Ramos exploited and repeatedly exaggerated this experience to promote national self-esteem and win elections. That's why "Yultong Battle" becomes increasingly famous in Phi.
The article is drenched in sentimentality, portraying the Gloucestershire Regiment as extraordinarily brave from British perspective—but it gets several facts wrong.
The Gloucestershire Regiment had roughly 750 men. With attached artillery, tanks, and other support, the total force engaged was about 1,000. The attacking force was not "27,000 men from the 63rd Army" as the article claims, but rather the 187th Division of the 63rd Army—about 9,000 men in total. Of those, the unit actually assaulting the British was the 560th Regiment, roughly 3,000 men. The other two regiments of the 187th Division, the 559th and 561st, were tasked with blocking enemy relief forces. So the real force ratio was about 3 to 1.
The fighting lasted roughly 30 hours, not the 3 days the article claims. In the end, after 129 British soldiers were killed, 459 surrendered, and a small remnant fled. The 560th Regiment suffered 176 casualties.
After the battle, the Chinese gave the British a balanced assessment: they regarded the Gloucestershire Regiment as a British "elite" unit with fine equipment and a glorious history, but concluded that its fighting will and combat effectiveness were both poor. That conclusion is well founded—the numbers speak for themselves. After just 30 hours of fighting, with only a quarter of their men killed, the remaining two-thirds gave up and surrendered. What more is there to say?
Song empire was highly developed in both econ& tech. But bcoz kept suppressing military power, it was not a strong nation, nor was it feared by any countries.
In fact, its history was one of constant compromise with foreign powers, being intimidated & extorted by its neighbors.