Lise Rosablanche

@17Rosablanche

📅 🇨🇭 🌲 🫐 🌼

Joined November 2022

541 Following

291 Followers

11.2K Posts

17Rosablanche retweeted

Mikki Willis Official

@MikkiWillis

4 days ago

Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along! Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.” They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying. I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself. What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude. Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.” To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few: THE OTHER GUNMAN An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case. He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up. DISPATCH AUDIO 911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.” DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.” DNA DISCREPANCIES Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle. INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment. THE UNFIRED BULLET During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was. ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom. As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims. Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.” As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture. Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones. And… exhale. These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk. What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions. Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice. This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Mikki Willis Investigative Filmmaker

$MikkiWillis's tweet photo. Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along! Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.” They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying. I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself. What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude. Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.” To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few: THE OTHER GUNMAN An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case. He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up. DISPATCH AUDIO 911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.” DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.” DNA DISCREPANCIES Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle. INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment. THE UNFIRED BULLET During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was. ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom. As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims. Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.” As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture. Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones. And… exhale. These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk. What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions. Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice. This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Mikki Willis Investigative Filmmaker$

448

242K

Lise Rosablanche @17Rosablanche

4 days ago

@Alexis_Cossette

Dr. David Martin

@DrDMartinWorld

4 days ago

Just under one month away... make sure you're joining either in person or online...https://t.co/uhxRt6r2qR

Lise Rosablanche @17Rosablanche

5 days ago

@LudoNicolas17 Ah non, si ça t'amuse, alors tu n'as aucune raison de t'en priver! 👍 L'avantage quand on leur répond, c'est qu'ils nous offrent une occasion d'exposer nos arguments - pas pour eux (c'est peine perdue), mais pour d'autres personnes qui liraient le fil

Lise Rosablanche @17Rosablanche

5 days ago

@LudoNicolas17 guet-apens (pas un mot qu'on écrit tous les jours - j'ai dû rechercher comment ça s'écrit! 😉) https://t.co/voOyXJyw2y

Who to follow

Péonia

@Galadriell__

Esprit libre & stubborn heart • “Tout le monde savait que c'était impossible. Il est venu un imbécile qui ne le savait pas et qui l'a fait.”

Trading09

@trading6661

"Une blessure c'est une épreuve, mais comme toutes les épreuves l'essentiel c'est de les dominer "

🍓Sined Warrior🐭🍓

@SinedWarrior

Euskal herria - baiona

17Rosablanche retweeted

Ludovic♦️Nicolas

@LudoNicolas17

5 days ago

L'election de 2020 fut bel et bien un getapan pour piéger l'État profond transnational. La vérité est sur le point d'être révélée ! 👉Ils ont volé l’élection de 2020 juste sous vos yeux, et ils vous ont ensuite menti en pleine face. Ils font du gaslighting aux citoyens américains depuis des années. Si vous êtes impliqué dans une fraude électorale, vous feriez mieux de vous trouver un avocat, parce que votre temps se fait computer.

Lise Rosablanche @17Rosablanche

5 days ago

@MartinZ_uncut SafeBlood est une association qui s'est formée pour répondre à ce problème https://t.co/zPZbZOpn5Z @Safe_Blood3 https://t.co/dY4KlRxnea

904

Lise Rosablanche @17Rosablanche

10 days ago

@ameledebey Merci à Pascal Egli de témoigner 🙏💛 Merci à L'Impertinent de lui donner la parole 🙏💛

17Rosablanche retweeted

Amèle Debey

@ameledebey

11 days ago

« Sûr et efficace. » Berset, von der Leyen, Biden, Merkel – tous, mot pour mot. 💬 Pascal Egli, vice-champion du monde de course en montagne : carrière pro terminée après sa 3e dose. « Avant : 20 heures d'endurance. Après : 30 minutes de marche. » ⛰️👇 https://t.co/VNkDAPAEQM

207

130

17Rosablanche retweeted

@mgoeas29

13 days ago

Today I’m flying to Japan in the hopes of getting some of my life back. I haven’t stepped on a plane in over 4 years — not since I became sick with myocarditis following the COVID vaccination and my life changed overnight. I’m praying I make it there safely with no episodes along the way. For the next 4 weeks, I’ll be undergoing the McCairn Edogawa Protocol in Japan in the hope that it can help me reclaim some of the life I’ve lost. We’ll see how it goes. 🙏🏽✝️❤️‍🩹🇯🇵

mgoeas29's tweet photo. Today I’m flying to Japan in the hopes of getting some of my life back.

I haven’t stepped on a plane in over 4 years — not since I became sick with myocarditis following the COVID vaccination and my life changed overnight.

I’m praying I make it there safely with no episodes along the way.

For the next 4 weeks, I’ll be undergoing the McCairn Edogawa Protocol in Japan in the hope that it can help me reclaim some of the life I’ve lost.

We’ll see how it goes. 🙏🏽✝️❤️‍🩹🇯🇵

929

808

211

79K

Lise Rosablanche @17Rosablanche

12 days ago

@adnm_live Nième psyop, Nième coup de théâtre, et en plus ils nous racontent ce qu'ils veulent: qui pourrait confirmer de manière fiable ce qui se passe sur le terrain? Je me contente de regarder de loin Et quelle est la prochaine péripétie? La sortie de Trump?👇 https://t.co/cqPfTI7mcS

Disclose.tv

@disclosetv

12 days ago

NOW - Trump says Iran may kill him: "I may be gone too, because I'm their number one target."

266

452

465

496K

651

17Rosablanche retweeted

Laurent Mucchielli @LMucchielli

13 days ago

‼ Nous venons de publier cet article important : Ph. Brouqui, L. Mucchielli, (2026), « Conflits d’intérêts et construction de la notion de "désinformation en santé" : le cas du rapport Molimard », Hegel, 162 (2), p. 255-266. https://t.co/kBZi5K7kdf (demande de PDF par mail)

207

118

12K

17Rosablanche retweeted

RexesRule ⚓USN ⚓😺 🦝

@CatsRule2023

13 days ago

Important findings from Dr. Kevin McCairn's clinical research project in Japan. Please repost. 🙏 #McCairn Edogawa Protocol "The figure shows SARS CoV 2 Ig Total measured by MAGPIX before treatment and after completion of our 4 week DFPA + SGF protocol (n = 38). Circulating anti Spike antibodies reduced across the gaze (Wilcoxon signed rank, P < 0.001)." https://t.co/xXGeRY5DXN

17Rosablanche retweeted

Xavier Poussard

@XavierPoussard

17 days ago

Cette séquence s'explique par le fait que le réalisateur du documentaire de BFMTV s'était fait mener par le bout du nez par les Macron lors d'un précédent documentaire en 2019. Quant à Sylvie Bommel, la biographe officielle de Brigitte Macron, elle a été prise pour une imbécile une première fois en 2016 (« Et Brigitte créa Macron »), puis une deuxième fois en 2019 (« Il venait d'avoir 17 ans »). Cette sortie n'est qu'un des signes avant-coureurs de l'ouverture de la boîte de Pandore. Leur chute sera terrible. Et ils le savent.