love77t

Not for you buddy
XAB

[love77t @17_abuzar]

I love you in a way, I wished some would love me.

[love77t @17_abuzar]

Ever illusion become reality
When she smiled.

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@HimalayanRoars No

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@Extreo_ 🤑🤑🤑

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@JagranNews .

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec how jesus was portrayed in Gospel of thomas is completely different from Quran, The nature of kid and how the Kid acts is completely different, so there isn't even similarities

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec Now to your last argument that quran copied from Gospel of thomas, So first of all there are many points that are to be said for this, the most basic one is similarity doesn't mean Same origin this is straight up fallacious reasoning, Secondly they aren’t even similar,

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec 7th century knows aramaic and greek, but this is straight up false and unsound, if your argument is abductive even then it is false because the Data points towards completely different hypothesis, based upon islamic traditions and even western academia

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec so this is invalid argument even in its logical form let alone the Soundness of it, Because the conclusion that he knows greek and aramaic doesn't follow from The premise that he was an trader, for this to argue you have to add extra premise that every trader in

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec Here he explicitly understood it as God's commands, His decree and laws not written manuscripts so again your point is quite weak Now to even worse claim which is that Prophet Mohammed saw knows, aramaic and Greek because he was trader,

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec Data points towards completely different hypothesis, based upon islamic traditions and even western academia

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec The premise that he was an trader, for this to argue you have to add extra premise that every trader in 7th century knows aramaic and greek, but this is straight up false and unsound, if your argument is abductive even then it is false because the

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec Now to even worse claim which is that Prophet Mohammed saw knows, aramaic and Greek because he was trader, so this is invalid argument even in its logical form let alone the Soundness of it, Because the conclusion that he knows greek and aramaic doesn't follow from

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec not the you can't change the word in any written manuscripts and this is how scholors and muffasirins have understood

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec So when Quran says that Word of god can’t be corrupted it doesn’t mean that you can take a copy of quran and change the word in it, it means the what Allah swt have decreed it can’t be change, it

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec The people who believed in him Are those who are to be asked

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec

[love77t @17_abuzar]

@BrewingAle @Islamic_reflec