Je parle souvent des cyniques et des believers.
Les believers croient à ce qu'ils disent. Les cyniques disent ce qui marche.
On m'a souvent décrit Jean-Luc Mélenchon comme un cynique à 150 %. Un homme qui a changé d'avis sur à peu près tout au fil des décennies, et qui possède un talent rare : comprendre les masses mieux qu'elles ne se comprennent elles-mêmes.
Je n'en avais jamais vu une démonstration aussi propre qu'aujourd'hui.
Teddy Riner se déclare candidat. Réaction d'une partie de la galaxie insoumise : on attaque. On tape, on dénigre, on cherche la faille, on en fait un ennemi. Le réflexe pavlovien du militant.
Et Mélenchon, lui, fait exactement l'inverse.
« Il est de droite, moi de gauche. Mais il a de la gueule. »
Pas d'attaque. Pas de procès. Un compliment.
Pourquoi ? Parce qu'il a fait le calcul que ses troupes n'ont pas fait.
Avant même l'officialisation de sa candidature, 22 % des sympathisants LFI se disaient prêts à envisager un vote Riner. C'est son meilleur score, tous électorats confondus. Riner ne prend pas des voix à la droite. Il en prend à Mélenchon.
Attaquer frontalement un quintuple champion olympique que les Français adorent, c'est un net négatif garanti. Tu passes pour le méchant, tu le victimises, et tu pousses tes propres électeurs dans ses bras.
Alors Mélenchon ne l'attaque pas. Il le range.
« Il est de droite. » Quatre mots. Pas une insulte, une étiquette. Riner se dit ni de droite ni de gauche, et Mélenchon lui colle la seule chose qui compte pour son électorat : il n'est pas des nôtres.
Résultat : tous ceux qui pensaient voter Riner pour un symbole, une figure à laquelle ils s'identifient, plus que pour un programme qu'ils n'ont pas lu, viennent de recevoir le message. Gentiment. Sans brutalité. Un désaccord démocratique, respectueux, presque élégant. Et les voix rentrent à la maison.
Il ne combat pas Riner. Il l'empêche de lui voler des voix.
Le tout emballé dans la posture du vieux sage de gauche, au-dessus de la mêlée, qui préfère « battre une droite qui a de la gueule ». Le cynique se déguise en homme de principes. C'est tout l'art.
Je dois le saluer. Je respecte toujours l'intelligence, même chez ceux que je combats. Surtout chez eux.
Jean-Luc Mélenchon est quelqu'un d'absolument brillant. Et c'est le plus grand manipulateur de France.
Ses lieutenants ont foncé dans le mur. Lui a marqué ippon.
Chapeau l'artiste. Joseph Mélenchon Staline est très fort.
I think we're entering a civilizational rupture that nobody can predict. Not me, not the labs, not governments.
I don't know how much people realize how fast we're moving.
Look at what Anthropic's new model did during testing.
It solved two open problems in theoretical physics, both on black holes. One of the calculations was laid out in 2003 and nobody had ever finished it, because it was too laborious.
It formalized the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 30 hours, with a thousand agents that organized themselves. The first attempt took 11 days.
It wrote an operating system that boots on a laptop, starting from an empty folder, in 8 days.
It designed three electronic devices, boards, enclosures and software included. All three worked without a single electrical modification.
It found a new method to predict the structure of viral capsids, the shells used to deliver gene therapies.
And on robot control, it more than doubled the previous version's score.
All of that in a single announcement, on a Monday.
I think discoveries are going to stack up so fast that they'll produce an abundance we've never known: energy, health, materials, food. And with it a phase of immense joy, the joy of a civilization realizing that scarcity was never a law of nature.
Except that joy is going to land in a world order that's cracking everywhere, and that was designed by Malthusians. People convinced that resources are finite, that there are too many of us, and that the job of an enlightened elite is to manage scarcity on everyone else's behalf.
To me, Bill Gates is the most famous face of that worldview: a man nobody elected, who has weighed on the planet's health, agriculture and climate policies for twenty years. The degrowth crowd is the militant version. They don't even want to manage scarcity anymore, they want to organize it.
Abundance is the worst possible news for that worldview. If energy becomes nearly free and diseases fall one after another, nobody needs anyone to ration anything for them.
So I don't think they'll fight it. I think they'll try to capture it.
In the name of safety, climate or public health, we'll be told this power is too dangerous to be left in everyone's hands. We already saw the movie during Covid: the permission slips, the passes, the QR code to go get a coffee. Now imagine the same logic with an AI that can see everything, trace everything and decide everything in real time. Orwell never imagined a tool like that.
The technology is winning on its own. The question of the next ten years is who abundance will belong to.
We are living through the greatest civilizational revolution in human history. It's happening right now, and most people are looking the other way.
Ukraine is essentially a giant CIA base, posing as a sovereign nation.
The CIA moved into Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union, looking to take advantage of the lawless and destabilized country, using it as an offshore proxy, outside the scope of US oversight.
It began with the Nunn-Lugar Act in 1991, and then carried on into 2005, when then Senators Obama and Lugar visited Ukraine, to inspect the former Soviet bio, chemical, and nuclear facilities (pictured below), and then added Ukraine to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and began turning these former Soviet facilities into “defensive research facilities”, which opened the door for US contractors to establish their foothold in Ukraine, and set up their money laundering and racketeering operations, under the guise of “foreign aid”.
Then the CIA funded Nazi militant groups in Ukraine which led to the outbreak of civil war in 2014 in the Donbas. Amidst the chaos, the US State Department, via Victoria Nuland, leveraged the situation to install US-loyal puppets, including the infamous leaked phone call between her and fellow State Department bureaucrat Geoffrey Pyatt, about ensuring “their guy” Yatsenuik, was installed as Prime Minister. The State Department, in tandem with the CIA, covertly took control of Ukraine via Color Revolution in 2014.
Putin recognized this. He knew that the US had destabilized and taken control of Ukraine, and recognized that the US were building a proxy army on his border, by funding, training, and supplying Ukraine with weapons, and trying to bring them into NATO. This was a red line for Putin, as he has said for decades. Russia have been invaded from the West too many times before, and will not tolerate a hostile standing army and long-range missiles on their border. Just like the US didn’t like it when Russia tried to put nukes in Cuba in the 60’s, Russia doesn’t like the US trying to bring armies and weapons to Ukraine.
Essentially, Ukraine is an unofficial US territory and NATO member, and the Deep State do not want to lose out on their cash cow and strategic asset that is Ukraine, hence why they continue to send hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to protect Ukraine’s border. They are using Ukraine as a laundry mat to funnel in hundreds of billions for the war machine, and also covering up their extreme criminality in Ukraine, including crimes against humanity for bioweapon development, human trafficking, drug trafficking, etc. All the things they can’t get away with stateside, they do in Ukraine.
If the public knew the truth about the origins of US involvement in Ukraine, they would NEVER have supported sending a single penny to Ukraine. The narrative that Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022 “unprovoked”, is war propaganda to make it appear Ukraine are the righteous defenders in order to garner your support, when in reality, The US started this conflict, they are the ones who brought war to Putin’s doorstep, and the US are the ones perpetuating the war by continuing to fund and supply Ukraine.
Putin does not want to conquer all of Europe, he just wants NATO off of his border, and justice for US development of weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine, namely, gene-specific biological weapons.
The Cold War never truly ended.
Jean Cocteau a initié sexuellement et plongé dans l'addiction à l'opium un collégien de 15 ans, publié un éloge vibrant du sculpteur officiel d'Adolf Hitler sous l'Occupation, et usé de ses relations pour faire échapper son amant collaborateur à la justice à la Libération.
Il reste pourtant célébré dans l'histoire culturelle française comme le prince des poètes, l'académicien enchanteur de La Belle et la Bête et l'incarnation de la grâce artistique du XXe siècle.
Dans l'imaginaire collectif, l'écrivain et cinéaste demeure un génie fantasque et lumineux, figure de la liberté créatrice et de l'avant-garde parisienne.
La réalité, documentée par sa correspondance, son journal de guerre et la biographie de Claude Arnaud publiée chez Gallimard en 2003, révèle un artiste beaucoup moins irréprochable, marqué par ses relations troublantes, ses addictions et ses compromissions politiques.
En mai 1919, Cocteau, âgé de 29 ans, rencontre Raymond Radiguet, un adolescent de 15 ans qui vient de quitter l'école.
Une relation intense se noue entre les 2 hommes. Cocteau devient son mentor et son compagnon de vie. Leur proximité alimente les soupçons d'une liaison sexuelle, sans qu'elle soit formellement établie.
Leur vie commune est marquée par les excès nocturnes et l'alcool. Radiguet meurt le 12 décembre 1923, à 20 ans, d'une fièvre typhoïde.
Pour surmonter ce deuil, Cocteau sombre dans l'opium dès janvier 1924 et partage cette drogue avec le jeune Maurice Sachs, rencontré à 17 ans, puis avec Jean Desbordes, 19 ans, qui devient son compagnon et partage sa dépendance dans les fumeries de Toulon.
Sous l'Occupation à Paris, entre 1940 et 1944, loin de toute résistance active, le poète fréquente les salons de l'ambassadeur allemand Otto Abetz et l'officier Ernst Jünger.
Le 23 mai 1942, en pleine déportation des Juifs de France, Cocteau publie à la une de Comœdia son texte Salut à Breker, un hommage dithyrambique à Arno Breker, le sculpteur favori d'Adolf Hitler qui expose alors au musée de l'Orangerie.
Cocteau choisit ainsi publiquement de célébrer l'un des artistes majeurs du régime nazi. En retour, Breker lui apporte une protection personnelle auprès des autorités allemandes.
Pendant ce temps, son ancien compagnon Jean Desbordes, engagé dans le réseau de résistance F2, est arrêté en juillet 1944 par la Gestapo française de la rue de la Pompe.
Il meurt sous la torture le 9 juillet 1944. Sa sœur aurait demandé à Cocteau d'intervenir pour le sauver. Si ses démarches réelles restent discutées, la mort de son grand amour demeure un épisode sombre de son histoire.
À la Libération, en août 1944, Cocteau doit répondre de son hommage à Breker et de ses fréquentations allemandes devant les comités d'épuration.
Mais il bénéficie du soutien de figures majeures de la Résistance intellectuelle, comme Louis Aragon, Elsa Triolet et Paul Éluard, dont les interventions permettent son acquittement.
L'artiste que la France honore comme un magicien candide a ainsi partagé l'opium avec de très jeunes compagnons, célébré le sculpteur préféré d'Hitler sous l'Occupation et bénéficié à la Libération de la protection d'écrivains résistants.
Derrière le magicien des mots se dessine le portrait beaucoup moins lumineux d'un artiste dont le génie n'a jamais garanti la probité morale.
Julius Caesar ruled Rome openly for about five years and was murdered for it.
His grand-nephew ruled for forty-four and died in his bed. The difference was a lesson.
By early 44 BC, Caesar was dictator for life. He sat on a gilded chair, wore the purple, and had his image set among the statues of the kings.
At the Lupercalia that February, Mark Antony offered him a diadem in public. Caesar pushed it away, but the damage was done.
By the Ides of March, more than sixty senators were in on the plot, and Caesar took 23 wounds.
Octavian was eighteen, studying in Greece when the news arrived. He drew a conclusion that would shape the next four centuries.
Romans hated the word rex, but they were far less bothered by what a king actually did. After Actium in 31 BC left him without a rival, he spent years building a system around that principle.
In January 27 BC, he staged a famous scene. He announced that he was handing the state back to the Senate and people.
The Senate, according to Cassius Dio, begged him to keep ruling, and he agreed to take the provinces where most of the army was stationed. They gave him a new name, Augustus, and a modest title, 'Princeps', first citizen.
His own account of his reign claims that afterward he surpassed everyone in auctoritas, prestige, but held no more formal power than his colleagues in any office.
That sentence was carefully built, but the power was real. In 23 BC, he gave up the consulship he had held year after year and took two powers that required no office.
The first was superior imperium, giving his authority precedence over other governors in the provinces. The second was tribunician power, with its veto and personal inviolability, without requiring him to hold the office of tribune.
One secured his command. The other embedded him in Roman politics. Neither sounded like a crown.
Everything else carried on. The Senate survived, trimmed from around a thousand members to six hundred. Consuls were still chosen, praetors still presided over the courts, and young nobles still climbed the ladder of offices.
Augustus cut the army from perhaps 60 legions to about 28 and settled the discharged veterans on land.
His own Res Gestae says he paid for it personally, to the tune of hundreds of millions of sesterces.
A state that looked like the Republic ran on his money and his soldiers. When people tried to give him more, he refused, and that was part of the performance.
Suetonius says that in 22 BC, a crowd demanded he be made dictator, and he dropped to his knees and bared his chest, begging them not to.
It would be too simple to call it a swindle. Romans had lived through roughly eighteen years of civil war since Caesar crossed the Rubicon.
Tacitus, no friend of the regime, admits that people accepted the new arrangement because it brought peace, and that the old order had stopped working.
The facade held because it was partly true, and because Romans remembered what the alternative looked like.
It also lasted. For about three centuries, emperors called themselves princeps and treated the Senate with outward respect. Open talk of a lord and master didn’t arrive until Diocletian.
The consulship Augustus had preserved survived the fall of the western empire and was abolished by Justinian in 541.
Caesar wore the crown and died for it.
Augustus refused it and founded a dynasty.
I talk to people in Brussels, they're scared to death. Why? You got AFD in Germany, then you got Marine Le Pen in France. These are the two biggest economies. Both of them are against the EU. Both are against war.
This is why, all of a sudden, you see the EU trying to get the UK back in, Canada in. They know that the French elections are in April. If you're going to see any escalation into geopolitical stuff, it's going to start in January.
Recently I told you there are two kinds of people in this system: cynics and believers.
Ursula von der Leyen, I put her with the believers. And that's exactly why you need to understand how the machine works.
Because cynics are very rare. Soros, I put him in that category: he knows exactly what he's doing, and he has never hidden it.
He read Popper, he has a theory of change, and he understood early on something the right still hasn't figured out: you don't change a society by winning an election. You change it by funding, for thirty years, the people who will write the reports, train the lawyers, and advise whoever wins the elections.
$24 billion spent by Open Society since its creation. More than 50,000 grants. In 2015, he wrote in plain text that the EU must accept at least a million asylum seekers a year, and mobilize NGOs, churches and businesses to take them in.
All of it is public. That's the most impressive part.
Here's how the system got hacked, in three steps.
Step one: selection.
Nobody recruits idiots. No need. The money does the selecting on its own.
A grant never goes to the person who doubts. It goes to the person who already believes. Repeat that over thirty years and tens of thousands of grants, and you get an entire ecosystem where the free thinker was filtered out at the door. He wasn't fired. He just never got funded.
What's left: people who are sincere, credentialed, conformist, and whose paycheck depends on the cause.
Step two: funding manufactures conviction.
Try explaining something to someone whose paycheck depends on not getting it.
The NGO produces a report. The report gets cited by an expert. The expert testifies before the Commission. The Commission turns it into a directive. And the NGO guy ends up in a cabinet, then goes back to a foundation.
Everyone knows each other, cites each other, funds each other. It's an echo chamber with a budget.
Step three: emotion.
You never debate results. You debate intentions.
One photo beats a thousand statistics. Every objection backed by numbers becomes a moral failing. And when reality contradicts the narrative, the dissonance always gets resolved the same way:
"It's a necessary evil."
"It's collateral damage."
"The real problem is elsewhere."
Immigration is never a problem. The problem is your perception.
The result: the system doesn't produce corrupt people. It produces NPCs. People reciting a script while convinced they wrote it themselves.
Ursula doesn't need to be bought. She has spent her entire career in an environment where every expert, every report, every "civil society" group tells her the same thing. She is convinced she's on the side of good. And that's what makes her immune to facts.
And the best part of the story: Soros isn't even the system's biggest funder anymore.
You are.
Between 2021 and 2023, €7.4 billion in EU funds went to more than 12,000 NGOs. The European Court of Auditors itself says it can't get a reliable picture of who gets what.
The hack worked so well that the machine now runs on your taxes.
This is not a conspiracy. A conspiracy hides. Here, the amounts are public, the op-eds are public, the recipients are public.
It's an incentive system. And you don't fight an incentive system by insulting the believers. You fight it by cutting off the tap and demanding total transparency: who funds whom, to say what.
As long as it stays opaque, they'll keep shipping believers at scale.
🚨🚨NETANYAHU'S POLICE INTERROGATION TAPES JUST LEAKED AND THEY REVEAL HE PERSONALLY FUNDED HAMAS. THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING.🚨🚨
1,000 hours of secret police interrogation footage of Benjamin Netanyahu.
Now public. Banned in Israel. Going viral globally.
Here's what's on those tapes:
💀 Netanyahu personally arranged for Hamas to receive $35,000,000 EVERY MONTH from Qatar
💀 This was done IN SUITCASES OF CASH — because even banks refused to cooperate
💀 He personally begged Qatar, a country with no ties to Israel, to give money to his "enemy"
💀 He was doing this while ACTIVELY under corruption investigation
💀 His own words: "under the request of Benjamin Netanyahu personally"
💀 Total transferred to Hamas with his blessing: OVER $1,000,000,000
Let that sink in.
The same man who stood up after October 7 and declared "Hamas is a monster, we will annihilate them" was the one keeping Hamas alive with suitcases of Qatari cash.
⚠️ His strategy, from his own transcript: keep Hamas in Gaza, keep Fatah in the West Bank, PREVENT them from uniting — so there would NEVER be a Palestinian state
⚠️ Without a Palestinian state, Netanyahu stays in power — no peace deal means endless war means he stays "Mr. Security"
⚠️ He needed Hamas to survive so he could keep winning elections by being the only man who could "handle" them
Now watch what this means:
→ Netanyahu funds Hamas for years → Hamas grows stronger → October 7 happens → Netanyahu declares war → 46,000+ Palestinians die → War delays his criminal trial → He seeks a pardon
→ The monster he fed attacked his own people
→ And he's using that attack to escape justice
The corruption trial? 3 charges. Bribery. Fraud. Breach of trust.
His court just REJECTED his request to delay hearings — TWICE in one day.
The ICC issued an arrest warrant for him for war crimes in Gaza.
His own aide was arrested for taking Qatari money.
And now his police interrogation tapes show he was the one sending Qatari money to Hamas.
The same Qatar he "hates." The same Hamas he "fights."
⚠️ He publicly called Hamas the enemy
⚠️ He privately funded them for years
⚠️ His bombing of Gaza kills tens of thousands
⚠️ His war delays his own criminal conviction
This isn't a war on terror.
This is a man running out the clock on his own criminal case using 46,000 Palestinian lives as cover.
And the world is just starting to understand it.
MICROSOFT PATENTS AI THAT DECIDES WHAT YOU'RE ALLOWED TO SAY & CENSORS WORDS IT DEEMS ‘OFFENSIVE’
Patent describes rewriting speech LIVE ON CAMERA & REDRAWING YOUR MOUTH to make censorship INVISIBLE
AI could CHANGE YOUR WORDS based on WHO you are & what IT THINKS you SHOULD SAY
@planetoftechs Je ne pige pas, ce mois-ci Arianespace doit lancer Ariane 6, lanceur de 5 tonnes selon les configurations prévues à cet effet. Pourquoi ce besoin de passer par SpaceX, sont-ils pressés par le temps ?