A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐

Truth is my God.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@FiLiA_charity @GadSaad @MacyGraysLife @MattWalshBlog What makes you think men get less backlash on this topic? Is there any good evidence to tell either way?

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@ColonelCulpepp2 @tales_tomorrow The conditions & judgment made by the judges were incongruous. It's like saying, "You can't interact with these people without a lawyer present. But you may go to event X. You were at event X. But so were the people you're not to interact with. But your lawyer was present. Jail".

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@ColonelCulpepp2 @tales_tomorrow The initial judge gave her permission to be at the event though. The other judge should've had the sense to let it slide since it was incongruous to let her go yet keep her jailed for interacting with people at the same event. How do we even know they weren't discussing the case?

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@tales_tomorrow @IronRick6 It was a noise issue, not a violence issue. They even stopped the honking after a court injunction. Think of it this way: When there's a loud concert late at night in a suburban area with tons of cars parked on streets, it would be absurd to call it violence (not the definition).

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@tales_tomorrow @IronRick6 Violence means use of force, not parking truck or use of truck horn.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@ColonelCulpepp2 @tales_tomorrow The second judge even ignored the stipulation that she could have contact with those people in the presence of her legal counsel - and her lawyers were present.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat �� @1984Brotherhood]

@ColonelCulpepp2 @tales_tomorrow The second judge should have overlooked that, because you can't give someone explicit permission to go to an event but also forbid contact with someone who might be at said event.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@feezandfriends @BigBEEwithItch @realmonsanto Do you have evidence that the protesters in Ottawa and on the Ambassador bridge were armed and intended to violently oust the government? Because such an extreme claim requires that kind of evidence.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@tales_tomorrow It wasn't a violent protest, ergo it was a peaceful protest.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@DreamingInCode @scottjshapiro Cool pronouns, bruh. As if we didn't know your sex.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@KnowNothingTV He's making sense. There are no Ls there. Why is Twitter censoring opinions?

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@stephknee I always bring him so I know who the Woke religious people are right out of the gate. Smoke the weasels out of their holes.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@Maro_Virino @KatieBabieTX @logosaetos @Smatterchuboy @latimes Do you believe that courts should be able to order a man to pay child support and alimony to a woman? Or is what he chooses to do with his body in those circumstances overriden by other reasons? Curious to know.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@CuriousnTT @Evolving_Moloch The standard position in evolutionary psychology is that the adaptations they're most interested in can be affected by recent evolution in a quantitative sense but not a qualitative one. In any case, all empirical questions.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@Evolving_Moloch @CuriousnTT I would interpret her and people like her as referring to the underlying adaptations. The question of what their plasticity is like is an interesting one, but it also should be possible to separate these questions too.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@JohnFMiller86 For example, a parent might want the offspring to be more risk-averse than the offspring wants. There are subtle Darwinian forces lurking in the background.

[A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 @1984Brotherhood]

@JohnFMiller86 One minor quibble: The interests of parent & offspring don't overlap 100%, because their genomes don't, and because parents typically want to protect their parenting investments. So it shouldn't be assumed that every value a parent tries to impart is in the interests of the child