My favorite crypto conspiracy right now is that Do Kwon taking a plea deal is somehow attached to the recent @ALT5_Sigma filing mentioning $UST
Would it be so far fetched to see @EricTrump or @ZachWitkoff pick up the ashes of the Terra community to boost USD1 stablecoin users?
OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME. FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA. LIKEWISE, WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!). WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
🇺🇸BREAKING: TRUMP MEDIA GOES ALL-IN ON BITCOIN | $2.5B TREASURY DEAL
Trump Media just dropped a $2.5B crypto play, raising funds to build one of the largest Bitcoin treasuries ever by a public company.
The pitch? Hedge against fiat risk. Sidestep banks.
Align with Trump’s "America First" crypto push.
Backers include ~50 institutional investors.
This follows Trump’s executive order creating a U.S. Bitcoin reserve; a full pivot from calling crypto “thin air” in 2019 to now pushing BTC as national strategy.
Markets liked it: Bitcoin jumped 1.5% on the news.
Source: TMTG, Reuters
Media: Cointelegraph
The Terra Classic community has launched its own memecoin platform. LUNCPumpFun is now live... You can create memecoin tokens via LUNCPumpFun. Active use of the platform can have a positive impact on $LUNC and $USTC.
In an environment where the memecoin craze has reached its lowest points; it is important for the Terra Classic blockchain to launch its own memecoin platform. We have seen examples of this in important blockchains such as TRON, Solana, BNBChain. LUNCPumpFun can bring more movement to the Terra Classic chain.
Let's say that memecoin investments are very risky. I recommend that you do not invest significant amounts in tokens that have been issued "for fun". Volatility can be very high. Losses can be serious. Be careful.
#TerraClassic #LUNC #USTC #LUNCpump
$MSTR has acquired 22,048 BTC for ~$1.92 billion at ~$86,969 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 11.0% YTD 2025. As of 3/30/2025, @Strategy holds 528,185 $BTC acquired for ~$35.63 billion at ~$67,458 per bitcoin. $STRK $STRF https://t.co/1sfyBIglnt
@Binance listed 4 meme coins, but should they relist #USTC / #LUNC on BinanceUS?
Terra Classic is building relentlessly, it has a dedicated community! @cz_binance what do you think?
Drop a like if you think Binance should cast a vote regarding relistings on BinanceUS🙏
Dear #LUNCcommunity,
a message from your friendly #lowleveldev Strath.
It really seems that many don't understand the implications of their behavior and the consequences for chain security.
I did not bring this up before end of the SubDao vote as I, contrary to obviously common habits, don't like to use dirty tricks and fear-mongering to sway votes.
The SubDao approach would have offered a promising way to provide the chain with something it is lacking badly: *governance-approved points of contact*.
These are *especially* relevant for chain security. And I'll explain why.
#TerraClassic relies on upstream code like wasm, Cosmos SDK, CometBft and others. Those code releases can contain security issues.
The normal procedure for (especially high-severity) fixes is to notify chain points of contact *before* making the issue and patch public.
This is to prevent making potentially bad actors aware of the issue and give chains the opportunity to upgrade early.
Fact is: We as a chain do NOT receive these notifications anymore. Why? Because of the public bickering and discrediting, and the missing (approved) point of contact.
So what does that mean? People (voluntarily) need to actively track all upstream repositories for security advisories (which normally anyway are only published *after* private disclosure).
So to give you a more concrete example: I stumbled upon a message from Antier Solutions in a casual group about their SDK upgrade proposal few days ago (they posted it earlier already). They hinted to a Security Advisory with "critical" severity which had already been publicly disclosed in February. After assessing the impact, Frag decided to implement the fix on chain. During the work we realized that other upstream code also released high-severity patches, already publicly announced since a while and had gone unnoticed.
A dedicated *governance-approved* security group would have provided a transparent and efficient point of contact and a way to efficiently coordinate with devs (and validators if necessary) on these matters.
The same applies to the other fields that the DAOs were meant to handle communication in. But that's a different story.
People do not understand that there is no "make everything public" in security. Not even in a decentralized environment.
Demanding this and blocking efforts to streamline this part of the chain is *actively and intentionally* putting the chain at risk. And this is absolutely no exaggeration.
After all, we all are lucky that this chain did not run into unplanned chain halts or more severe problems due to security issues that could not be fixed as quickly as it was the case a longer while ago.
Meanwhile, some are trying their best to discredit all those who step in voluntarily in these situations, and that have done more for the chain than they would and could ever do … of course again and again with false claims, half-truths and populism. Bravo.
Think about this when supporting and cheering those playing "guardians of decentralization". Those using fear-mongering, false claims, deflection and threats. Well, good luck to us all with that mindset.
Cheers.
P.S.: Thank you, @frag_dude for stepping in. Once again. Although parts of this community absolutely do not deserve it. And according to their talks, don't need it.
#blamefrag (and maybe myself) for going outside of governance to apply various important security patches to the chain and coordinate the upgrade procedure through a governance proposal.
#LUNC #chainsecurity