Repeal the 19th'ers are not at all shocked.
If any of our mothers kill us, or any of the rest of your mothers kill you, I want them given a rocking chair on a porch and a blanket and infinite cigarettes, and peace and quiet.
But at no point in time should women be wielding political power. They cannot police themselves you should not be surprised when their policing in general is revealed to be totally asymmetrical incoherence.
Our grandfathers would have scoffed at the 70s marital reforms. And their grandfathers would have scoffed at the 1920 amendment.
I don't know how you frame this has ethics without the context of gender Dynamics.
It's been a hundred years of power transfer from men to women.
If my own mother killed me, I would absolutely not want her imprisoned or killed. I'd want her to be given a blanket a porch or rocking chair and infinite cigarettes.
But at no point in time should she have ever been wielding political power.
If my mom ever kills me, for any reason, I want her to be given a blanket, a rocking chair on a porch, and infinity cigarettes to live out her days with as little hassle as possible.
However, at no point in time should she or any other women have been given the "right" to direct politics (basically violence), aka vote.
Tantrum, yes. Incoherent and drunk.
Dad wants to start a neighborhood gym for boys only? Moms will make sure their daughters get a portion. Doesn't matter to them how it affects the boys.
A mom opens a girls-only ballet place? No problem.
Grown women asserts to a group of men that female students should be taught by mainly women teachers? They respond with consideration.
A man asserts to a group of women that boys should be taught mainly by men?
An explosion of contempt.
Their demands are asymmetrical. Total lack of awareness. Drunken children
@R_H_Ebright@wesyang Until a father can create a boxing gym with his son's overall constitutional health in mind without local moms demanding half the places open time belongs to their daughters, and then having that assertion imposed with help from the state, absolutely nothing is being extirpated
@Uglypumpkins1@memeticsisyphus Family will be going onto the grill top one piece at a time and I will rule this gay affluent blue neighborhood like a Haitian warlord
@CovfefeAnon The repeal the 19th'ers are not shocked about any of this. Not in the slightest.
The Lindsey case, in terms of the overall reaction of women at large,is a yuge 'i told you so' for (us)
@xwanyex Noah is the boomer who's son got jumped multiple times by black dudes but still nods along as the black Boomer at his country club lectures him about racism.
Would you say that it benefits the state to mandate an age minimum requirement for a person to be considered capable of understanding the full breath of the consequences of these permanently life-altering interventions?
Or would it be a case-by-case basis, giving doctors quite a profound level of personal authority?
@memeticsisyphus Indian plumbing & waste removal infrastructure is at about 35%. Any so called cream of the crop can get shipped right thfk back until they impose hierarchical standards on themselves to the same extent European men have done to each other.
Right. And everything in the west is the symmetric inversion of that.
Wives call all the shots, and if a husband asserts himself against her will she will have him removed, take half his money, and then go f*** someone else. All with the states help.
Hundreds of moms bragging about the discipline they impose over their sons on Facebook. Not a single mom bragging about the discipline she's imposed over her daughter..
So it is what it is.
The central error is that when men speak as leaders, they are addressing other men but when women speak, they are also attempting to address men, rather than women.
It's a hubristic losing sight of their natural purview, which is contemptible because their natural preview - the direction of young women - is one they ignore out of lack of self-control over their appetite for wrangling the boys.