🚨🚨El PRIMER protocolo del mundo revisado por pares que utiliza antiparasitarios como ivermectina, mebendazol y fenbendazol para el cáncer ha sido publicado...
Esto podría cambiar el futuro de la oncología para siempre..
Estos medicamentos desempeñan un papel fundamental en el tratamiento del cáncer...
Miles de pacientes con cáncer ya han utilizado alta dosis de #ivermectina, #mebendazol y #fenbendazol con resultados notables...
La teoría de la conexión mitocondrial-célula madre (CMCM) sugiere que el cáncer se origina por una insuficiencia crónica de fosforilación oxidativa (OxPhos) en las células madre. Esta insuficiencia de OxPhos conduce a la formación de células madre cancerosas (CSC) y a un metabolismo energético anormal, lo que finalmente resulta en malignidad. Este concepto integra dos teorías consolidadas: la teoría de las células madre cancerosas y la teoría metabólica. Basándose en conocimientos de biología molecular, farmacología y estudios clínicos, este manuscrito presenta un protocolo ortomolecular híbrido dirigido a la CMCM. El protocolo incluye siete recomendaciones terapéuticas, que consisten en ortomoleculas, fármacos y terapias adicionales. El objetivo de este protocolo ortomolecular híbrido es lograr efectos aditivos y sinérgicos para potenciar la OxPhos, inhibir los principales combustibles de las células cancerosas (glucosa y glutamina), y dirigirse a las CSC y la metástasis. Por lo tanto, numerosos experimentos sugieren que dirigirse a la CMCM podría ser un posible enfoque terapéutico para el tratamiento del cáncer...
🚨PROTOCOLO ORTOMOLECULAR HÍBRIDO PROPUESTO
1. Ivermectina
* Cánceres de bajo grado: Dosis de 0.5 mg/kg, 3 veces por semana (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
* Cánceres de grado intermedio: Dosis de 1 mg/kg, 3 veces por semana (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
* Cánceres de alto grado: Dosis de 1 mg/kg/día (de Castro, et al., 2020) hasta 2 mg/kg/día (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
Todas estas dosis se han establecido como tolerables para humanos (Guzzo, et al., 2002).
2. Vitamina C Intravenosa
* Cánceres de grado intermedio y alto: Dosis de 1.5 g/kg/día, 2-3 veces por semana (Fan, et al., 2023). Establecida como una dosis no tóxica para pacientes con cáncer (Wang, F., et al., 2019).
3. Vitamina D Oral
* Todos los grados de cáncer: Dosis de 50,000 UI/día para pacientes con un nivel en sangre ≤ 30 ng/mL; 25,000 UI/día para niveles entre 30-60 ng/mL; y 5000 UI/día para niveles de 60-80 ng/mL.
Se ha establecido que esta es una dosis no tóxica (Cannon, et al., 2016; Ghanaati, et al., 2020; McCullough, et al., 2019).
* Es necesario alcanzar un nivel en sangre de 80 ng/mL de vitamina D (25-hidroxivitamina D (25(OH) D)) (Kennel, et al., 2010; Mohr, et al., 2014; Mohr, et al., 2015).
Este nivel no es tóxico (Holick, et al., 2011). Una vez alcanzado, debe mantenerse con una dosis diaria reducida de 2000 UI/día (Ekwaru, et al., 2014).
La concentración de vitamina D en sangre debe medirse cada dos semanas para dosis altas y mensualmente para dosis más bajas.
Consulta siempre con tu médico...
https://t.co/rYPaZusuJ4
@voicesunheard My friend lost her baby still in utero after a “routine” flu shot. Meanwhile, I had a family doc who knew I was “crunchy” so I never even knew they were giving them during pregnancy.
"I believe that we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history.
We have a product being injected into children 70+ times over the course of their development that’s never been tested against a proper saline placebo.
Over the course of that time period (1970 – 2025), chronic illness in this country has gone from 10% of children having one or more chronic conditions to now more than 50% of children having one or more chronic conditions.
Secretary Kennedy in the hearing that was last week said — the latest data from the CDC says that 76% of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions.
And I believe that lots of these chronic conditions stem from iatrogenic injury.
We have 3 million children with autism. Back in 1970 the rate was so low that it was essentially zero.
I’m outraged by that and I think every person in this room should be outraged by that.
I don’t know how to say it anymore clearly that we need to change course in this country.
And I’m terribly disappointed by the medical profession. In the social sciences, there’s this term called epistemic capture, which is when the entire knowledge production process becomes captured by one industry (Big Pharma). And that’s what’s happened with science and medicine.
And so I think we need to change course. And I think the people who have covered up the autism epidemic and the epidemics of iatrogenic injury should be held to account for their actions."
@teacher_choice@charliekirk11@andrewcuomo There was a tie. Freedom lovers won in NY. Instead of playing fair and calling the win, IN FULL VIEW blatant whispers of pressure altered the course of NY history with one changed vote. Someone should investigate.
@SEDillingham@InformedNJNurse@charliekirk11 We can’t do anything that will give injection authority to the feds, yet, we are not slaves subject to the whim of our masters in the states who blatantly disrespect our rights to bodily autonomy. States are taking authority they do not have either and should also go pound sand.
🚨BREAKING: FDA Goes Rogue — Approves Moderna’s Next-Gen COVID-19 mRNA Injection Without Placebo-Controlled Trial
This move directly contradicts a recent HHS statement:
“All new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure — a radical departure from past practices.”
Moderna’s new shot: mNEXSPIKE (mRNA-1283) — a next-generation COVID-19 mRNA injection targeting the spike protein’s RBD and NTD regions, rather than the full-length spike.
🔻 Approved for adults 65+, and for ages 12–64 with any CDC-defined “underlying condition”
🔻 No placebo group in pivotal trial—only compared to Moderna’s earlier deadly shot
🔻 Placebo-controlled trial won’t begin until Nov 2025 (results due 2027)
This authorization appears to align with their so-called “evidence-based approach to COVID-19 vaccination” published in NEJM—a policy that permits the continuation of mass experimentation on many Americans without clinical proof of benefit.
In a burst of energy before she died, my mom urged us to take her to where she'd be buried.
Cupping my dad's face, she talked about how magical their life was together.
It was the most profound moment of my life, and it wouldn't have happened if we listened to her doctors.
Just 13 days before, in January 2021, my mom was apparently healthy.
She felt a pain in her stomach during her morning hike and got a scan. Stage 4 pancreatic cancer.
She called me and said she wouldn’t meet her future grandchildren. The family rushed to her side. My sister @DrCaseysKitchen and I learned three things over those next 13 days... Lessons that we think provide an explanation - and solutions - for the largest issue our country faces: the fact that we are getting sicker, fatter, more depressed, and more infertile at an increasing rate while bankrupting our country with healthcare costs.
The first was that the predominant incentive in medicine is to intervene after you get sick.
Right after my mom's unexpected cancer diagnosis, a medical team out of Stanford and Palo Alto Medical Foundation jumped to action, recommending a laundry list of surgeries and procedures—biopsies, blood transfusions, and a liver stent. In most cases, the patient would have agreed to these procedures, and the meeting would wrap up quickly.
These recommendations were coming from some of the most prestigious institutions in the world, after all.
But based on my sister's experience in medicine (Stanford MD and surgical residency), she started asking questions. We learned that these procedures had about a 33 percent chance of extending her life a few more months at most, a 33 percent chance of shortening her life span, and a 33 percent chance of not impacting her life span (yet keeping her away from the family). In all cases, the invasive route would mean that my mom would need to sit in a hospital room alone, because of Covid-19 protocols, and potentially longer if the surgery had complications, as they often do with immunocompromised cancer patients.
My mom made it clear to the oncologist that she was not afraid of her rapidly impending death, but she wanted to minimize unnecessary pain or nausea in her final days. Despite being clear, the system pushed the exact procedures that would yield pain and nausea and aggressively shamed our family for questioning the full-court press approach.
Thank God we had my sister - who had routinely seen doctors push unnecessary surgeries to terminally ill patients during her training - who had the wherewithal to push back.
In 99.9% of cases, my mom would have died alone in a hospital room and we would have missed the life-changing final days with her.
The second lesson was that my mom's cancer was not "random." Her oncologists said it was "bad luck." It wasn't.
In the decades leading up to my mom’s cancer diagnosis, she was informed her rising cholesterol, waistline, fasting glucose, and blood pressure levels were conditions that she could “manage” for life with a pill. But instead of isolated conditions, all of the symptoms my mom experienced leading to her death were warning signs of the same thing: dysregulation in how her cells were producing and using energy.
But through decades of symptoms, my mom—and most other adults in the modern world—are simply prescribed pills and not set on a path of curiosity about how these conditions are connected and how the root cause can be reversed.
The third lesson was that there is a better way than our current system, and it starts with understanding that the biggest lie in health care is that the root cause of why we’re getting sicker, heavier, more depressed, and more infertile is complicated.
Depression, anxiety, acne, infertility, insomnia, heart disease, erectile dysfunction, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer’s dementia, cancer, and most other conditions that torture and shorten our lives are actually rooted in the same thing.
And the ability to prevent and reverse these conditions—and feel incredible today—is under your control and simpler than you think.
After leaving traditional medicine and working with patients to understand their biomarkers and take simple root causes actions - my sister routinely saw quick reversals of formerly intractable conditions.
The siloing and medicalization of chronic disease in the past fifty years has been an abject failure. Today, we’ve siloed diseases and have a treatment for everything:
✅High cholesterol? See a cardiologist for a statin.
✅High fasting glucose? See an endocrinologist for metformin.
✅Depressed? See a psychiatrist for a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).
✅Can’t sleep? See a sleep specialist for Ambien.
✅PCOS? See an ob-gyn for clomiphene.
✅Erectile dysfunction? See a urologist for Viagra.
✅Sinus infections? See an ENT for an antibiotic or surgery.
But what nobody talks about—what I think many doctors don’t even realize—is that the rates of most of these conditions are going up at the exact time we are spending trillions of dollars to “treat them.”
In the face of these unprecedented trends happening to our brains and bodies across our life span—which all have metabolic dysfunction as a root—we are told to “trust the science.” This obviously doesn’t make sense. We have been gaslighted to not ask questions over the past fifty years at the exact time chronic disease rates have exploded.
The truth: we should consider listening to the medical system if we have an acute issue like a life-threatening infection or broken bone. But when it comes to the chronic conditions that plague our lives, we should distrust almost every institution giving the advice. The answers are much more simple and under our control.
___
In the days following my mom's death, my sister and I affirmed to devote our lives to changing these broken health incentives. And Casey expressed a passion to write a book with lessons she's learned working inside and outside the medical system. I have helped her write this book over the past several years and it will be coming out in May.
A lot of issues will be discussed as we enter 2024, but the most important is that our human capital in America (particularly kids) is being decimated by preventable and reversible metabolic conditions. Thank you @bariweiss@TheFP for publishing an excerpt.
Over 20 years ago, Children’s Health Defense CEO @maryhollandnyc witnessed her son regress into autism after receiving the MMR vaccination. Since then, she has been on a mission to tell the truth to everyone.
For Mary, like for all MAHA moms, her desire to put an end to the chronic childhood disease epidemic is personal.
“When you hit upon the truth and you know it's so important to children and to other people, you just, you can't walk away from it.”
You get a blood test at your annual physical.
The doctor says, "we see evidence of cancer floating in your blood."
You're ordered to get Larry Ellison's patented AI gene therapy that costs $500,000 per dose.
You get four treatments and the last dose kills you.
The doctor shrugs and says, "we did everything we could."
All wealth is now drained from your family.
You never had cancer in the first place.
Larry has liability protection because he called his injections a "vaccine".
This is quite possibly the biggest grift in history.
"The Stargate Project" is Operation Warp Speed 2.0 on steroids.