He really picked the wrong migrant.
Called him a brainwashed racist, then asked where he lives.
His response:
“Your head.”
Lies back down. Finishes his fag.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck the fastest car does not equal dominant. in none of the years you mentioned did lewis have a dominant car. source: results and statistics. i wont be replying any more since clearly you have no leg to stand on and are just spewing nonsense and using ai to get your point across
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck mclaren had a far superior lineup to ferrari and still only accumulated 14 more points across the season. as i said, ai will bend reality to say what the user wants it to say. try forming your own arguments. you are either ragebaiting to a different degree or heavily retarded
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck "your" logic is just ai, which tends to hallucinate half the things it says in order to satisfy the user. i did also disprove the ais claims earlier on when you used the screenshot however you conveniently ignored that. lmk if you have any evidence that i havent disproven yet
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck you claimed 07, 17, 18, and 21 were dominant cars, i disproved that all here https://t.co/Htyaag8hfP,
just because a team wins the constructors championship does not mean they had the best car all year, let alone at a single specific race. i fail to see how "a rookie" winning
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck 2007 mclaren (wouldve) scored 218 points, ferrari scored 204, while having much better drivers. at best the mclaren was equal with ferrari, lewis and fernando are just far better drivers than raikkonen and massa. and anyway, overall wcc standings do not matter considering that
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck bro, you are living in your own fantasy. are you gonna state any facts as to how his cars were dominant, or just repeat the same claim without any evidence that i have numerous times debunked??
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck as i have said before, the red parts are the bits that are too long to send in one message. if you wanna keep going back and forth then im happy to but you still havent said anything that disproves any of my claims
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck youve immediately lost the argument by using ai, however the ai itself does also admit that there was "intense competition". as i said, the facts show they were not dominant, seeing that they only scored 14 more points than a much inferior ferrari lineup. im happy to continue
Singapore tight street track + Hamilton awareness + Santi and Ferrari pitwall incompetence...
We are deadass getting hit with a 20 place grid penalty this weekend.
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck my "odd, red comments" are just the parts that are too long to go in one message because i dont pay for that premium twitter shit. would you like to tell me some reasoning for how the mclaren was dominant, or are you just going to ignore my and spew about how it was dominant
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck 2007 mclaren (wouldve) scored 218 points, ferrari scored 204, while having much better drivers. at best the mclaren was equal with ferrari, lewis and fernando are just far better drivers than raikkonen and massa. and anyway, overall wcc standings do not matter considering that
@sehoff44@ContadorSchleck 2007 the mclaren was around equal with ferrari. 2017 the merc was probably the best car but no where near dominant, the races mentioned here are china (bottas finished p6, 48 secs behind lewis) and singapore (mercs qualified p5-6, car was comfortably 3rd best that race).
Anyone who knows F1 history knows he didn't lose anything. It was given up on his behalf by Ron Dennis t satisfy his secret agreement with Max Mosley.
Had Lewis won this title, Max would have sunk McLaren, maybe even for good.
Ron couldn't let that happen.