@MattBarnett2477@EWHK70 Yes, it's a rule breach and City literally accepted the procedural non-cooperation fines. You may call it obstruction but City considered it a tactical jurisdictional protest. They consider the panel a compromised fishing expedition.
@Virtus_Strength@JayLskkwid@EWHK70 ok Etihad is taking PL to the court and what if it is proved that PL got their facts wrong about all the arrangements with City. Who is coming to save them the rival fans?
@atulkasbekar and Bittu, If you thought your status in the movie and glamour industry shields you from being called out for your clueless takes, then better go manage your talent agency and count your flops because you are acting entirely out of your depth here. Save your fading relevancy too.
@atulkasbekar Imagine having around 800k followers and a blue check, but your ego is so incredibly fragile that a tweet from an account with 3 followers(which I just got yday) makes you have a complete psychological meltdown.
Thanks for proving my point, Bittu. You are completely, rattled.
@JayLskkwid@Virtus_Strength@EWHK70 Yeah, called the 24 witnesses liars and the evidence fabricated because they based their opinion on the hacked emails. They had 0 witnesses of their own btw
@JayLskkwid@Virtus_Strength@EWHK70 The PL panel called the sponsorship contracts a 'sham' without verifying the cash path with the sender. Under UK commercial law, you can't publicly trash a third party's business integrity and damage their upcoming global IPO with zero due process.
@Virtus_Strength@EWHK70 I don't think anything is established based on the facts but hard copies of the hacked emails. While there is other proof that where the money came from and the fact that it was told to US DoT in 2015 and to CAS in 2020.