startrash

[startrash @1startrash4]

@CFCJahhhh @clears_spoon @000brim @crackcobain__ Denying objective history just makes you look like a racist nutjob, nothing more :)

[startrash @1startrash4]

@Snaftastic1 @MurdochGlynn @davenewworld_2 No one fucking says that Christianity hates science, learn to read. MAGA is however extremely anti-science as you can see on a daily basis already based on things like denying climate change, beeing vaccine deniers, taking away reproductive right, etc.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@ZedongSecretary @subiesquad24 @jeffhawk30 It was "overturned" in Norways favor because it was clearly not a penalty. One right desicion does not somehow make a wrong one ok.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@SuperEagleDr @TypicallyJayden @TouchlineX It seems like you are missing a brain

[startrash @1startrash4]

@FabioYashin @SlavaMalamud Well according to your logic Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, the Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Turkey and countless more countries would also be "unofficially at war". You want to ban all of Europe? 🤣

[startrash @1startrash4]

@SlavaMalamud @ShyamS2023 Hard as it may be, these are sadly the well documented and objective facts.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@SlavaMalamud @ShyamS2023 I don't have a problem with a Jewish Nation existing and defending itself, but what Israel is doing is not just "defending itself". They are systematically committing genocide. Furthermore the amount of well documented war crimes is insane with nothing beeing done about it.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@Jayhayvzahlen @elhotzo Man kann doch potentielle EU Gesetze/Vorhaben kritisieren ohne gegen die EU zu sein? Ich bin großer Fan der EU und bin trotzdem strikt gegen die Vorhaben im Punkto Chatkontrolle. Inwiefern erzeugt das bitte einen Widerspruch?

[startrash @1startrash4]

@YOjawnZiLLA @RyoffRyon @TheInternetFish That comment alone says so much about you, and yet you will always stay too ignorant and stupid to reflect on that

[startrash @1startrash4]

@crpt0dgn @JohnHonesty__ True, could have been more strict is a huge understatement. The amount of things he missed means that he is either corrupt or completely incompetent and not fit to referee a single world cup match

[startrash @1startrash4]

@k_ioannou9 @JamesPearceLFC Yes. Why the fuck would you shake the hand of an opponent who played disgusting and unfair, constantly fouling, trying to injure players, trying to destroy the penalty point, kicking without the ball beeing involved and then even complaining? Completely understandable reaction.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@SaltySnickerUwU @kurtcobainyaoi @girl_lestat on trying to defend a definition that's completely wrong. If you'd actually like to learn something read this: https://t.co/527O7PIiNs Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) is literally listed at the very top as a prime example for a psychoactive drug.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@SaltySnickerUwU @kurtcobainyaoi @girl_lestat By definition deliriants are psychoactive drugs, with deliriants beeing part of the class of Hallucionogens which is one of the three mainly accepted classic of drugs next to depressents and stimulants. It's all semantics of course, so It's quite strange why you are so hellbent

[startrash @1startrash4]

@souInibbIer @pinkcellgirl So no you did not do that right and don't even seem to understand basic logic and reasoning

[startrash @1startrash4]

@souInibbIer @pinkcellgirl Your attempt at an equivalence here fails completely. An equivalent statement would be: If smoking caused lung cancer then people who smoke would be more likely to get lung cancer - which they are by far. Your comment has - from a logic point of view - nothing to do with the post

[startrash @1startrash4]

@Cocamani1 @JoelTheDane Of course it does. It means that Greenland and the Faroe Islands are both de facto and de jure Part of the Kingdom of Denmark. These two factors are literally as factual as it gets.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@WallaceVon1 @JustinBerkobien @rickwallis1957 You don't get to detirmine that a court does. And a court did so :)

[startrash @1startrash4]

@DawnsMission @Gypsy_4_ @NowPammsy Holy shit you have a serious problem. How can you be so obsessed with someone because they wear a mask? You need to get serious help.

[startrash @1startrash4]

@brentdelfscomc1 @Les61410Les @covie_93 So you are saying people that are illegaly in the country don't have to follow the law since they are not subject to the jurisdiction? Your argument makes zero sense, the 14th amendment is as clear as it gets and people like you are still too stupid to understand it