1stdivison

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@stevesnewday how does that make it evil? the Quran talks about financial rights which would be handled by primarily men in its ideal society so obviously it would be instructing men on how to treat women

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@sappholives83 for the sake of God jus stop speaking on shi u don’t know about, you could’ve just commented on the Bible without lying on islam blatantly😭

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@HarounKanj I mean it’s a good argument if you think fitrah means literally every single natural feeling possible

[زاكي @zakimze]

Blessing ya all ears😊.

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@baigBH5 @safaviyya79 read tafsir as well as the Qur’an otherwise you’ll end up with jahil interpretations that lead to contradictions, how do you reconcile this with 25:68-70, 39:53-54? The simple understanding is that this is about murderers (which the sahaba weren’t) who don’t repent.

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@ItsMrsRabbitToU I don’t believe you 💯

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 I reject the false dichotomy you posed which entails that a moral person after having done an unjust act is necessarily immoral

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@baigBH5 @safaviyya79 who told you if you kill a guy you’re necessarily going to hell, why are you strawmanning a theology to show an absurdity in it

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 Person X and Person Y are both moral, for C reason they are in a conflict where they believe the other is incorrect and they fight. What’s the impossibility here and where do one or both of them become immoral

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 no it doesn’t, you again assumed your conclusion I’m asking for why us assuming said principle when it comes to their lapses makes them infallible, no doubt we can say they made (outside of aqidah) mistakes and sinned whilst also saying they were of high moral character.

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@youarethekibo what’s the goal here tho are you saying bodies should not be sexualized cus that’s impossible like titties and dick will always be sexual

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 Okay atleast we’re getting somewhere, since you aren’t giving me answers bursting with substance I’ll assume the impossibility is them fighting people who they believe are moral, but even there I don’t see the impossibility which again you have to establish.

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@radfemsiren “Arab men”

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 none of what I said is based on it being a minor disagreement nor does the scale of any conflict actually affect my question which you didn’t answer

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 Your question implies some impossibility in this group of people whom we believe to be of integrity and moral character to not conflict in any case, and then you somehow place the burden on me to prove the possibility of this yet I’m not inclined to believe you in the first place

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@ZayDash_ @SimplyTroy2 @ennvyc the kids be coming to u and u literally just said nuh uh nigga shut up u are stupid

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@lunamaxxxing @Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 how does this show infallibility? obviously the sahaba would be considered the highest in authenticity when it comes to ahadith?

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@Adam80494145 @safaviyya79 lmao wallahi this is twitter is just retarded nigga ratioed me because he brought up adala sahaba to show that they’re somehow infallible when in reality it’s just a principle that of the Muslims, the sahaba who met the prophet with faith are of the best integrity and character

[1stdivison @1stdivison27640]

@FurqanHaqq definitely haram to due being impure, probably falls under harm to oneself which would also make it haram and even then it doesn’t fall under the category of things made to be ingestible so would still be haram