Colin Wood

Humanist, WOKE, 🇪🇺, dog lover, 3.5%, 💙,#FBPE, 🌻, 🇺🇦

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@ABC Kennedy is a in Knut

[Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE @nickreeves9876]

Please repost if you want Andy Burnham to work to restore our EU Freedom of Movement as soon as possible. It was robbed from us by the worst abuses of democracy in modern British history.

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@Suzierizzo1 A diaper

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@RonFilipkowski Spot on Ron

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@crsanchezx What's a PIR in this instance please

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@KayBurley Does she realise that her heritage is most likely Norman, Pochin 🇫🇷

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@dave43law All three and more, total dotard

[Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE @nickreeves9876]

The X algorithm is suppressing this post about Farage - only 410 views in over to hours.

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@RobertJenrick Jenrick, you're a Knut!

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@Jennyfurfuls Habitual liar

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@KayBurley Send the Cretanous Jenrick a map and ask him to identify Ceuta and a route to Calais

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@DonnaLouise1212 Get up to date you dingbat, they've all gone back

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@YourAnonCentral Absolutely spot on

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@nowthisimpact Gas hits the equivalent of $7.87 USD/US Gallon in the UK today!

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@coldwarsteve @Nigel_Farage RINSO might have been more fitting

[Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE @nickreeves9876]

This post on Farage, Cottrell and Nathan Gill us being suppressed by the X algorithm. It's popular, with 335 views, but it has only been allowed 3.5k views. That's strange given that social media algorithms are supposed to favour posts that get high engagement rates.

[Occupy Democrats @OccupyDemocrats]

BREAKING: Trump's $10 billion BBC lawsuit is BACKFIRING BIGLY and may force Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's January 6 evidence back into the courtroom

After making $16 million from Paramount/CBS to settle one of his frivolous lawsuits, Donald Trump figured he could keep suing media companies and rake in the dough from corporate CEOs who would rather give in than face a protracted and expensive legal fight.

But Trump got greedy and wanted a $10 billion payday from his next target, Britain’s venerable public broadcaster, the BBC.

What he's getting instead is a legal nightmare of his own making.

Trump sued the BBC last December, claiming a documentary on their news program Panorama, "put words in his mouth" by editing together portions of his January 6th speech delivered nearly 50 minutes apart.

He even bizarrely claimed the network used AI to fabricate his words — it didn't. The BBC did splice the footage, which sparked an internal investigation, the firing of some senior officials at the broadcaster, and the issuing of a written apology.

An apology simply wasn't enough for Trump, however. He still wanted that $10 billion.

Now his lawsuit against the British broadcaster is unraveling spectacularly.

A federal judge ruled this week that Trump must hand over detailed financial records from more than 400 companies tied to his family trust — because HIS OWN lawsuit claims the BBC's editing damaged his businesses.

You can't claim massive financial injury and then refuse to show your books. Judge Enjoliqué Lett wasn't buying the attempted dodge: "All of President Trump's brand, properties and businesses are impugned... Reputational, economic damages, all of that is now at issue in this case."

It gets worse. The same judge greenlit subpoenas targeting Trump's inner circle — Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, and Stephen Miller — to determine what Trump actually intended on January 6th.

And now, in a third gut-punch within 24 hours, the BBC is demanding records showing exactly how Trump LOST his executive privilege claims during Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's January 6th investigation.

Smith's team had already gathered evidence establishing that the Capitol violence was "foreseeable" to Trump, that he "caused it," and that he made "a conscious choice not to stop it" once it began. If the BBC gets that evidence, Trump's entire defamation case collapses.

Trump built a career suing media outlets into silence. This time, he sued an organization willing to actually fight — and in doing so, handed prosecutors a roadmap straight into his finances, his inner circle, and his own conduct on January 6th.

Plus, the public may get another chance to review the evidence that Jack Smith amassed against Trump, evidence that judges appointed by the litigious president have made sure that he’ll never be held accountable for.

Sometimes a lawsuit is simply a trap you built for yourself.

Please like and share to spread the news!

[Susan Powell @susanpow]

@Telegraph I presume the Telegraph is also pushing for all those Tories, some of whom were in office for only a day or so, to return the payments they received when they were appointed by Johnson and then resigned in order to get him out of office?

[Colin Wood @1woodcol]

@coldwarsteve Got most of the bastards Steve