@thenewarea51@analoguepilot You did peak my interest in the V
I would say the menus are better but not great
Body layout is better and not as good
Joystick is a big plus
I still like my IV (8yrs old) but the V looks like an overall product improvement
Price/value to competitors is beyond my paygrade
@thenewarea51@analoguepilot Based on reviews of the V
The V looks like an improvement using a better processing engine with the same great lens and sensor
Better:
AF
Stabilization
Dynamic range
Low light
4K Video
Battery
Menus still suck
Loss of the HF is niche that I only use tuning AR buffers/feeding
@analoguepilot@thenewarea51 I won't be upgrading but do like some of the V's improvements.
The menu system looks similar which is disappointing in today's world.
I actually use the high frame rate feature on the IV and that's been dropped.
@NafYochanan@camhigby The basic principle of our Justice system is that the State convicting an innocent person is a much greater evil than letting a guilty person free.
This is codified in the Bill of Rights.
@camhigby Your point is taken.
Using a platform to taint a jury pool might just affect the coming appeal, after the trial.
Our Constitution is not perfect and Justice takes time, but it's the best thing going.
@TheIntelFrog Drone attacks are a contingency that demands good countermeasures.
Serious progress on DEWs is happening.
That said, I doubt China will pre-emptively attack the USA.
The USA public would most likely not support defending Taiwan unless ChiComs struck the USA.
@Fenrir_Is_Here@DataRepublican Judge sanctioned the Prosecution for showing the picture.
The burned piece of paper was allowed in as evidence.
A picture of a picture on a cell phone is hearsay.
No matter ones opinion on this case this is the kind of thing that can get a case overturned on appeal.
@DataRepublican The Judge sanctioned the State for showing that photo because it's not corroborated.
I enjoy your posts but posting a photo the Judge has sanctioned the Prosecution for showing just taints the Jury pool even further.
@TRHLofficial I watch the full video.
You seem to be asking the right questions but your guest is out over his skies on the terminal ballistics issues and the actual raw unenhanced video.
So many questions and so few real answers.
@BSfarm__@ImBreckWorsham You're welcome to your opinion but the FBI does use ballistic gel for all testing of the duty ammo that they carry.
That's simply the factual truth.
I don't care what ammo was used in the provided videos.
I do have over 3 decades of experience in the firearms industry.
@BSfarm__@ImBreckWorsham Well the FBI uses ballistic gel as an analog for it's testing of duty rounds carried by agents.
The shot on video does go through the spine but you're correct that it also goes through the trunk and sternum.
Which is much thicker than the neck.
@remixedbrocc@hotchk1ss@it_a_me_knowlzy The ammo presented in court is Remington CorLokt.
Specifically says on the box and in all ad copy the bullet is designed to not "fragment".
@Columbianeedsme@hotchk1ss@it_a_me_knowlzy Rem CorLoct are not bonded but use a physical indentation in the jacket to keep the lead core and jacket together.
Distinction with a slight difference.
Remington does produce a true "bonded" version but it's labeled such on the box/cost more.
Your other points are spot on.