HL

In Australia

[HL @2025_HL]

@DataRepublican @RealCandaceO @AndrewKolvet Thank you for this....

[HL @2025_HL]

@megynkelly @megynkelly @MegynKellyShow

[HL @2025_HL]

@_Firelight @MegynKellyShow @megynkelly Well said...

[HL @2025_HL]

@Fair_and_Biased @realsashastone Totally agree...

[HL @2025_HL]

I think the reason it feels so fuzzy is that she’s operating in the space between an explicit claim and “just asking questions.”
It’s framed as:
• “I don’t know-know, but…”
• “This is just my opinion…”
• Dreams, symbolism, hypotheticals
• Long chains of rhetorical questions
That creates plausible deniability for one audience, while another audience clearly hears a conclusion.
If you strip away the caveats, the through-line many listeners are taking is:
That Erika and/or people at TPUSA were complicit in Charlie’s assassination, helped cover it up, and benefited from it ... possibly involving foreign actors or elements of US institutions.
The recurring “evidence” cited tends to be:
• Alleged aircraft tracking
• Travel irregularities
• Shadowy meetings
• Drone/security inconsistencies
• Timeline gaps
So when you ask “what’s the actual accusation?” — that’s the accusation people are hearing. It’s just constructed so it can always retreat to “I never said that, I was only asking questions.”

[HL @2025_HL]

@bren45000 Couldnt have said it better!!

[HL @2025_HL]

@BonkDaCarnivore Lol trump caved because the pension fund sold $100m in treasuries? Hahaa

[HL @2025_HL]

@ShannonMFHill Haha

[HL @2025_HL]

The size of the penalty is irrelevant. Saying “it’s only a ticket and a fine” misses the point. It’s like saying someone was only 5 km/h over the speed limit (a ticket and a fine) when they hit a pedestrian. The offence may be minor in isolation, but it still establishes unlawful conduct at the moment harm occurred, and that context matters.

[HL @2025_HL]

No .. nothing justifies the shooting in this case. However, my comment was in response to ' he can have a loaded gun and 100 magazines, none of that is illegal' ... there would be an argument that if wasnt carrying his permit + ID ...he was not lawfully carrying his weapon at that moment.

[HL @2025_HL]

The evidence contradicts your claim: Text messages confirm Pretti was in anti-ICE groups that explicitly coordinate disruption tactics against federal agents. Documented altercation with ICE occurred one week prior to the shooting. He carried a concealed firearm with two magazines - preparation inconsistent with 'passive observation'
When someone with a documented history of ICE confrontation, membership in groups teaching impediment tactics, and carrying concealed weapons shows up at an ICE operation - that's not 'humanity in action.' That's premeditated interference with law enforcement.
The physical evidence and communication records establish intent, not coincidence.

[HL @2025_HL]

@wjsteele @RealMissAI @eevblog And actively impeding the work of ICE/BP

[HL @2025_HL]

This Tucker Carlson interview was a real eye-opener. Megyn is clearly pivoting hard and doubling down. She is framing this whole CO situation as refusing to be "bullied" (often implying by Jewish critics or "the Jews"), while completely ignoring what Ben Shapiro actually asked: defend Erika Kirk and Charlie's legacy against baseless implications of complicity.
Though I don't think Megyn is antisemitic, she's dangerously crossing the line by blaming "the Jews" for pressure that never actually happened in that form.
I don't know how her ratings/viewership are trending overall, but she's certainly lost me ... an ardent supporter for good.

[Masih Alinejad @AlinejadMasih]

How dare you?
Millions of us Iranians are in total darkness.
The internet is shut down.
People being killed and from the safety of the free world, you go on international media to repeat accusations the regime uses to kill them.
That’s not analysis.
That’s fuel.
@piersmorgan

[HL @2025_HL]

@dsonoiki Surely he is joking!? 😄

[HL @2025_HL]

Your post is very selective, focusing on gun violence when guns are largely banned here. But guns are just a symptom. Root causes everywhere: mental health crises, extremist ideologies, enforcement gaps. Truth is, we have deeply unsettling violence too:

1. Bondi Junction: 6 stabbed to death (Apr 2024)
2. Bondi Beach: 12 killed in antisemitic terror attack
3. Jewish schools now require armed guards due to rising attacks
4. Synagogues firebombed during prayers, bishop stabbed at pulpit during service
5. Melbourne machete attacks (2025)
6. Porepunkah: 2 police killed, massive manhunt ongoing, largest in our history

ICE situations stem from 14M+ illegal immigrants. Scale drives enforcement violence. We need similar tough enforcement here, but activists block it crying "racism."

Healthcare: Yes, we have universal coverage, but we're taxed heavily for it (income tax, GST, payroll taxes, etc.). Nothing's free.

PM: I'd rather have a president convicted of minor bookkeeping charges than Albanese, who's backed Hamas, mishandled Parliament rape allegations, kept ISIS bride repatriations secret, slow-walked counter-terrorism measures despite rising threats, failed to act on campus antisemitism after Oct 7, and stands idle while synagogues burn and police get killed.

Australia has perks, but pretending we're immune to violence, hate crimes, or poor leadership ignores reality...

[HL @2025_HL]

I think you are spot on ... important to note that actual contact is not the legal threshold in use of force analysis ... it is whether a 'reasonable'officer would perceive an immidnet threat of serious or death at that moment. Courts have routinely treated a vehicle as a potential deadly weapon.

[HL @2025_HL]

It actually speaks well of your ability to think critically that you were able to step back from it. And to be fair, it’s not because people are stupid...it’s because the manipulation is clever.

She’ll provide solid receipts for one uncontested fact, then quietly leap from that fact to a far more serious conclusion.

Yes, Mitch was at Fort Huachuca. That may be true.
But a verified data point is not evidence of a secret meeting, let alone an assassination plot. Conflating the two is the trick.

[HL @2025_HL]

I agree with you ... what concerns me (most) is that her audience can’t see through it. I’m actually less concerned about 'Griftance'... they’ve always existed and always will.

When a narrative is structured so that every outcome confirms the same conclusion, that isn’t investigation, it’s indoctrination.

And when that is pointed out clearly, repeatedly, and people still refuse to engage critically, that responsibility no longer sits with the person selling the story. It sits with the people choosing to believe it.