@mixedbyshay@kammyxkammy@Tae_gusto@realdripking_zw Lol I only did that to show you what you sound like. Nigga why are you so salty this is not that serious.
Let’s see if you get a number 1 since it’s so easy
@mixedbyshay@kammyxkammy@Tae_gusto@realdripking_zw I feel your question is invalid because there’s individuals who never go a solo number 1 despite belonging to both eras.
To just say streaming I. The sole reason Drake got his first number one is simply an oversimplification.
@mixedbyshay@kammyxkammy@Tae_gusto@realdripking_zw Another strawman argument. I never said that.
The quality of a number one song has been variable throughout our recent history was my point in bringing up vanilla ice.
@mixedbyshay@kammyxkammy@Tae_gusto@realdripking_zw Has Jay z had a solo number one in the streaming era?
I never said it was easier. I think it’s the same if not slightly harder to get a number one in this era. These way more artists making music than today. Statistically alone that makes it harder
@242_bas@ThourghtF@carterwill815@TheRocSupremacy@Brandilism Distribution does not require being legally binded to share your splits with a label so you wouldn’t need being freed from them, and they wouldn’t even be able to devalue your music lol
@mixedbyshay@kammyxkammy@Tae_gusto@realdripking_zw Not sure why you’d think I’d be upset 😭
Streaming services needed Drake more than he needed them back in the day. Hence why apple they paid him so much money.
I’m just saying if it’s easier to get a number one now, why doesn’t most have at least one?
@Yann_thought Now add in the 400 million upfront. Of course it’s a revenue sharing agreement. The fact that you believe it can’t be legally binding is wild