The Sabarimala review case is about more than a temple. It is about how India interprets faith, dignity, and constitutional freedoms.
The open letter by Spiritual Sovereign Jainacharya Yugbhushansuri, argues that Articles 25 & 26 must be understood through Bharat's civilizational framework, not borrowed lenses.
Read full letter here:
https://t.co/MHzFHlfOEX
#SaveReligion #Sabarimala #JainacharyaOnSabarimala #RuleOfJustice #SaveShikharji
10/10. So we must see the danger plainly and with compassion for those who do not.
Our judges seek to do good. But 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗮 𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀, 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗴𝗲. Through that lens, even kindness sows the seed of discord and the family - the foundation of our civilisation, begins quietly to come apart.
𝗛𝗼𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗵𝗲𝗿, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻, 𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝘀, साम्राज्ञी - 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲, 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗸ā𝗿𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗻𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
9/10. That single change is the wound.
𝗗𝘂𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗱. The wife's tending is set against the husband's earnings. The years a child gave to an aging parent becomes a figure in a quarrel over inheritance.
A family that once gave without counting now begins to keep accounts.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
8/10. For, once the logic of price enters the home, it does not stay where it was placed.
A home is held together not by payment, but by 𝗺𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, what each owes the others, discharged across a lifetime.
𝗙𝗶𝘅 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 "𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗼𝘄𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿" to "𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗱?"
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
7/10. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴.
When a homemaker is lost, her family must be supported, with dignity and in keeping up with the life she upheld. But let it be understood for what it is: 𝗮 𝘁𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲, 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 It honours what no figure can measure.
To confuse the token with her worth is the whole error.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
6/10. This reveals the root of the error.
The very idea of "𝘂𝗻𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸" within a family is a borrowed one, a 𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁, which assumes every act carries a market value and that any act not paid for is a debt left unsettled.
But the Bhāratīya home was never built on payment. It was 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗮𝗹𝗹.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
5/10. For in a family, nothing is charged, because 𝗱𝘂𝘁𝘆 itself is the return of what one has received.
The child receives from the elders and is bound in time to give to his own. What flows down one generation is repaid to the next. This is not unpaid labour. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝘂𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱, 𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗱, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
4/10. And our tradition knew her station.
Bhāratīya paramparā did not call the woman of the house a 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿. It honoured her as साम्राज्ञी (sāmrājñī) - the sovereign queen of the household, its centre and its keeper. One does not pay a sovereign wage. One honours her. And hence she was honoured with '𝘀𝘁𝗿ī-𝗱𝗵𝗮𝗻', given as a gift during marriage and every occasion of her life by society. It was never as wage.
Nor was the man a worker within it: what he earns belongs, by right, to the whole family. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘄𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀. 𝗜𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
3/10. 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀.
She does not merely tend to a child. She gives "𝘀𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗸ā𝗿𝗮", she shapes a human being, forms the character that will outlive her and builds the person from within. This is 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗱. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
What number shall be placed upon that? There is none.
To name a figure is already to have misunderstood.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
2/10. Lets begin where the error begins: with the word "𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸."
To call what a #mother does "work" and then to price it, is already to see her through a lens that is not ours. It is the lens of the market, where every act is labour and every labour has a wage.
Motherhood does not belong on that scale at all.
#Homemaker #IndianCivilisation #BharatiyaParampara #Family
1/10. The #SupremeCourt has put a price on a homemaker's work: ₹30,000 a month.
It was meant to honour her.
Yet it may quietly wound something far larger than one judgment, the idea of the family itself, as 𝗕𝗵ā𝗿𝗮𝘁ī𝘆𝗮 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗿ā has held it.
#Homemaker#Family #BharatiyaParampara #IndianCivilisation
9/9. Therefore the need of the hour is 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗰𝘆.
It is to ensure that 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱, that power, in this deciding domain, remains 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆-𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗱 while the world is what it is.
Yet many hands are not enough on their own.
𝗦𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀.
In this age, #𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
8/9. So consider the question that is not being asked.
It is not "𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘄𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀."
To ask only that is to accept the cage and to seek a finer corner of it, when 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿'𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹.
The deeper question is: 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁?
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
7/9. We have tasted such concentration before and we know its flavour.
We have lived through a #unipolar world. We have seen how responsible or how reckless the decisions of a single dominant hand can be and the whole world has borne the consequences.
Now imagine that concentration made total: 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲, a power that, commanding the domain which governs all domains, 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, with no second sphere left from which to reply.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
6/9. This is why access is cut now, at the threshold.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗱. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗱.
The withdrawal is no retreat from the market, 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 #𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
5/9. This is why the present race must be seen for what it is.
It is not a contest for a better product or a larger market.
𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗶𝘁, 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲.
For #AI is not a power within one sphere.
𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀: 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗻, 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵, 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝘄.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
4/9. So let us be honest about escape.
𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗯 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳.
So long as the wires of communication and the routes of transport bind the world, 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁.
New tools - artificial intelligence, the making of things by 3D fabrication, may one day allow it, but only for those who become dependent on their own local resources.
𝗨𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱𝘀.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
3/9. And because all is linked, 𝗮 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲.
The war in #Ukraine raised the price of fertiliser and harvests failed in nations far from the fighting.
The war upon #Irán raised the question of energy and inflation followed into homes that had no part in it.
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻'𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲: 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
𝗔 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗯 𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
2/9. See how far the binding has already gone.
Currency moves now through 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻, 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲'𝘀 𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀.
#Media and information flow through a 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘁.
Supply chains thread through every nation, 𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗽.
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻 "𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲" 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗼.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
1/9. It is being said that this ban marks the death of globalisation. The truth is the reverse and graver.
#𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝘆𝗶𝗻��. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲.
The real question is no longer whether the world is bound together, but 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲, 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder