Mar

[Mar @25mar20001]

@sdsiffghyhgu @Nour_lll @Mayblife At that point just break up, the minimum you should do in that situation is stay with her, if you don't then you don't care about the person you are supposedly with.

[Mar @25mar20001]

@ConsevativHero @spacarias @Matokin8 Muchos niños nacen, con 40 semanas, con condiciones que no son compatibles con la vida. Mueren a las pocas horas de nacer. Hay padres cuya forma de decir adiós y tener paz es dejar que nazca y padres que prefieren terminar el embarazo antes. Es monstruoso no dar esa opción.

[Mar @25mar20001]

@KevinMe49077436 @Mayblife And yet, if you have a cancer in your hand, or another illness, they will present that as an option. Why not do the same for the uterus. Also, people sign forms, they can't sue as long as the procedure goes as planned.

[Mar @25mar20001]

@RudysDruy @grok @itdobemikey @tranmautritam this doesn't mean that interactions can't train the model, but usually the training data goes through an ofline filtering process before training, which is extremely costly, and not immediate, like going from gpt4 to gpt5. Human interactions are used in validation pipelines.

[Mar @25mar20001]

@RudysDruy @grok @itdobemikey @tranmautritam I read the article, it said that the issue was with prompt injection and not training data. Some models allow continual training with user interactions, but this is not optimal since it can learn incorrect data (very common) which eventually might lead to model drift. However +

[Mar @25mar20001]

@RudysDruy @grok @itdobemikey @tranmautritam I doubt very VERY much that grok allows online/continual learning. So no that interaction did not train the model.

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @oooaoo_lost @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH women in grounds maintenance work (which is the closest thing I could find) at it seems to be much lower for women. https://t.co/ZV9j05nx9l

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @oooaoo_lost @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH And as for falling down a tree, women tend to weight less, so that might be an advantage. In any case, mortality rates back then where super high, they lived much riskier life's than we do nowadays, it's not really a fair comparison. Also, I looked the rate of death of men vs +

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @oooaoo_lost @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH You mean cutting down wood? Wouldn't that make me better at it?

[Mar @25mar20001]

@MimiSchmoo @9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @oooaoo_lost @MadelaineLucyH It's kind of baffling isnt it?

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @oooaoo_lost @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH Do now*

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @oooaoo_lost @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH women not being strong enough to break wood I think you underestimate how strong our ancestors were, studies from bones show that those remains have better bone density than we do know, and where most likely stronger than us. You also overestimate how strong you need to be +

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH Wow, ummm, yeah, great point, surely that works of every language in the world 🤭. Anyways, what I meant is that other method of rule endorsement, like gossip, public shamming, ostracism, etc, here is an interesting Reddit thread with sources: https://t.co/r3lwwCZyI5

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH Not sure why you say that, it seems to me that your argument is that the enforcement of rules can only be done through force, and only men can do it. Which is false. There are many ways to enforce rules in a community and there are rules that historically women have enforced more

[Mar @25mar20001]

@9LULf7IVIb57Y5Q @MimiSchmoo @MadelaineLucyH I don't agree on your original statement though, tribes can have rules and enforcement, they might not be written in paper but that doesn't mean that those rules don't exist. For example, in a much smaller scale, all households have rules.