Canadian newcomers have once again been caught illegally fishing in our rivers
-Fishing for spawning salmon is illegal
-Fishing with nets is illegal
This is how they thank us for giving them a new life. The country that gives them everything (literally)
@LoveMy7Wood That will never make it to the public's perception. However, that being said, the Dental program is stupid for the majority of people without insurance.
New study:
Cloud-induced solar radiation forcing, not CO2, explains 2000-2022 warming.
"Earth’s energy imbalance has doubled...to 1.0 ±0.2 W/m² during the past decade. The increase is the result of a 0.9 ±0.3 W/m² increase absorbed solar radiation (ASR)"
https://t.co/aWaF43snS6
The Canadian government is coming to terms with the knowledge that they are not as infallible as they believed in their ability to enact laws without accountability or, more importantly, without liability.
The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that they should be held to account when enacting unconstitutional laws that infringe upon our rights, specifically those which are "clearly wrong, in bad faith or an abuse of power."
The decision, described as intending to “strike a balance between the protection of constitutional rights and the need for effective government” states, "The government and its representatives are required to exercise their powers in good faith and to respect the 'established and indisputable' laws that define the constitutional rights of individuals.” When legislation is passed that is found to meet “the very high threshold of being clearly unconstitutional, passed in bad faith or that amounts to an abuse of power,” the state can be found liable and be forced to pay reparations.
As expected, the Trudeau government argued they have absolute immunity, based on parliamentary privilege and sovereignty, and the constitutional principles of the separation of powers. They expressed concerns that “damages for enactments of even clearly unconstitutional legislation would open the floodgates to claims and chill them from passing constitutional laws out of concern they would later be on the hook for payments.”
Chief Justice Wagner and Justice Karakatsanis clarify; “By shielding the government from liability in even the most egregious circumstances, absolute immunity would subvert the principles that demand government accountability”.
Section 24(1) of the Charter confirms that damages are available where “appropriate and just in the circumstances.”
Recent history has demonstrated our government’s willingness to trample the rights of Canadians without accountability; we need only look at the freezing of bank accounts as one obvious example.
We can only imagine how concerned they must be now that they know, without a doubt, that we have the ability to dissect all of their decisions with this same scrutiny.
To read the decision Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, click the link; https://t.co/O8c2YcOhPu
@floydmarinescu What do you mean 'not earned'??? If I have accumulated assets through my hard work is that not something I have EARNED? If I tend to my assets and make sure they retain value is that not something I have EARNED? What utter nonsense. This just seems like so much envy.
@Graff2023@floydmarinescu Gov't should not steal from its citizens to pay for a UBC. They grab enough from me in taxes. Never seem to be able to get ahead. The 1 dollar the I have EARNED is being taxed into oblivion.