Записки Геокешера

[Cred @CryptoCred]

How I feel showing up to trade commodities and monitor the situation because BTC is stuck chopping and alts are shit

[Blockonomi @blockonomi]

Bitcoin has had one of its worst weeks of the year.

▪ 16% weekly drop
▪ $15B in futures sells on Binance, in a single day
▪ $1.75B in spot ETF outflows

Derivatives now trade 10x spot volume. They're running the market now.

Is this capitulation or just the beginning?

#Bitcoin #BTC #BitcoinPrice #CryptoMarket #BTCAnalysis #Blockonomi

👉Full Story Below👇

https://t.co/wqYbDk18aV

[CoinDesk @CoinDesk]

TECH: @Tether is leading a Series C of up to $1.4B in humanoid robotics company NEURA Robotics, planning to embed crypto wallet functionality directly into its robotic systems.

[Cardano Community @Cardano]

Join us Wednesday June 10 2026 at 14:30 UTC for another Roundtable Talk:

Examining Cardano Critical Integrations V2

We’re bringing together members of the Pentad for a focused discussion around the proposal’s governance structure, oversight mechanisms, and operational framework🧵

[Yoroi @YoroiWallet]

Yoroi Wallet App is now @secondfiapp. 🟦
Here’s what it means for Yoroi users:

- Your Yoroi DRep delegation stays exactly as you set it. SecondFi inherits Cardano governance from Yoroi.
- Your stake pool stays exactly as you set it. Rewards continue to the same pool (no re-delegation needed).
- Your keys, recovery phrase, and custody stay yours.

Same DNA. More ways to own your money: https://t.co/0cwiCGmZkB

[ETHConf @ethconf]

Day 1 of ETHConf is live at the Javits Center.

Everything on the Main Stage, from protocol research to institutional adoption.

Here's what's on the schedule for today ↓

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

Looks like the options thing is happening already!

See also: various people thinking through and building different versions of the idea in the thread: https://t.co/gFNEvCbHct

Though I do strongly urge that if any of these get on mainnet quickly, we formally verify it first. I hope @vyperlang and/or https://t.co/OMFlWRqJda folks ( @Fricoben) can help!

(Also, now is a good time to be thinking about robustness-optimized oracles)
https://t.co/j1dxLV4Pn4

[Cointelegraph @Cointelegraph]

🚨 WATCH: “Solana is one of the most explosive places to build on right now,” says Solstice CEO, Ben Nadareski.

Check out the full interview:

https://t.co/iYunXqtjRf

[Andreas (aantonop Team) @aantonop]

FREE class - Introduction to Digital Currencies - is starting on Feb 5th. Enroll now / learn more:
https://t.co/r7436WUOBz

[Mullvad.net @mullvadnet]

This is what the UK spyware proposal means.

There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.

When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).

The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.

Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.

Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.

The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.

The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.

@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
https://t.co/rbRmcUDTRu

Statement from @signalapp
https://t.co/vJILcSrs4s

@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
https://t.co/3FCi06bP77

The government announcement:
https://t.co/ynYjR3DIRo

[Brian Armstrong @brianarmstrong]

My number 1 piece of advice for engineers is: review your own PRs before anyone else does.

Getting out of the editor and reviewing in a pull request puts you into a different mindset.

[Andreas (aantonop Team) @aantonop]

ICYMI https://t.co/cB5i0ozYqC
#BitcoinHalving2024 #Bitcoin #HalvingBitcoin
(yes, our team made the audio a bit too fast, but hey, maybe you'll learn how to reduce playback speed on youtube, if you've never done that before 😉)

[Binance @binance]

You could be eligible for a share of up to 10M USDC in rewards.

Last call to get started. ⏳

[Andreas (aantonop Team) @aantonop]

Learn more about the Path to Self Custody Workshop Sale in this short video (and get the discount code too).

https://t.co/Ee0XyecAgN

[BitMart @BitMartExchange]

⏳ SpaceX – Last Chance to Enter. The Window Is Closing.

🌕 The final opportunity to secure shares in the world's leading aerospace unicorn ends today at 10:00 UTC. Miss this, and you may miss out on this interstellar journey forever.

🚀 Opportunity favors the swift. The last seat is reserved for those who act now.

🔗 Lock in your exclusive allocation today 👇
https://t.co/bKRwH2Bivi

#SpaceX

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

More people should know about the Interfold.

It's basically what I've been yelling at people to build with the MACI ideas ( https://t.co/mlDy84zXQo ) for almost a decade, and now it exists, in a generalized form.

The idea is: a privacy protocol optimized for things like voting (and other use cases eg. secret-ballot auctions). The mechanism generates a threshold encryption key, and people send in their votes onchain, using a ZKP to prove eligibility. An arbitrary computation on the votes gets run inside FHE, and then threshold-decrypted.

From what I can tell (the docs are good https://t.co/adzwK6ezMN ), it gets pretty optimal security guarantees:

* Voter anonymity can be made unconditional if eligibility is proven with ZK-SNARKs
* Censorship resistance is guaranteed by ethereum (votes can be posted directly onchain, and there's a proof that all posted votes are taking into account)
* The correctness of the outputted result can be ensured via ZK over FHE
* Liveness and coercion resistance depend on M-of-N honesty; unavoidable given present-day technology

The main limitation is that today "ZK over FHE" is only properly available for additive vote tallying, as it's too expensive for computations that involve multiplication or other more complicated manipulation at the moment. There's work in progress on slashing-based / optimistic computation for such situations.

(And of course ideally in the long term we'd figure out obfuscation so you can get rid of the M-of-N committees😃)

[Cointelegraph @Cointelegraph]

⚡️ INSIGHT: Blackrock has filed its latest amendment for a $BTC covered call ETF $BITA, targeting a 0.65% fee.

[Binance @binance]

Matchdays move differently with Binance. 🟡⚫

From crypto to kick-off, built for every play.

Score With Binance. ⚽

[Aya Miyaguchi @AyaMiyagotchi]

Vitalik shared his perspective on where @ethereumfndn is heading. Here is mine, another part of the same story.

The EF Mandate from the board was something I proposed late last year. Two main things prompted me. First, debates that were meant to be technical had started to become political and personal, and at times shaped by quieter incentives. Second, as EF grew, more and more versions of "what EF should be" began pulling at the core of the organization from every direction at once. I became convinced that trying to satisfy all of them would leave us achieving nothing at all. It was time for us to restate our role and underlying principles clearly, both the parts that have been clear from the start and those that have been informed by over a decade of experience.

We have said it many times: EF is one of many nodes in Ethereum. I know that is hard to hear for some, because EF was the first group, and in the early years it was essential for making things happen. But it was never meant to stay that way.

I have been in crypto since 2012, before it became an "industry." I joined Kraken in 2013, shortly before the implosion of Mt. Gox, which I helped to clean up. I am very aware of how real growth works, and also aware of the real risks of centralization. So when I became ED in 2018, I understood that Ethereum growing beyond EF would be essential to fulfill its real promise as a public blockchain. The goal I set for myself was to ensure that this happens.

The opposite path has always been untenable: Ethereum's future is too big for any single organization to bring about. So EF made deliberate choices to distribute power. We did incubate and release, like Uniswap and ENS. Support to seed a new norm, like ETHGlobal and the hackathons that are now everywhere. Funding the funders, like Gitcoin and Moloch. We always asked the same question: how does this stand on its own, without us?

Those experiments, alongside the work of countless others, contributed to where we are today. Ethereum is now far bigger than anything EF could coordinate alone. EF now holds less than 0.2% of all ETH, and the return on all of that shared work, together with extraordinary people across the ecosystem, has been beyond anything we could have built by ourselves.

That is exactly why a focused EF is possible now. The Mandate states simply the one thing EF must keep carrying: preserving and accelerating the properties and goals that keep Ethereum uniquely valuable, competitive, and worth building on. That is: CROPS - for the sake of inalienable user self-sovereignty and self-sovereign coordination. We cannot do it alone, and we do not intend to. But defining this as the north star for the mission, and coordinating with the allies who share it, is the responsibility we are keeping.

None of this means EF stops caring about adoption, for everyday users or for institutions. The opposite is true: everything we do is ultimately for the people who use Ethereum. Supporting adoption, including institutional adoption, remains part of our work, pursued in the ways that fit our mission. The value proposition of Ethereum for both everyday users and institutions rests heavily on this.

As EF becomes more focused and more opinionated, the team naturally becomes smaller and more concentrated. That is part of the choice. New leaders are already stepping into this mission and growing within it, and you will hear more from our management in the coming weeks, about what they are doing, and about the new structure and strategy taking shape.

The mission we carry is not a smaller one, but a clearer one. Special thanks to those who have stepped in to support, defend and advance it.

[Chainlink @chainlink]

JUST IN: Kalshi launches new LINK perps in an industry first for a U.S. company regulated by the CFTC